Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   George Bush protecting your civil liberties by breaking them
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4899 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 16 of 220 (270533)
12-18-2005 3:18 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Silent H
12-18-2005 5:20 AM


all communications are monitored
Holmes, every electronic communication is monitored, period, and run through computer analysis, and if warranted specific people's communications are monitored by more than computer analysis.
Don't fall for the smokescreen.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Silent H, posted 12-18-2005 5:20 AM Silent H has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by jar, posted 12-18-2005 3:32 PM randman has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 17 of 220 (270536)
12-18-2005 3:23 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Silent H
12-18-2005 5:07 AM


Re: time of war
I know we've had our disagreements over things in the past but this:
Our Presidents are not Gods nor Kings. They are Men, and it is OUR RIGHTS which stand above THEM. Otherwise it is just words on paper.
is beautiful.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Silent H, posted 12-18-2005 5:07 AM Silent H has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 18 of 220 (270539)
12-18-2005 3:32 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by randman
12-18-2005 3:18 PM


Re: all communications are monitored
Holmes, every electronic communication is monitored, period,
If that is true then it is a clear violation of the Constitution.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by randman, posted 12-18-2005 3:18 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by randman, posted 12-18-2005 3:38 PM jar has replied
 Message 28 by arachnophilia, posted 12-18-2005 9:19 PM jar has not replied
 Message 39 by clpMINI, posted 12-19-2005 12:40 PM jar has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4899 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 19 of 220 (270541)
12-18-2005 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by jar
12-18-2005 3:32 PM


Re: all communications are monitored
If that is true then it is a clear violation of the Constitution.
And....? You just realizing the government doesn't follow the Constitution in many areas? You think the Dept of Education is part of the federal charter in the Constitution? Gun laws?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by jar, posted 12-18-2005 3:32 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by jar, posted 12-18-2005 4:04 PM randman has replied
 Message 23 by crashfrog, posted 12-18-2005 4:09 PM randman has not replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2492 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 20 of 220 (270544)
12-18-2005 3:48 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by randman
12-18-2005 12:05 AM


War or No, Bush has too much power
Right or wrong, if we are considered in a time of war, and under threat, Bush's actions are entirely consistent with other president's in our nation's history.
Not true.
First of all, we aren't in a war. The Congress did not declare war. We have troops in Iraq, but the US Citizens that the Bush Admin was secretly and illegally monitoring were not involved with Iraq.
They refuse to release a list of who the 500+ people were. There is no oversight. It's possible (I would argue highly likely) that John Kerry was one of the people they spied on. After all, there's no one to stop them.
Additionally, under what other President has the executive branch had the ability to strip a US Citizen of not just their rights, but they citizenship? With the Patriot Act, not just Bush, but the Attorney General has the right to strip you, Randman, of your US citizenship - even though you are not a dual-citizen (I assume)
That's brand new power. And it's completely unchecked. Just like the imprisonments, the torture, the kidnapping of foreign citizens.
This whole "We are at war" because the President says we are at war is circular.
"I need more power because we are at war, so don't question my powers because we are at war. We are at war because I say we are at war. I have the power to say we are war because I gave myself the power because we are at war."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by randman, posted 12-18-2005 12:05 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by randman, posted 12-19-2005 12:41 PM Nuggin has replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2492 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 21 of 220 (270547)
12-18-2005 3:53 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by randman
12-18-2005 3:14 PM


Re: time of war
There is a distinct difference between the NSA doing it and the President signing an order saying that the NSA can do it.
Rape is illegal. Rape happens. But if the President signed a Presidential order saying Rape is okay, that's a problem.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by randman, posted 12-18-2005 3:14 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by randman, posted 12-19-2005 12:40 PM Nuggin has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 22 of 220 (270550)
12-18-2005 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by randman
12-18-2005 3:38 PM


randman again tries to change the subject
And....? You just realizing the government doesn't follow the Constitution in many areas?
If the President of the United States authorizes behavior in violation of his sworn oath to "uphold the Constitution" he should be impeached, tried, convicted and thrown out of office. Once that is done the next step would be to try him for criminal wrongdoing to see if he should also be sent to jail.
The rest of your post is your usual attempt to change the subject and so as usual, should simply be ignored.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by randman, posted 12-18-2005 3:38 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by randman, posted 12-19-2005 12:42 PM jar has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1467 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 23 of 220 (270554)
12-18-2005 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by randman
12-18-2005 3:38 PM


