Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,396 Year: 3,653/9,624 Month: 524/974 Week: 137/276 Day: 11/23 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Intelligent tree growth
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1419 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 2 of 9 (275525)
01-03-2006 10:12 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by nwr
01-03-2006 9:41 PM


I agree...
Hi nwr,
I do agree with your assessment. I think we too often look to science as a method to discover truth, but really science is all about utility. That's one of the major reasons why we have Occam's Razor.
I think there's one thing that you didn't mention, but that is implied by your post. I hope it's not far off topic to mention it, but I'll give it a shot and see what you think.
I think the door swings both ways. Just like science, religious belief and faith need not be "true" or "false", "right" or "wrong". What really matters in faith is how it affects you, how it changes you, and how you live your life because of it. In other words, it is the utility of faith that really has meaning. Whether any article is actually true? It never really mattered.
It's like Dumbo and his feather.
In this way then, I see science and faith similar. They are both misconstrued as avenues to "truth". But all that ever really mattered was how we treat each other. The only thing that ever made "truth" matter was our own pointless, made-up ideal.
Fortunately, that ideal turned out to be useful... sometimes.
Ben
P.S. Why do I feel like this post could have been written by brennakimi?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nwr, posted 01-03-2006 9:41 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-03-2006 10:26 PM Ben! has replied
 Message 7 by nwr, posted 01-03-2006 11:15 PM Ben! has replied

  
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1419 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 4 of 9 (275529)
01-03-2006 10:38 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
01-03-2006 10:26 PM


Re: I agree...
I think it's perfectly fine to say, "I think Jesus was the son of god, but even if he wasn't, his teachings are what is really important"
I would probably say something different:
"I believe Jesus was the son of god. If you must judge me, judge me on what I do, not what I believe. I am content in my belief."
So I guess what I'm getting at is, we use "truth" as a method for justification and for judgement. Why did we ever think that "truth" had something to do with utility?
I guess the easy answer is, that it's obvious. Only an idiot would even stop to ask such a silly question.
What a logical fallacy that would be.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-03-2006 10:26 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-03-2006 10:42 PM Ben! has not replied

  
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1419 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 8 of 9 (275543)
01-03-2006 11:19 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by nwr
01-03-2006 11:15 PM


Re: I agree...
Post 2, and we are already drifting off-topic
It couldn't be helped
It became a made-up ideal when we tried to make "truth" an entity in its own right (when we reified it).
Not sure I agree with this, but I don't want to go off-topic on the off-topic discussion. Let's keep to one level of off-topic'dness at a time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by nwr, posted 01-03-2006 11:15 PM nwr has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024