General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution

What difference does it make if someone is a designated or non-designated member if he is speaking the truth? Isn't a desire for the truth the most important factor here? Or do people not know what the truth is and have to rely on the status of a member to tell them what it is? Thank you.

Again, I was given a warning for posting off-topic in the thread about Why has God not given us proof of his existence? My post explained that through the believers in God, He is showing his existence as stated in 2 Corinthians 5:20, "We are therefore, Christ's ambassadors as if God were making his appeal through us." My post was indeed relevant to the topic so the warning I received had nothing to do with being off-topic, but simply the desire to not want to hear God's word. The propensity for the non-creationist moderators on this forum to drum up reasons to suspend or ban Christians is obvious by the fact that most of those who have been suspended or banned are creationists. This statistic shows much bias as does the fact that the warnings I've received don't apply to my posts at all. They are simply attempts to squelch the Word of God. This has happened to me repeatedly even though I have been right on topic with every post I've made, but I've seen MANY off-topic posts by evolutionists, including flaming and blatant lying which have been completely left alone. So if you consider yourselves open-minded, then you need to demonstrate this through your actions rather than just your words. Otherwise, they are just empty statements.

I also want to add that I was just browsing through the common ancestry thread in Human Origins and the posters are talking more about me behind my back when I am not allowed to reply to them than they are about the topic of the thread. They are definitely flaming and off-topic but of course are not warned about it. So this simply proves the bias the moderators have against God's word. It also shows that the reasons for suspending people are bogus and merely a disguise for merely getting rid of posters who don't agree with them. People are allowed to post the lie that apes and humans can interbreed as Nuggins clearly said in bold capital letters, but try to get rid of anyone who will not accept those lies or slander. This only re-enforces that this forum openly endorses lies and slander and has no regard for looking at all sides of an issue, because people who point out the inconsistencies of the theory of evolution are banned. I, for one, consider it a compliment that I am not accepted on this forum because I don't value lies or slander.This message has been edited by Carico, 01-03-2006 11:49 PM

But every single one of my posts have been on topic and that's what is unjust here. I have not talked about anyone behind his back, nor have I wandered off the topic. Not once. So why am I singled out and others can flame and wander off-topic?This message has been edited by Carico, 01-04-2006 08:45 AM