Re: all communications are monitored
You think the Dept of Education is part of the federal charter in the Constitution?
Why wouldn't it be? All the DE can do is offer conditions for funding. The states don't have to accept. I thought free markets, the freedom to spend as you see fit, were what you people were all about.
Gun laws?
The second amendment says "well-regulated militias." Not "anybody can have all the guns they like." Not only does the Constitution allow the Federal government to regulate an armed populace, it specifies that they must.
The Constitution is a neat document, Rand. Maybe you'd like to read it sometime?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by randman, posted 12-18-2005 3:38 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Adminnemooseus, posted 12-18-2005 4:17 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 24 of 220 (270555)
12-18-2005 4:17 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by crashfrog
12-18-2005 4:09 PM


Let's not divert this topic into gun law discussion (or other OT matters)
I'm pretty sure there's a relevant existing topic. Look for it.
Now that I have this message up, I'll go look for it also. Stand by for edit.
Adminnemooseus
Added by edit:
The 409 message A discussion of Gun Control for schrafinator, started by Jar, and now freshly closed by Adminnemooseus (300+ messages you know).
The earlier and still open gun control, started by Schrafinator.
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 12-18-2005 04:28 PM

New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC and Assistance w/ Forum Formatting

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by crashfrog, posted 12-18-2005 4:09 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5819 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 25 of 220 (270556)
12-18-2005 4:28 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by randman
12-18-2005 3:14 PM


Re: time of war
Bottom line is this is how the government operates, and has so since it's inception. Nothing new here.
Well that's pretty clearly not true. What's the first example you have from its inception?
But as I have already stated, that does not make a difference. The founding fathers did warn us such things eventually would be tried and that they should be fought.
So here it is, shall we fight it or let it happen?
I agree that Bush does not hold to truly strict constructionism.
Okay, so you are in agreement that he is not a strict constitutionalist and is hypocritical when claiming such things.
anyone that thinks this is the first time the CIA or NSA has secretly spied on Americans is very naive.
Its well known that they have. I'm not that naive. The point is that it gets stopped when it is found. Torture also gets used, should it not be stopped when found? Politicians have always attempted to get around the laws to defeat their opponents in some way. That should be stopped right?
We agreed that this kind of thing was wrong in the soviet union and Iraq, right? That it needed to be stopped?
and you guys jump on it like a hungry spot-tail bass on a free-lined live mullet.
Or like someone upset that a president would violate their powers.
They can easily do this legally via their partnerships with the Aussies and Brits who are technical partners in the Echelon spy system.
I realize the technical possibility is there. That it is going on is not necessarily proven. But if so, is this not something we should be concerned about and fighting?
So while you're fretting about the possible Constitutional infringement of a hundred or so wiretaps,
Where I currently live they have already given away their rights to law enforcement. There is absolutely no concept of freedom of communication here. I am fretting because it is not possible, I am fretting over unabashed abuse of power.
Where are your principles as a conservative? Govt out of people's lives? Where is your outrage?

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by randman, posted 12-18-2005 3:14 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by randman, posted 12-19-2005 12:48 PM Silent H has replied
 Message 45 by randman, posted 12-19-2005 12:50 PM Silent H has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6408
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 26 of 220 (270608)
12-18-2005 8:02 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Silent H
12-18-2005 2:38 PM


Isn't it clear? You obviously meant "doesn't" otherwise I wouldn't have replied as if you had. The fact that you wrote "does" only shows how devious you are!
Strange.
I took jar as meaning what he said (i.e. "does"). I'm wondering how you are reading "doesn't" into that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Silent H, posted 12-18-2005 2:38 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Silent H, posted 12-19-2005 4:15 AM nwr has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9076
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.7


