Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Electro-mechanical engines of Perpetual Motion and Natural Selection
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 202 (28339)
01-03-2003 12:36 AM


About five such engines are shown at http://www.thewebspert.com/cresswell/.
I have put this information in the public domain because I have utter contempt for money and institutionalised 'educators'.
The taxpayer is forking out $300,000,000,000 per annum for oil to wreck their environment. At least the same again to have universities teach their children how to die stupid.
Have faith yes, but not in Gods, Isaac Newton or the Thermodynamic Laws.
I was surprised at the simplicity of the basic principle. Gobsmacked beyond belief to see Darwinian Natural Selection, leap from the surface of my notebooks.
------------------
Alan
[This message has been edited by Alan Cresswell, 01-03-2003]
[This message has been edited by Alan Cresswell, 01-03-2003]

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Percy, posted 01-03-2003 12:48 PM Alan Cresswell has replied
 Message 7 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus, posted 01-03-2003 5:09 PM Alan Cresswell has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22391
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 2 of 202 (28354)
01-03-2003 12:48 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Alan Cresswell
01-03-2003 12:36 AM


While responding to w_fortenberry's advocacy for a geocentric solar system I once rhetorically asked why it was always the Creationists with the weird positions, but apparently Creationists have no such monopoly. Cresswell here apparently advocates Darwinian natural selection *and* abandonment of the laws of thermodynamics.
Alan, we'll believe you're on to something when you've made your first billion in the power generation industry.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Alan Cresswell, posted 01-03-2003 12:36 AM Alan Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Alan Cresswell, posted 01-03-2003 2:41 PM Percy has not replied
 Message 4 by Alan Cresswell, posted 01-03-2003 2:46 PM Percy has replied
 Message 15 by Alan Cresswell, posted 01-05-2003 3:23 AM Percy has replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 202 (28360)
01-03-2003 2:41 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Percy
01-03-2003 12:48 PM


Are you proposing to wait until I make a 'billion' before you are willing to get your brain into gear and make a constructive comment ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Percy, posted 01-03-2003 12:48 PM Percy has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 202 (28362)
01-03-2003 2:46 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Percy
01-03-2003 12:48 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Percipient:
While responding to w_fortenberry's advocacy for a geocentric solar system I once rhetorically asked why it was always the Creationists with the weird positions, but apparently Creationists have no such monopoly. Cresswell here apparently advocates Darwinian natural selection *and* abandonment of the laws of thermodynamics.
Alan, we'll believe you're on to something when you've made your first billion in the power generation industry.
--Percy

Are you poposing to wait until I make a billion of something before you get your brain into gear and say something constructive.
------------------
Alan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Percy, posted 01-03-2003 12:48 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Percy, posted 01-03-2003 4:16 PM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22391
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 5 of 202 (28366)
01-03-2003 4:16 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Alan Cresswell
01-03-2003 2:46 PM


alan cresswell writes:
Are you poposing to wait until I make a billion of something before you get your brain into gear and say something constructive.
I'm proposing that you generate something besides hot air and insults. If you are correct then you should have no problem constructing practical devices illustrating your principles, for example by building power plants that generate cheap power and make you billions of dollars.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Alan Cresswell, posted 01-03-2003 2:46 PM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 6 of 202 (28367)
01-03-2003 4:23 PM


This topic has been moved here from the Big Bang and Cosmology forum.
------------------
--EvC Forum Administrator
[This message has been edited by Admin, 01-03-2003]

  
Dr_Tazimus_maximus
Member (Idle past 3217 days)
Posts: 402
From: Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Joined: 03-19-2002


Message 7 of 202 (28369)
01-03-2003 5:09 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Alan Cresswell
01-03-2003 12:36 AM


Hi Alan, I have only one comment for you concerning figure 1a.....
friction.
------------------
"Chance favors the prepared mind." L. Pasteur
Taz
[This message has been edited by Dr_Tazimus_maximus, 01-03-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Alan Cresswell, posted 01-03-2003 12:36 AM Alan Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Brad McFall, posted 01-03-2003 5:13 PM Dr_Tazimus_maximus has replied
 Message 11 by Alan Cresswell, posted 01-03-2003 5:32 PM Dr_Tazimus_maximus has not replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5032 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 8 of 202 (28370)
01-03-2003 5:13 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus
01-03-2003 5:09 PM


Yeah, I doubt the conditions would work wihout going against the surface in *nanoecology* as I have indicated in other threading lanes criticizing nanotechology. When billions are made then even Feynman would wake from his grave stomach killing virus. Taz- I am in Poolsville right now.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus, posted 01-03-2003 5:09 PM Dr_Tazimus_maximus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus, posted 01-03-2003 5:16 PM Brad McFall has not replied
 Message 12 by Alan Cresswell, posted 01-03-2003 5:43 PM Brad McFall has replied

  
Dr_Tazimus_maximus
Member (Idle past 3217 days)
Posts: 402
From: Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Joined: 03-19-2002


