Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,488 Year: 3,745/9,624 Month: 616/974 Week: 229/276 Day: 5/64 Hour: 3/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Rant: stop misusing the word 'paradigm'!
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.4


Message 1 of 11 (269977)
12-16-2005 10:15 AM


BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Dino discovery 'overturns wisdom'
New discovery challenges existing ideas on dinosaur evolution, blah, blah, blah and then:
quote:
"We may see the beginning of a paradigm shift, a challenge to the idea that the oldest dinosaur was bi-pedal and warm-blooded," Dr Sander explained."
No, Dr Sander, that is not a paradigm shift! Under a paradigm shift, the newer concept doesn't make sense in the terms of the older concept that is simply not the case here or in any of the other cases I've seen people spout drivel like this. Kuhn's idea of paradigm shifts is dubious at best, but at least if you're going to invoke the idea do it bloody properly - Relativity might be a paradigm shift, Quantum theory might be a paradigm, Evolution could be a paradigm shift but changes in our ideas of how a specific group of animals about whom we have frickin' little actual evidence evolved is not a paradigm shift.
OK?
(Er, Misc topics I guess, or wherever, I don't really care - as I see it, it should be for the mods to decide where to put a topic, not the poster)

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Phat, posted 12-16-2005 10:26 AM Dr Jack has replied
 Message 4 by cavediver, posted 12-16-2005 10:28 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
AdminPhat
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 11 (269979)
12-16-2005 10:18 AM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18310
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 3 of 11 (269985)
12-16-2005 10:26 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Jack
12-16-2005 10:15 AM


Paradigm Definition
Hello, Mr. Jack---are you still writing comic books? Glad to hear from you! In regards to this topic, lets define paradigm:
Websters writes:
paradigm \par-e-dm, -dim\ n 1 : model, pattern 2 : a systematic inflection of a verb or noun showing a complete conjugation or declension paradigmatic \par-e-dig-ma-tik\ adj
So what is your working definition as to what constitutes a true pattern...model...or paradigm shift? And what makes one model valid and one model invalid?
What is the focus of this topic, anyway? I placed it in Miscellaneous Topics to cover the bases. Now it is your turn to show us the game.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Jack, posted 12-16-2005 10:15 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Dr Jack, posted 12-16-2005 10:57 AM Phat has replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3665 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 4 of 11 (269986)
12-16-2005 10:28 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Jack
12-16-2005 10:15 AM


Don't hold in the emotion
Come on Jack, don't hold back. Tell us how you really feel
Couldn't agree more though...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Jack, posted 12-16-2005 10:15 AM Dr Jack has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.4


Message 5 of 11 (269995)
12-16-2005 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Phat
12-16-2005 10:26 AM


Re: Paradigm Definition
Hello, Mr. Jack---are you still writing comic books?
Writing comic books? I think you have me confused.
So what is your working definition as to what constitutes a true pattern...model...or paradigm shift?
The terms come from Thomas Kuhn's philosophy (although Kuhn was arguably more of a historian than a philosopher). Kuhn argued that the history of science was marked by "Paradigm Shifts" in which the entire way of looking at things was changed in a way that meant the old ideas no longer made sense from the point of view of the new, and the new ideas made no sense from the point of view of the old. That, and the change in what was accepted in science was acheived not by the current crop of scientists being convinced to change their minds but by a their being replaced by a new generation who accepted the new ideas.
The classic example of this being Quantum Mechanics who's probabilistic and highly counter-intuitive results were widely resisted by classic physicists. Einstein's long standing resistance ("God does not play Dice") being a case in point.
Frankly, I think Kuhn wildly overstated his claims. But what is clear is that a change in the particulars of an evolutionary tree - any evolutionary tree - does not constitute a Paradigm Shift because the old and new ideas are still using the same structual model.
And what makes one model valid and one model invalid?
I don't see how that is relevant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Phat, posted 12-16-2005 10:26 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Phat, posted 12-16-2005 11:00 AM Dr Jack has replied
 Message 7 by jar, posted 12-16-2005 12:23 PM Dr Jack has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18310
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 6 of 11 (269996)
12-16-2005 11:00 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Dr Jack
12-16-2005 10:57 AM


Re: Paradigm Definition
Mr.Jack writes:
what is clear is that a change in the particulars of an evolutionary tree - any evolutionary tree - does not constitute a Paradigm Shift because the old and new ideas are still using the same structual model.
OK...gotcha
I mean't board games not comic books
This message has been edited by Phat, 12-16-2005 09:00 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Dr Jack, posted 12-16-2005 10:57 AM Dr Jack has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Dr Jack, posted 12-19-2005 4:40 AM Phat has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 7 of 11 (270022)
12-16-2005 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Dr Jack
12-16-2005 10:57 AM


Re: Paradigm Definition
The far greater paradigm shift is that you can no longer get a cup of coffee for a pair-o-dimes.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Dr Jack, posted 12-16-2005 10:57 AM Dr Jack has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by joshua221, posted 12-16-2005 3:07 PM jar has not replied

  
joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 11 (270081)
12-16-2005 3:07 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by jar
12-16-2005 12:23 PM


cafes are yuppie havens
yuppie

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by jar, posted 12-16-2005 12:23 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Omnivorous, posted 12-17-2005 5:55 PM joshua221 has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 9 of 11 (270379)
12-17-2005 5:55 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by joshua221
12-16-2005 3:07 PM


Re: cafes are yuppie havens
yuppie
young urban professional
Isn't that you will be in a handful of years? Watch the mirror closely...

Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by joshua221, posted 12-16-2005 3:07 PM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by joshua221, posted 12-23-2005 8:11 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Dr Jack
Member
Posts: 3514
From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch
Joined: 07-14-2003
Member Rating: 8.4


Message 10 of 11 (270680)
12-19-2005 4:40 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Phat
12-16-2005 11:00 AM


Re: Paradigm Definition
I mean't board games not comic books
Wrong again...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Phat, posted 12-16-2005 11:00 AM Phat has not replied

  
joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 11 (272238)
12-23-2005 8:11 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Omnivorous
12-17-2005 5:55 PM


Re: cafes are yuppie havens
hell no
i can't stand the thoughts and the lifestyles of these people. Nothing cool there, I want to be more like clint eastwood lol

Your body may be gone, I'm gonna carry you in.
In my head, in my heart, in my soul.
And maybe we'll get lucky and we'll both live again.
Well I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. Don't think so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Omnivorous, posted 12-17-2005 5:55 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024