2. Does human DNA contain the sum total of all the DNA that has gone before us. In other words, can human DNA be "read" as the greatest Natural Biology history text of Earthly fauna there is?
Your cousin has a child by mating with an individual neither of you are related to.
Do you suddenly gain any portion of that individual's genes, even though you're related to their offspring? No. Neither does human DNA contain any genes except those we inherited from our ancestors and those we developed ourselves. So too have all the other species on earth developed genes that we simply don't have. Every single living organism on the planet has gone through just as much evolution as we have; in most cases, considerably more. That's a considerable amount of time for them to develop genetic sequences that have nothing to do with ours.
If humans are at the top of the food chain
There isn't really a food "chain." It's a food web, when you get right down to it. Plants use the sun and nutrients from decomposers in the soil to create sugars; animals eat the sugars; those animals are eaten by other animals, those animals die and are eaten by soil decomposers, those soil decomposers are eaten by plants and combined with energy from the sun to create sugars....
You get the idea. Humans are no more at the top of a food "chain" then they're at the top of an evolutionary "ladder", or indeed, at the top of anything. It's anthrogenic ego of the most common sort, unfortunately.