Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,465 Year: 3,722/9,624 Month: 593/974 Week: 206/276 Day: 46/34 Hour: 2/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution
mark24
Member (Idle past 5217 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 20 of 302 (273244)
12-27-2005 2:09 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by AdminNWR
12-27-2005 10:58 AM


Re: Mark24 at a "Great Debate" topic he shouldn't have posted in
AdminNWR,
n this case I left the first of the mark24 posts untouched, since Carico had already responded. For the second, the content is mostly still there, visible via "Peek", but masked to not display.
I didn't realise this, & in which case there is no harm done. I'll just repost in the thread that I wanted Carico to respond in.
My real objection was that, although I was as a "point of law" in the wrong, that my work & the time it took to write it was gone. Given that this isn't the case, I have no objection.
Also, I could have sworn that it wasn't a great debate when I checked earlier, I just looked & it is, so I'm doubly wrong & need new glasses.
Mark
This message has been edited by mark24, 12-27-2005 02:11 PM

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by AdminNWR, posted 12-27-2005 10:58 AM AdminNWR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Adminnemooseus, posted 12-27-2005 2:21 PM mark24 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024