Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,348 Year: 3,605/9,624 Month: 476/974 Week: 89/276 Day: 17/23 Hour: 3/8


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Nature and the fall of man
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 46 of 300 (273270)
12-27-2005 4:08 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by robinrohan
12-27-2005 3:02 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
Evolution doeesn't seem to be a perfect system to me.
Perfect systems exist only in mathematics and in the imagination.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by robinrohan, posted 12-27-2005 3:02 PM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Faith, posted 12-27-2005 4:14 PM nwr has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 47 of 300 (273273)
12-27-2005 4:14 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by nwr
12-27-2005 4:08 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
Interesting how mathematics and the imagination are all that continue to reflect the (pre-Fall) Original Perfection then.
This message has been edited by Faith, 12-27-2005 04:42 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 4:08 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 4:29 PM Faith has replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 48 of 300 (273275)
12-27-2005 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Faith
12-27-2005 4:14 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
Interesting how mathematics and the imagination are all that continues to reflect the (pre-Fall) Original Perfection then.
The "(pre-Fall) Original Perfection" is imagination.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Faith, posted 12-27-2005 4:14 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Faith, posted 12-27-2005 4:36 PM nwr has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 49 of 300 (273276)
12-27-2005 4:36 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by nwr
12-27-2005 4:29 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
This bit of absolute dogma you know by divine revelation perhaps?
This message has been edited by Faith, 12-27-2005 04:41 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 4:29 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 4:43 PM Faith has replied
 Message 51 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 4:55 PM Faith has replied
 Message 61 by ramoss, posted 12-27-2005 7:08 PM Faith has not replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 50 of 300 (273278)
12-27-2005 4:43 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Faith
12-27-2005 4:36 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
"Perfect" is our word. We say something is perfect when it matches some ideal that we have. We know, from experience, that the physical world could not ever match our ideals, so could not be perfect.
It is not up to us to dictate to God what He should consider perfect.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Faith, posted 12-27-2005 4:36 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Faith, posted 12-27-2005 4:55 PM nwr has replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 51 of 300 (273279)
12-27-2005 4:55 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Faith
12-27-2005 4:36 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
Hmm. You edited that. The earlier version, to which I had replied in Message 50 was:
quote:
This you know by divine revelation perhaps?
This message has been edited by Faith, 12-27-2005 04:36 PM
As of this moment, it reads:
quote:
This bit of absolute dogma you know by divine revelation perhaps?
This message has been edited by Faith, 12-27-2005 04:41 PM
I wonder what it will say the next time I look.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Faith, posted 12-27-2005 4:36 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Faith, posted 12-27-2005 4:57 PM nwr has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 52 of 300 (273280)
12-27-2005 4:55 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by nwr
12-27-2005 4:43 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
"Perfect" is our word. We say something is perfect when it matches some ideal that we have. We know, from experience, that the physical world could not ever match our ideals, so could not be perfect.
Do you believe with jar that the system is perfect, just not the products of the system, or with robinrohan that that's a logical non sequitur?
It is not up to us to dictate to God what He should consider perfect.
Or course not. He Himself is the only perfection. His Creation was once perfect too, however, until the Fall. But some think that this broken world is REALLY perfect as is, disease, death and all. It's all Nature to the nature-worshipers. I gather at least you don't believe that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 4:43 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 4:59 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 53 of 300 (273281)
12-27-2005 4:57 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by nwr
12-27-2005 4:55 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
Sorry, I do have a habit of rethinking my posts, and don't always put in the "ABE" signal that I've done so. But the idea is the same, simply more pithily worded I hope.
But I don't want to take this thread from robinrohan. He was doing a very entertaining job of dealing with his opponents.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 4:55 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by robinrohan, posted 12-27-2005 4:59 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 57 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 5:02 PM Faith has not replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 54 of 300 (273282)
12-27-2005 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Faith
12-27-2005 4:55 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
Do you believe with jar that the system is perfect, ...
No. As I suggested in Message 46, perfection cannot be found in the real world.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Faith, posted 12-27-2005 4:55 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Faith, posted 12-27-2005 5:01 PM nwr has not replied
 Message 58 by robinrohan, posted 12-27-2005 5:09 PM nwr has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 300 (273283)
12-27-2005 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by Faith
12-27-2005 4:57 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
But I don't want to take this thread from robinrohan
Please continue. I'm tired.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Faith, posted 12-27-2005 4:57 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1463 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 56 of 300 (273284)
12-27-2005 5:01 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by nwr
12-27-2005 4:59 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
No. As I suggested in Message 46, perfection cannot be found in the real world.
You're right, I should have left you to argue with jar and not intervened.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 4:59 PM nwr has not replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 57 of 300 (273285)
12-27-2005 5:02 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by Faith
12-27-2005 4:57 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
Sorry, I do have a habit of rethinking my posts, ...
There's nothing wrong with editing. I was just a little amused by your insertion of "absolute dogma". That's the kind of wording I am likely to delete when I rethink a post.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Faith, posted 12-27-2005 4:57 PM Faith has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 300 (273288)
12-27-2005 5:09 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by nwr
12-27-2005 4:59 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
No. As I suggested in Message 46, perfection cannot be found in the real world
So what's your position? In this context, you can choose Faith's position or Jar's.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 4:59 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by nwr, posted 12-27-2005 5:28 PM robinrohan has not replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 59 of 300 (273293)
12-27-2005 5:28 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by robinrohan
12-27-2005 5:09 PM


Re: the best of all possible worlds
So what's your position? In this context, you can choose Faith's position or Jar's.
Evolution works very well, but it is not perfect.
Jar is a little unrealistic in crediting perfection. But he is not nearly as unrealistic as Faith.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by robinrohan, posted 12-27-2005 5:09 PM robinrohan has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3476 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 60 of 300 (273308)
12-27-2005 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by robinrohan
12-27-2005 3:29 PM


quote:
Mankind didn't create the plague.
I didn't say they did, but their lifestyle at the time, gave it food to grow.
OP writes:
So this view explains that the reason for human suffering due to events in nature is that man brought such a state of affairs on himself. It is all the fault of mankind.
Natural disasters happened before mankind's time and during mankind's time. Sometimes they affect a few creatures, sometimes all creatures.
It has nothing to do with man's behavior. It is just the way the world works.
OP writes:
If the current state of nature is not due to the Fall, then what is it due to? Why does God permit these terrible natural events to occur?
If he didn't stop them before mankind, why stop them after?
Natural disasters are part of living on this planet. Gotta take the good with the bad.
Just because we think we are more important than anything else on the planet, doesn't mean we are.

There are two ways of spreading light: to be the candle or the mirror that reflects it. -Edith Wharton

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by robinrohan, posted 12-27-2005 3:29 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by robinrohan, posted 12-28-2005 7:46 AM purpledawn has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024