General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution

This is the place to comment on moderation procedures.Added by edit by Adminnemooseus - The following are the previous "General discussion of moderation procedures" topics, in order or origin: Change in Moderation?
General discussion of moderation procedures
General discussion of moderation procedures: The Sequel
General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consecution

Next thread in this series - The Consequtive Consecution Sequel

This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 12-12-2005 06:34 PMThis message has been edited by AdminNWR, 02-18-2006 08:43 PM

IMHO the best procedure in this case, as valuable as the content of the messages might be (and I think both messages were very good, very important, is to remove that content.The nature of a Great Debate is meant to be a limited discussion betwen two individuals. Additional input, no matter how good, no matter how much it adds to the content, is not appropriate.However, in this case a moderator has already stepped in and made a decision and Mark24 has responded and said he would not post further. I would let this one stand as is.

This is not a debate thread. Do not respond to messages except to comment on moderation procedures.Thank you.

---

Once you demonstrate that you can follow guidelines and discuss issues, your permissions can be restored.We do not censor you for your beliefs, you are free to believe anything you want. Join in the great debate at this thread.

---

I think I pretty much covered the reasoning in the response when I closed the thread. If you want to keep links and content like that on your hard drive, fine. But the Coffee House is not a personal filing cabinet. I've read your responses here as well as reread the initial OP and still see no reason for it's existence or continuation.This message has been edited by AdminJar, 01-04-2006 07:52 PM

---

While we like to try to maintain standards here, we also understand that we are dealing with two entirely different methods of thinking and approaches to both evidence and interpersonal relationships. We know that Atheists and Agnostics as well as most Buddhists, Taoists, Wiccans, Satanists, Muslims, Jews, Druids, Hindus and Animists are capable of, and regularly behave in a Christ-like manner. For that reason, we may hold them to a higher standard.

---

Please prove me wrong. Try behaving.Actions speaak louder than words.If your behavior shows me wrong, all will see it and be amazed.

---

Ray I looked over your link and see no accusation of plagiarism.