bobbins writes:
the stats in the graphs, what are the criteria, what is the data collection method, who asked the questions, who answered them?
Then you said
I only ask because I would never, ever use a graph unless I had compiled the data myself, and my intention was never to call you a liar, a proponent of anything, other than random drive-by graphics.
Earlier, you said
I did not assume diddly squat
Which indicate to me that you didn't really read my posts. Take a deep breath and read them again.
Heck, a website was even provided on one of the graphs and you somehow missed it.
So far, I have provided probably the most reliable source online (government source!)
I have treated this conversation more seriously than you have. So far, you have only waved your hands at my posts and continued to acuse me of several things, including lying.
Are you going to start treating me seriously or not? Do you even know where I stand on the issue?
Before you answer, take a deep breath and say 10 prayers of hail mary. Then, pray to Pat Robertson, Jimmy Swaggart, and Jerry Falwell. Then, reply with a little more seriousness.