|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 65/40 Hour: 1/5 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Does Darwinism Equal "No God"? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I think I saw those drawings in a high school text book some time ago.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Asgara Member (Idle past 2330 days) Posts: 1783 From: Wisconsin, USA Joined: |
Faith, what is it...in msg 245 you say:
but I certainly remember when the Biogenetic Law was gospel, and ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny was drummed into my generation in high school and now 41 posts later:
I think I saw those drawings in a high school text book some time ago Which is it...you think you saw the pictures or the concept was drummed into your generation? Asgara "I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now" Save lives! Click here!Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC! http://asgarasworld.bravepages.comhttp://perditionsgate.bravepages.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6382 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
Sorry, I phrased my request poorly so what you posted wasn't what I was after (entirely my fault - off to bed with no supper for me ).
As all this off topic and the thread is nearing the end I won't pursue it. I might start a new topic after Christmas if I can be arsed. I wish I didn't know now what I didn't know then
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
I tried to explain it to Randman, but of course he wouldn't listen. Yes, ******* substituted dog embryos for humans. But it really didn't matter. The principle was accurate. My author pointed out that the dog embryos and the human embryos were almost identical.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Oh brother. Well I don't want to get into this endless discussion about ********** But that wasn't the charge against ********* The charge is that the embryos were NOT accurate, do NOT represent what really occurs. Also, if ontogeny does not recapitulate phylogeny (or is it the other way around?), what is the point of there being similarity between embryos anyway? DESIGN ECONOMY REIGNS!!!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Oh brother I'm just telling you what my book says. Here's a quote: "Heackel had fraudulently substituted dog embryos for the human ones, but they were so similar to humans that these (if available) would have made the same point" (28). This message has been edited by robinrohan, 12-23-2005 09:24 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I hope you realize that that information is cause for starting an entire new thread on *******.
This message has been edited by Faith, 12-23-2005 10:25 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
I hope you realize that that information is cause for starting an entire new thread on *******. Please. The point is that the idea was correct, according to my author. My book was published in 2001.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Well, I've found Randman's points credible so I'm now in the position of doubting Mayr.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Well, I've found Randman's points credible so I'm now in the position of doubting Mayr. I don't think it matters, Faith, what authors I use. You'll doubt them all. It doesn't matter what evidence I present. You'll dismiss it with contempt. However, I will soldier on.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
Please don't. If you feel I'm treating you with contempt I think the discussion is simply over.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
If you feel I'm treating you with contempt I think the discussion is simply over. Actually, I'm enjoying it. Don't take me too literally, Faith. I'm just an old joker. I have some things in mind that I think will convince you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Adminnemooseus Administrator Posts: 3976 Joined: |
And joy - It looks like robinrohan and Faith have managed to once again string together at least 3 messages each, that had absolutely no connection to the theme of the topic. Didn't I suspend you two for something along those lines once before?
Take any responses to this message to the "General..." topic, link below (no new apology topic). Adminnemooseus This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 12-23-2005 11:47 PM New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures Thread Reopen Requests Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC and Assistance w/ Forum Formatting |
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024