Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,865 Year: 4,122/9,624 Month: 993/974 Week: 320/286 Day: 41/40 Hour: 7/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Yec/Not Yec? - A "let's keep it short topic"
Percy
Member
Posts: 22502
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 13 of 40 (272190)
12-23-2005 5:35 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by randman
12-23-2005 5:27 PM


Re: yawn....what idiocy
I, for one, am completely flummoxed by your approach to discussion. Is there any way possible to have a civil and rational discussion with you? If so, please let us know.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by randman, posted 12-23-2005 5:27 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Percy, posted 12-23-2005 5:37 PM Percy has not replied
 Message 20 by randman, posted 12-23-2005 10:08 PM Percy has replied

Percy
Member
Posts: 22502
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 14 of 40 (272192)
12-23-2005 5:37 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Percy
12-23-2005 5:35 PM


Re: yawn....what idiocy
Perhaps we could make better progress in the chatroom. I'm going to hang out there for a bit. Anyone who joins, please give me a few minutes to notice...thanks!
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Percy, posted 12-23-2005 5:35 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Minnemooseus, posted 12-23-2005 5:42 PM Percy has not replied

Percy
Member
Posts: 22502
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 22 of 40 (272395)
12-24-2005 8:57 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by randman
12-23-2005 10:08 PM


Re: yawn....what idiocy
Hi Randman,
Before I address your post, let me ask again if you would be so kind as to give Carico a hand in the explaining common ancestry thread. This is from Message 113:
Carico writes:
And again, for the umpteenth time, since apes and humans cannot breed with each other, they are different species.
Though no one has done so, Carico seems to believe that it is being repeatedly claimed that apes and humans can breed with each other. Naturally this makes no sense, since apes are a superfamily, not a species, and humans (along with gorillas and chimpanzees) are a type of ape. It would be appreciated if a fellow creationist could help him out with understanding the biological classification system.
Now, responding to your post:
randman writes:
Percy, try looking at this from the other side for a bit. You guys misrepresent and say the most outlandish and childish things about your critics, and then if you barely begin to act decently and engage the discussion honestly, you expect to be rewarded as if you bend over backwards.
The nature of the debate is that both sides perceive the other as making misrepresentations, making outlandish claims and becoming personal. After years of observing creation/evolution discussions devolve into name calling and recriminations, I started EvC Forum with the goal of creating a moderated venue where personal animosities had to be set aside at risk of suspension. The Forum Guidelines here at EvC Forum, which I wrote, were specifically designed to make possible civil debate.
The other means by which I hoped to achieve this goal was the appointment of moderators from both sides of the debate. Recruiting creationist moderators has proved difficult, and finding ones who actually moderate instead of imitating wall flowers is even more difficult. It was hoped that you would bring the same energy and activism that you bring to discussion to your moderating.
What you have instead brought is a tepid level of moderating and a new high in the abuse of the Forum Guidelines. Look at the title of this message. Who placed "idiocy" in the title? Who placed "buffoon" in another message title? Who keeps calling people liars? You're even the reason that the word "liar" is now represented by asterisks, along with Haeckel. You can't seem to stop from calling people liars, and you can't seem to refrain from turning threads into discussions of Haeckel. You're a walking poster board for the stereotypical abusive bulletin board denizen.
EvC Forum is intended for civil discussion. Its goal is to bring light to the debate, not heat. Please do your part to make this possible. That means moderating threads so as to call attention to evolutionist misbehavior with regard to the Forum Guidelines. And it means setting a good example for others when engaged in discussion by following the Forum Guidelines instead of violating as many as you can.
Remember, you appear as bad to evolutionists as they do to you. The only way to have productive discussion is if everyone focuses on the topics of discussion and not on what they perceive as the foibles of their opponents. In particular, I'm asking you to follow rule 10 of the Forum Guidelines:
  1. Always treat other members with respect. Argue the position, not the person. Avoid abusive, harassing and invasive behavior. Avoid needling, hectoring and goading tactics.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by randman, posted 12-23-2005 10:08 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by randman, posted 12-24-2005 12:32 PM Percy has not replied

Percy
Member
Posts: 22502
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9


Message 33 of 40 (272774)
12-26-2005 4:25 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by randman
12-24-2005 5:50 PM


Re: The "anti-evo" Randman
Hi Randman,
I think Minnemooseus is, like the rest of us, having difficulty seeing the consistency or central theme within your perspective, so he asked for a clear statement of what you believed so that it could be referred to from time to time whenever we became confused about where you're coming from. You replied with a statement that barely qualifies as musings:
randman writes:
I think the scientific evidence does not support evolutionary models. So my best guess is ID. I think YECers do some interestign research, but I am not convinced that the earth is young. Of course, I am not convinced the age of the earth stays the same, nor that there is one static past. In fact, I strongly suspect this is not the case, and we need to view the universe as space-time which can lengthen and contract. I don't believe in only linear causation with respect to time, and think evolutionary models are outdated by modern physics.
My guess is that, surprised at the lack of specificity and any evidence-based foundation, he asked if this was really what you wanted for a position statement. If you think it sufficient, fine. Perhaps some will be interested in exploring this with you in an attempt to tie your musings in with real science.
But returning to the thread's topic, what YEC research are you thinking of that you described as "interesting." I think knowing this will give us a better idea of your position on YEC.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by randman, posted 12-24-2005 5:50 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by randman, posted 12-26-2005 2:21 PM Percy has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024