Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,848 Year: 4,105/9,624 Month: 976/974 Week: 303/286 Day: 24/40 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   2/3rds of Americans want creationism taught.
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5060 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 181 of 253 (248936)
10-04-2005 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by randman
08-31-2005 2:27 AM


Re: rhetoric like a brick wall
Despite the substitute to consensus science still a bit contrived or manufactured , since attempts to "beef it up" during the 70s, I find RUSE'S "2+2=4" to be artifically selected whether manufacturable or not and becausethe disgreement is on so simple a level I hit this flashed flask like a ton of bricks but still keep on going.
See
Kansas Schools in the News | The Institute for Creation Research
When is 2/3 of the aggregate demand for good eduction NOT equal to 4 made from 2 recursed on itself a time or so. I dont know and I dont understand why Ruse insists on the fingered solute and salute unless he is stuck in Lewontin's TRIPLE HELIX. No tie here.
I am with the 2/3 if the manufacture is actually the other way around.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by randman, posted 08-31-2005 2:27 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by randman, posted 12-31-2005 4:37 PM Brad McFall has not replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 182 of 253 (274263)
12-30-2005 6:14 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by randman
09-01-2005 2:42 PM


Re: Let's vote on the facts?
In fact, the vast majority of research by evolutionists is not research to validate ToE since they assume it as a given, but they research various areas and apply the ToE assumption to the research.
If the ToE was wrong their research wouldn't even WORK!! By admitting that scientists can assume the ToE is true and then build on top of it to do successful research you are ADMITTING that the ToE is functionally right. Wow, it's funny when people don't realize they are arguing against themselves

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by randman, posted 09-01-2005 2:42 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by randman, posted 12-31-2005 4:41 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 183 of 253 (274264)
12-30-2005 6:17 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by randman
09-01-2005 2:53 PM


Re: thanks for your honesty
It's refreshing to hear an evolutionist just come out with it and be honest instead of pretending that overtly creationist articles could be accepted instead of dismissed a priori out of hand.
Well, let's include faith healing in a medical journal.....
Or even better... Let's include the mountain of evidence falsifying much of the bible in religious journals.... or would those be rejected out of hand?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by randman, posted 09-01-2005 2:53 PM randman has not replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 184 of 253 (274270)
12-30-2005 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 161 by Phat
09-02-2005 3:22 AM


Re: Sorry to speculate and sound arrogant, but..
I have actually never met anyone who fervantly feels a relational connection with pink unicorns, magic fairies or flying monsters of any chef! I have read about such people in psychological writings, but there are not too many around. You honestly have not actually prayed with or met any fervant Christians who fervantly knew that they had a relational connection with God? We both need to get out more!
There was also someone who though lennon was the anti-christ.... and how about the ufo cult that all commited suicide... im sure there are many more...
It's funny, but this relates to the OP showing that the majority is not always right or even halfway intelligent.
This message has been edited by Mini_Ditka, 12-30-2005 06:50 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by Phat, posted 09-02-2005 3:22 AM Phat has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 185 of 253 (274443)
12-31-2005 4:30 PM
Reply to: Message 161 by Phat
09-02-2005 3:22 AM


Re: Sorry to speculate and sound arrogant, but..
quote:
I have actually never met anyone who fervantly feels a relational connection with pink unicorns, magic fairies or flying monsters of any chef! I have read about such people in psychological writings, but there are not too many around.
I have met many people who believe that there is truth in Astrology (let's not forget that Nancy Reagan was a believer), or that aliens have abducted people, or that ghosts exist like they do in the movies.
...and there have been others who believe that demons possess people, or that some supernatural spirit fills them when they pray hard enough.
I don't see much difference.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by Phat, posted 09-02-2005 3:22 AM Phat has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4926 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 186 of 253 (274445)
12-31-2005 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by Brad McFall
10-04-2005 7:07 PM


Re: rhetoric like a brick wall
Oops, edit to change ...I thought you referred to Michael Ruse. Yea, the whole claim of evolution is as true as 2 plus 2 equals 4 shows how far removed the minds of evolutionists are from real science. It's a shame, but they are not educating people, but indoctrinating them.
This message has been edited by randman, 12-31-2005 04:39 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by Brad McFall, posted 10-04-2005 7:07 PM Brad McFall has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by nator, posted 01-01-2006 6:55 AM randman has not replied
 Message 200 by Admin, posted 01-01-2006 8:36 AM randman has replied
 Message 201 by mark24, posted 01-01-2006 9:00 AM randman has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4926 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 187 of 253 (274450)
12-31-2005 4:41 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
12-30-2005 6:14 PM


Re: Let's vote on the facts?
It works just the same if you assume ID, creationism or just about anything. In fact, belief in ToE claims has caused harm medically as organs there were not vestigal were claimed as vestigal and useless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 12-30-2005 6:14 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 188 by Nuggin, posted 12-31-2005 5:08 PM randman has not replied
 Message 192 by joshua221, posted 01-01-2006 1:02 AM randman has not replied
 Message 202 by Percy, posted 01-01-2006 9:13 AM randman has replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2520 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 188 of 253 (274462)
12-31-2005 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 187 by randman
12-31-2005 4:41 PM


