|
Author
|
Topic: Proposed New (Great Debate) Topics
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
Message 1 of 61 (270112)
12-16-2005 4:34 PM
|
|
|
Nuggin has just proposed (via a Proposed New Topic) the Nuggin V. Randman 2: They Might Be Giants. This seems to be targeted to become a "Great Debate" topic. The initial proposing of a "Great Debate" via the PNT forum is problematic, as only the PNT originator and admins can post there. I think what we need to do, is to set up the ground rules etc. in a non-PNT, before the PNT is actually proposed. For the above cited case, I here ask Randman if he is interested in doing this "Great Debate" with Nuggin? We can also try to use this same topic, to set up future "Great Debates". Adminnemooseus
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 4 by randman, posted 12-17-2005 1:56 AM | | Adminnemooseus has not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 2 of 61 (270115)
12-16-2005 4:40 PM
|
|
|
"Nuggin V. Randman 2: They Might Be Giants"...
is the current new possible "Great Debate" topic. I posted this message to get that title into a subtitle, to bring the situation to the attention of Randman. Adminnemooseus Edited the change the ID from the cute kitty to the pinhead. Also added new and improved "signature" links. This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 12-16-2005 04:50 PM
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 5 of 61 (270342)
12-17-2005 1:39 PM
|
|
|
Re: Great Debate: Yaro and Carico on the ToE - Attn. Carico
Yaro has proposed a "Great Debate" with Carico here. Yaro, in message 4 of the above cited:
quote:
I was hopping Carico would see this and accept. If there was a thread where we could issue challenges, so we could bump them to the top, that would be helpfull.
That was my intent for this topic. Carico can not respond at the above cited, because "Proposed New Topics" topics are messages by originator and admins only. Carico - Interested in doing this "Great Debate"? Adminnemooseus
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 20 of 61 (370797)
12-19-2006 12:39 AM
|
|
|
Attn. Brian - Scottness wants a "Great Debate" with you
See the It's not impossible... "Proposed New Topic". Preliminary discussion can happen in this topic. Brian and Scottness only, please. Adminnemooseus
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 35 of 61 (395770)
04-17-2007 8:31 PM
|
|
|
Neutralmind has proposed a "GD" vs. Crashfrog and Chiroptera
At the A personal morality" topic. Please discuss the matter in this topic and NOT at the above cited. Adminnemooseus
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
Re: Neutralmind has proposed a "GD" vs. Crashfrog and Chiroptera
We seem to have a go on it. Please do a message 1 via the Proposed New Topics forum. Adminnemooseus
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 39 by Neutralmind, posted 04-21-2007 5:15 PM | | Neutralmind has not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 47 of 61 (483110)
09-20-2008 1:54 AM
|
|
|
Anyone interested at doing a one-on-one with Dunsapy?
Dunsapy Theory, still a "Proposed New Topic". I don't see releasing this to the masses as being a good thing. Any nice evolution type person out there want to do a one-on-one "Great Debate" on this topic? Adminnemooseus
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 48 by Blue Jay, posted 09-20-2008 9:06 AM | | Adminnemooseus has not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 51 of 61 (483708)
09-23-2008 8:25 PM
|
|
|
Anyone interested in a "Great Debate" with AlphaOmegakid on "Is Nature God?" topic?
Is Nature God? PNT As is, the topic's message 1 is a terminal mess. As I see it, this topic's going either "rejected", "Free for All", or "Great Debate". As per the Adminnemooses position of "no go", "I don't care", or "it's some other individuals problem to deal with". Adminnemooseus
Admin writes: It really helps moderators figure out if a topic is disintegrating because of general misbehavior versus someone in particular if the originally non-misbehaving members kept it that way. When everyone is prickly and argumentative and off-topic and personal then it's just too difficult to tell. We have neither infinite time to untie the Gordian knot, nor the wisdom of Solomon. There used to be a comedian who presented his ideas for a better world, and one of them was to arm everyone on the highway with little rubber dart guns. Every time you see a driver doing something stupid, you fire a little dart at his car. When a state trooper sees someone driving down the highway with a bunch of darts all over his car he pulls him over for being an idiot. Please make it easy to tell you apart from the idiots. Source
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 52 of 61 (496390)
01-28-2009 12:47 AM
|
|
|
Any individual member wish to go at it with Homunculus?
He has the topic Time interpretation theory sitting in the PNT forum. As I see it, the only way it's going anywhere is as a one-on-one "Great Debate". This should NOT be a two way exchange of stupidity. If interested, reply to this message. If not interested, DON'T reply to this message. Adminnemooseus
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 53 by RAZD, posted 01-28-2009 7:48 AM | | Adminnemooseus has not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 56 of 61 (547534)
02-19-2010 10:26 PM
|
|
|
Anyone want to 1 on 1 with SocialEvolution at "The Mud Theory"?
The Mud Theory This would be a disaster area as an open to all topic. It would amount to an admin/SocialEvolution "Great Debate", to get the proposed topic into a better form (or something like that). Any member want to do a FRIENDLY* little chat with SocialEvolution? Adminnemooseus *not Dr. Adequate
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 57 by subbie, posted 02-19-2010 10:28 PM | | Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied | | | Message 58 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-19-2010 10:39 PM | | Adminnemooseus has seen this message but not replied | | | Message 59 by lyx2no, posted 02-19-2010 11:01 PM | | Adminnemooseus has replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 60 of 61 (547552)
02-19-2010 11:22 PM
|
Reply to: Message 59 by lyx2no
02-19-2010 11:01 PM
|
|
Re: Anyone want to 1 on 1 with SocialEvolution at "The Mud Theory"?
I'm going to plug lyx2no into this one. Please be kind and gentle. Maybe we can bring subbie in later (substitute off the bench?). My opinion - The peanut gallery later, maybe. Adminnemooseus
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 59 by lyx2no, posted 02-19-2010 11:01 PM | | lyx2no has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 61 by lyx2no, posted 02-20-2010 12:17 AM | | Adminnemooseus has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2