Dear Mark,
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PB: Designed systems can be recognised by (genetic) redundancies. Structures, cells and/or genes present in the organism/genome without selective constraint cannot be explained by evolutionism and point in the direction of design. As elaborated several times before genetic redundancies do not have an association with gene duplications. Genetic redundancies in general are sufficient to bring down evolutionism since they do not demonstrate a relationship with gene duplications. Genetic redundancies leave the evolutionary community with complete surprise and disbelief. Have a look here: (
Nature - Not Found)
So, remember for the next time: GENETIC REDUNDANCIES ARE CLEARCUT EVIDENCE FOR DESIGN.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M: Well, that would be true if you can positively rule out other explanations. Can you?
PB: At least, you are starting to concur that evolutionism is untenable in the light of these data.
M: Remember, this is your assertion, no "well, explain it from an evolutionary POV" arguments please. Positively back up your claim that genetic redundancies ARE evidence of design, by way of ruling out evolution, & other explanations such as perpetual existance (Well if god can have existed forever, why not life, lurking in some backwater vacuum?)
PB: In one of my first mails I claimed that I would bring doubt upon evolutionism and I did that. To free your mind. That was the goal. Mission accomplished.
Now, let's find more evidence for the GUToB. Maybe we could discuss redundant CpG DNA in bacteria that specificly evoces an immuneresponse in higher organisms. Design, my friend.
Best wishes,
Peter