Message 9 of 202 (28371)
01-03-2003 5:16 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Brad McFall
01-03-2003 5:13 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Brad McFall:
Taz- I am in Poolsville right now.
Better than in NY/Conn. I heard that it is snowing like hell up there now. I can deal with snow (5 years in spent driving in Chicago, including for Giordono's pizza delivery) but the people here in the greater DC area can not handle it.
------------------
"Chance favors the prepared mind." L. Pasteur
Taz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Brad McFall, posted 01-03-2003 5:13 PM Brad McFall has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Percy, posted 01-03-2003 5:29 PM Dr_Tazimus_maximus has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22391
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 5.2


Message 10 of 202 (28372)
01-03-2003 5:29 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus
01-03-2003 5:16 PM


Dr_Tazimus_maximus writes:
Better than in NY/Conn. I heard that it is snowing like hell up there now.
Here in NH it is snowing heavily and the forecast is for 10-20". This is what the weather service says about tomorrow:
Saturday
Snow...heavy for a time in the morning. Additional accumulation 2 to 5 inches raising storms totals to between 12 and 24 inches. Cold and brisk. Temperatures steady or slowly falling into the mid 20s. North winds 15 to 25 mph...gusting to 35 mph early in the morning. Chance of snow near 100 percent.
The height of my snowblower is 20", you do the math!
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus, posted 01-03-2003 5:16 PM Dr_Tazimus_maximus has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 202 (28373)
01-03-2003 5:32 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus
01-03-2003 5:09 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Dr_Tazimus_maximus:
Hi Alan, I have only one comment for you concerning figure 1a.....
friction.

Hello Taz,
Have had Gaithersburg NIST dealings in the past. Almost signed up with them 14 years back. That was square one that triggered this. My heat engine cycle was too messy and gave a limited 33% free lunch.
Four years later I ionised the gas and everything fell out. Diagram 2. That was the big break for me. All else followed. I have 4d built today and will let you know how it goes. If the moderator does not pull the site. Indoctrinated kids often insult me in forums and I tend to overkick back.
1a. Friction? Thats it. Thats the output demand on the engine.
------------------
Alan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Dr_Tazimus_maximus, posted 01-03-2003 5:09 PM Dr_Tazimus_maximus has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 202 (28375)
01-03-2003 5:43 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Brad McFall
01-03-2003 5:13 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Brad McFall:
Yeah, I doubt the conditions would work wihout going against the surface in *nanoecology* as I have indicated in other threading lanes criticizing nanotechology. When billions are made then even Feynman would wake from his grave stomach killing virus. Taz- I am in Poolsville right now.
Feynman was a great communicator but I fear I would have made his stomach condition worse. We shall never know. I have tried in vain to contact some of his close surviving friends.
------------------
Alan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Brad McFall, posted 01-03-2003 5:13 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Brad McFall, posted 01-04-2003 12:51 AM Alan Cresswell has replied
 Message 18 by John, posted 01-05-2003 9:57 AM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5032 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001


Message 13 of 202 (28390)
01-04-2003 12:51 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Alan Cresswell
01-03-2003 5:43 PM


You could know that I only object to overly probalistic plausibilities when other more determinate possiblites are clearly avaiable. It is not impossible to build a pedagogy and some invention attempts cardinally into what I understood you have proposed but me coming at this from another direction have found that QM as some nanotechonoligsts have it is NOT AT ALL biologically motiviated such that "good elite intentions" or a philanthropic donation to your cause in another instance could create for the less educated revulsion if a food web collapses because after a frat inition some of the beer gets mixed with the brew. This is not possible to day but I do not play the lottery on the assumption that it could happen in 50yrs. Thanks for the response. I hope this helps.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Alan Cresswell, posted 01-03-2003 5:43 PM Alan Cresswell has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Alan Cresswell, posted 01-05-2003 3:01 AM Brad McFall has replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 202 (28433)
01-05-2003 3:01 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Brad McFall
01-04-2003 12:51 AM


quote:
Originally posted by Brad McFall:
You could know that I only object to overly probalistic plausibilities when other more determinate possiblites are clearly avaiable. It is not impossible to build a pedagogy and some invention attempts cardinally into what I understood you have proposed but me coming at this from another direction have found that QM as some nanotechonoligsts have it is NOT AT ALL biologically motiviated such that "good elite intentions" or a philanthropic donation to your cause in another instance could create for the less educated revulsion if a food web collapses because after a frat inition some of the beer gets mixed with the brew. This is not possible to day but I do not play the lottery on the assumption that it could happen in 50yrs. Thanks for the response. I hope this helps.
I am sure that your comments will prove useful if and when I can get a translation. Are you saying that I should get nanoistically
unbosonized on a Higgsly programme? Are you aware of the hole in the bucket of QM theory? I give you facts not theories.
------------------
Alan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Brad McFall, posted 01-04-2003 12:51 AM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Brad McFall, posted 01-05-2003 11:53 PM Alan Cresswell has not replied

  
Alan Cresswell
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 202 (28435)
01-05-2003 3:23 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Percy
01-03-2003 12:48 PM


Percy,
I have just read your black hole advice to Funky. Do black holes really exist to give out Hawking radiation and evaporate to nothing.
Surely the Universe is far more intelligent than this.
------------------
Alan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Percy, posted 01-03-2003 12:48 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Percy, posted 01-05-2003 8:02 AM Alan Cresswell has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024