Re: Let's vote on the facts?
In fact, belief in ToE claims has caused harm medically as organs there were not vestigal were claimed as vestigal and useless.
Let's try to guess at numbers, shall we?
How many people were harmed by the removal of these vestigal organs (btw - which organs are you talking about)?
Now let's compare that to people the number of Christian Scientists who died from simply infections and diarrea simply because they fail to pray hard enough.
Then let's compare that to people cast out of their societies for becoming ill - since clearly God doesn't favor them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by randman, posted 12-31-2005 4:41 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by NosyNed, posted 12-31-2005 5:19 PM Nuggin has not replied
 Message 191 by joshua221, posted 01-01-2006 12:59 AM Nuggin has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 189 of 253 (274470)
12-31-2005 5:19 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by Nuggin
12-31-2005 5:08 PM


definition of vestigial
Something I learned here is the real definition of vestigial. RM was told that but forgot it again I suspect.
That is important to clear up.
He was told that vestigial does not mean useless. Though it doesn't necessarily mean useful either.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by Nuggin, posted 12-31-2005 5:08 PM Nuggin has not replied

  
joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 190 of 253 (274536)
01-01-2006 12:53 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by randman
08-31-2005 1:44 AM


stat garbage can lil wayne style.
I don't believe that statistic at all.
Anyone I know at least at my school believes that evolution is a fact of life. statistics and polls are garbage
But I think that many philosophies about life should be taught in school. Science is not really philosophy, but then again it crosses over sometimes with issues like these. In my AP Bio class, we discuss it sometimes. It's cool, everyone likes to hear about stuff like this. If asked I bring up why I don't think evolution occured using reason, not the bible. ID isn't as religious sometimes as one could think. But I sort of agree with you.
This message has been edited by prophex, 01-01-2006 12:56 AM

"The old man cries in the sorrow of eternity." Van Gogh

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by randman, posted 08-31-2005 1:44 AM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 1:18 AM joshua221 has replied

  
joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 191 of 253 (274537)
01-01-2006 12:59 AM
Reply to: Message 188 by Nuggin
12-31-2005 5:08 PM


Re: Let's vote on the facts?
Rand is right, vestigal organs and bones make me comfortable.
Someone told me that the tail-bone is vestigal. My bio teacher said that if we didn't have it, life would suck. Sitting and stuff. It is also largely used to prove that we have ascended from tail-having organisms. I don't buy that really.

"The old man cries in the sorrow of eternity." Van Gogh

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by Nuggin, posted 12-31-2005 5:08 PM Nuggin has not replied

  
joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 192 of 253 (274538)
01-01-2006 1:02 AM
Reply to: Message 187 by randman
12-31-2005 4:41 PM


Re: Let's vote on the facts?
Yeah people hate what they haven't seen yet I guess, maybe, I dunno, that's mean. Lots of people that are smart, tell me that religion is the root of all evil. That's stoopid but off-topic. Nuggin does this alot though. Crash. Brian too. Smart I guess, but they hate religion, it's a wierd phenomenon. phenomenononemeon

"The old man cries in the sorrow of eternity." Van Gogh

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by randman, posted 12-31-2005 4:41 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 1:27 AM joshua221 has replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2520 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 193 of 253 (274543)
01-01-2006 1:18 AM
Reply to: Message 190 by joshua221
01-01-2006 12:53 AM


Aliens
ID isn't as religious sometimes as one could think.
Are you suggesting here that the Intelligent Designer is a force other than the Jewish God? Alien life form maybe?
If so, then you are right, ID doesn't have to rely on religion. Good luck getting the ID supporters to back you on a ciriculum of ET planet seeding.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by joshua221, posted 01-01-2006 12:53 AM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by joshua221, posted 01-01-2006 1:31 AM Nuggin has replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2520 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 194 of 253 (274547)
01-01-2006 1:27 AM
Reply to: Message 192 by joshua221
01-01-2006 1:02 AM


Nuggin says what?
Lots of people that are smart, tell me that religion is the root of all evil. That's stoopid but off-topic. Nuggin does this alot though. Crash. Brian too. Smart I guess, but they hate religion, it's a wierd phenomenon.
Wow, do you have it wrong. I do not hate religion. I fully support religion - I think it's a vital part of human social structure. I think that any attempt to stamp out religion is doomed to failure.
What I do hate is people who want their religion, and only their religion, to be treated as if it were special. No one religion is better than any other. The Jews are not better than the Muslims. The Baptists are not better than the Hindus.
So long as you are not doing harm to others, feel free to worship in any way you like.
My problem with fundies/YECs/IDers is that want to be treated special. They want their religious beliefs to be given priority over everyone elses.
I have no problem with Creationism being taught in schools. Even in the science class - IF equal time is given to all religions. That means the Catholics get just as much time as the Scientologists, the Hindus, the Zoroastrians and the Universal Life Church (of which I am an ordained minister).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by joshua221, posted 01-01-2006 1:02 AM joshua221 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 197 by joshua221, posted 01-01-2006 1:33 AM Nuggin has not replied

  
joshua221 
Inactive Member


Message 195 of 253 (274549)
01-01-2006 1:31 AM
Reply to: Message 193 by Nuggin
01-01-2006 1:18 AM


Re: Aliens
quote:
Are you suggesting here that the Intelligent Designer is a force other than the Jewish God? Alien life form maybe?
no.

"The old man cries in the sorrow of eternity." Van Gogh

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 1:18 AM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 1:32 AM joshua221 has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024