Message 27 of 220 (270611)
12-18-2005 8:09 PM


If there is no law allowing it then it is illegal
Randman your views are evidently way different then the vast majority of people that have spoken on this subject so far. Members of Congress on both sides are demanding answers and what was the legal justification. Not just blogs, but newspaper editorials across the country are critical. I have linked to a number of them on my blog. Bruce's Ideas, Thoughts and Observations. Careful the liberal viewpoints may permanently scar the psyche of conservatives.
This president has decided that he is above the law. Do he and his handlers not understand that being president does not give one unlimited powers? Is there be a time and place where american citizens need to be surveilled? Sure there are. We have mechanisms for that. We have courts, we have search warrants and we have the police and the FBI. To have the NSA or CIA spying on US citizens in the US is wrong and illegal. He must be called to account. The administration needs to be shown that THEY are not above the law. It is not OK to break laws and and to deny civil liberties in the name of protecting America from terrorists. If we have our civil liberties destroyed and removed than those that want to destroy our way of life have won. President Bush has given the terrorists an overwhelming victory. He accuses his critics of waving a white flag and giving up. President Bush has become as effective as a fifth coulumn in the US. He has ineptly played into their hands and is actively helping to destroy the freedoms, liberties and way of life they so hate about the United States.

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by randman, posted 12-19-2005 12:54 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1343 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 28 of 220 (270633)
12-18-2005 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by jar
12-18-2005 3:32 PM


Re: all communications are monitored
If that is true then it is a clear violation of the Constitution.
quote:
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
there's a couple of stipulations here, regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy.
for instance, if you're broadcasting something over the radio, you have no reasonable expectation of privacy. it's going out over the air, and you know you're telling multiple people information. what people don't realize is that cell phones don't have a much higher expectation. it's still broadcasting, but people may not realize. "wire" taps on cellphones do not actually break the fourth amendment. and it's questionable (iirc not unconstitutional) to tap portable phones.
the standard is the same as doing something in your house with the blinds open. if a normal person walking down the street can accidentally happen upon it, then the police do not a need a warrant to "accidentally" happen upon it either. it's the plain-sight rule. so the kind of phone matters. taping coversations between landlines without a warrant is unconstitutional (unless one is a payphone).
also, email is NOT private for a very similar reason. open up an email and look at it's properties for a bit. how many servers did it go through? on any one of maybe a dozen computers informations could have leaked or been seen by an administrator or any number of other things.
now, don't get me wrong. i'm not defending bush here. this is just background info. i'm still not sure what part of the constitution gives him the right to commission this kind of thing. it's not a specific search, it's overbroad collection of data on the american people. the above are all in instances of reasonable suspicion or even probable cause -- not a quest to find people who are guilty without any foreknowledge. it compromises the privacy and security of the american people, and 99% of them are pretty much gauranteed to not be who the government is looking for.
[edit: jar gave me some links in chat that indicate the rulings over privacy on cellphones and cordless phones is currently under question]
This message has been edited by arachnophilia, 12-19-2005 01:33 AM

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by jar, posted 12-18-2005 3:32 PM jar has not replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 3993 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 29 of 220 (270663)
12-19-2005 12:09 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by randman
12-18-2005 3:14 PM


Re: time of war
The unstated message is that the NSA only spies on Americans in such extreme circumstances rather than the truth, which is they spy on virtually all electronic communications in the entire world via Echelon and Carnivore systems. They can easily do this legally via their partnerships with the Aussies and Brits who are technical partners in the Echelon spy system.
And what about the rumour of a trapdoor in Echelon that lets you spy on US. So far we have fought alongside the U.S. in two World Wars, Korea, Vietnam, Somalia, Afghanistan and now, Iraq.
Thanks to financial and documentary assistance, your CIA brought down one of our most popular governments, helped set up a merchant bank to wash dirty money and 'disappeared' one of the principals, an ex-CIA agent, when the bank collapsed, and jailed a communications specialist when he blew the whistle of the cutting of Australia out of the intelligence loop. Even your intel bases in Australia seem to be sparing with sharing their information. Still, we remain friends so I guess we must be a patient people.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by randman, posted 12-18-2005 3:14 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by jar, posted 12-19-2005 12:13 AM Nighttrain has not replied
 Message 47 by randman, posted 12-19-2005 12:55 PM Nighttrain has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 30 of 220 (270665)
12-19-2005 12:13 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by Nighttrain
12-19-2005 12:09 AM


Re: time of war
Well your Kiwi Cousins are concerned enough that some are calling for a suspension of the output from Waihopai.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Nighttrain, posted 12-19-2005 12:09 AM Nighttrain has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024