So far, you're the only one who is able to see this in the text. Funny that.
Also, if you want to quote me, include the full quote, rather than distorting my words, it's bad form. You quote me as saying
the declaration was written in 1320, so the most you could say about the declaration is that this was what the Scots were saying
What I said was
the declaration was written in 1320, so the most you could say about the declaration is that this was what the Scots were saying, however, nowhere does it say that the Scots didconsider themselves to be the lost tribes of Israel.
You will notice that the completed quote points out that they are, in fact, not claiming this. Do not attribute to me opinions which are diametrically opposed to the position I have actually stated most clearly.
You say
You seem to be asserting the text does not mean what it says.
Actually I'm saying that the text says what it says. It doesn't say what you imagine it to say.
you say
This is a modern Darwinian need as is seen in their handling of the Bible.
Totally irrelevant repetition of your usual ad hominem.
You say
The text/evidence claims ancestry from Hebrews.
The text doesn't say this one little bit and anyone else reading the text can see that. Therefore the text itself is evidence that you're wrong. What doesn't help you is your own source, as jar pointed out.