Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   December 2005, Posts of the Month
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 7 of 71 (265445)
12-04-2005 12:46 PM


TimChase at "A Test for Intelligent Design Proponents"
Name: TimChase
Forum: Intelligent Design
Thread: A Test for Intelligent Design Proponents
Post #: 105
Now that isn't something which we need to debate, but nevertheless, it is something which I regard as symptomatic of a more fundamental problem which exists in the intelligent design movement -- and this is a tension between its attempt to appear scientific and the essentially religious nature of the ideology.
In essence, the old earth creationists (who are willing to admit that the earth is perhaps as old as 4.5 billion years) are being pulled in the direction of science -- at least in comparison to the young earth creationists (who hold that the earth is not much older than roughly 10,000 years) who are holding firm with a more literal interpretation of the Bible.
Now this is not to say that the old earth creationists are actually being scientific, but rather, they are permitting science to determine more of the content of their beliefs. The real tension, however, is between the objectivity required by science and the faith required by religion. This tension is created by the very attempt to make God an object of both domains. For the belief in this God to be scientific, it must be falsifiable by reference to evidence. However, for the belief in this God to be a matter of faith, it must be something which one believes in independently of evidence. The standards of science and standards of religion must necessarily come into conflict to the extent that God belongs to both domains.
Repeating:
Now that isn't something which we need to debate, but nevertheless, it is something which I regard as symptomatic of a more fundamental problem which exists in the intelligent design movement...
I think there is something profound there, about the fundamentals of the creation/evolution debate in general.
As always, this topic in the POTM forum is NOT the place to carry on that debate.
Moose

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 18 of 71 (266956)
12-08-2005 6:38 PM


Truthlover at "Christianity Is Broken, but Can Be Fixed"
Name: Truthlover
Forum: Faith and Belief
Thread: Christianity Is Broken, but Can Be Fixed
Post #: 136
Viewing this message without having followed the topic, but there sure seems to be something heavy there. Probably should also read up thread, both at the cited topic and the other topic(s) TL has been involved in.
Moose

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by truthlover, posted 12-14-2005 10:11 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 48 of 71 (271764)
12-22-2005 3:20 PM


Percy at "The state of ID/YECism here at EvC"
Name: Percy
Forum: Social Issues and Creation/Evolution
Thread: The state of ID/YECism here at EvC
Post #: 19
Moose

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 51 of 71 (273027)
12-26-2005 8:28 PM


Omnivorous, at "George W. Bush Impeachment Poll by MSNBC" topic
Name: Omnivorous
Forum: Coffee House
Thread: George W. Bush Impeachment Poll by MSNBC
Post #: 6 - Keep Bush, Take the Senate
Moose

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Omnivorous, posted 12-26-2005 10:02 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 53 of 71 (273562)
12-28-2005 3:29 PM


A trio from Mini Ditki
All posted 12/28/05, within about 2 1/2 hours.
In order of posting:
Forum: Announcements
Thread: Attention All EvC Members
Post #: 25
As someone who has been a lurker, but not a poster, for many months let me tell you that this board serves a great purpose.
Another testimony that the main useful function of this forum may well be the presenting of information to the lurkers.
Name: Mini Ditki
Forum: Coffee House
Thread: Abortion
Post #: 213
It seems to me that being against sexual education and birth control is to directly support unwanted pregnancy and to indirectly support an increased number of abortions.
If you are REALLY pro-life life then you MUST be pro birth-control.
No further comment.
Name: Mini Ditki
Forum: Dates and Dating
Thread: Dating from the Adams and Eves Threads
Post #: 229
Science is NOT atheist, it is non-theist. Science has no opinion on god. The existence or non-existence of god is completely irrelevant to science.
Off-topic (or is it?) in that most muddled of topics, and nothing that hasn't been said many, many times before. But I think this is probably the most fundamental point of the evolutionist side of the argument.
Remember, the POTM forum topics are not the place to debate the issues. In the above cases, 2 of the 3 topics may also not be the best places to debate the presented themes.
Moose
Added by edit: Mini Ditka has taken the themes of numbers 1 and 3 above, to messages 153 and 154 of the "The Evolution of " topic. That newer location is probably a preferred place to be discussing those themes. That said, the admin-mode has suggested the possibilty of taking the theme of number 3 to a "Great Debate".
This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 12-28-2005 05:01 PM

Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Evolution - Changes in the environment, caused by the interactions of the components of the environment.
"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." - Bruce Graham

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by macaroniandcheese, posted 12-29-2005 12:01 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 56 of 71 (274011)
12-29-2005 9:42 PM


JonF, on determining decay rates and half lives
Name: JonF
Forum: Dates and Dating
Thread: Dating from the Adams and Eves Threads
Post #: 254
It's not normal to pass out POTM nominations for messages whose content is largely a quotation from a reference, but I'm going to do it beause, well, it was some fresh information that I don't recall having seen around here before. I think I may even have learned something, and it's not easy for someone to pound some knowledge into a moose skull.
Moose

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024