|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Declaration of Arbroath | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
Scottish Declaration of Independance.
http://www.constitution.org/scot/arbroath.htm
"Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today." All of the Scottish lords who signed the text did so by attaching their seals: http://www.abcog.org/gifs/arbroath.jpg The Scots are claiming to be ancestors of scattered 10 tribe Israel. Ray
promoted reluctantly by AdminJar
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
It seems to say they were Scythians. It doesn't seem to say it...it does say it. Scythians: "booth dwellers". The practice of building a booth to dwell in is Hebrew. During the feast of the Tabernacles Israelites built temporary structures outside their homes to dwell in to remind themselves that they were delivered from Egypt. Scythians means sons of Isaac. Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
Firstly, the Scots are not claiming to be the lost tribes of Israel These Scottish nobles are claiming what the text SAYS. Their ORIGIN: Hebrews who crossed the Red Sea. Thats why the text mentions this event.
the declaration was written in 1320, so the most you could say about the declaration is that this was what the Scots were saying I am saying the Scots are saying....yes Trixie. They know where they descended from. The text tells us where THEY SAY.
It mentions the Exodus because it may have inclined the Pope to look more favourably on their plea and it's only there to provide an idea of when they claim it took place. Your belief about the fact is false. The Exodus is mentioned because they are claiming to be descendants. [source: Dr. E. Raymond Capt] Of course 1320 predates British Israelism cult. Sycthians = sons of Isaac. You seem to be asserting the text does not mean what it says. This is a modern Darwinian need as is seen in their handling of the Bible. The text/evidence claims ancestry from Hebrews. Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
....and explain why all these Scottish lords attempted to deceive. Denial of Hebrew origin of the Isles is a modern invent/need by secular scholars.
Point one. No where does it claim they were related to the Hebrews. Only if you ignore what it says.
Greater Scythia does not refer to the Hebrews. In fact, the Scythians were not even a semitic peoples. The area was what would be called Azerbijan and the people were Indo-Europeans, closer to those of Iran than to those of Palistine. Scythians are sons of Isaac. They were Celts and semetic/Shemitic = "light skinned peoples" (Dr. Scott). Their origin is north of the Caucasus Mountains, hence "caucasian"/light skinned peoples. Very popular Nordic surname: Isaacson = sons of Isaac.
You provided a link. And your link itself calls the history part of it "laughable fiction". Your very own source goes on to say... The links only purpose was to have a source for the text itself. Calling the text fiction is asserting the evidence is not genuine. What evidence do you have that all these Scottish nobles are wrong ? Ray This message has been edited by Herepton, 02-07-2006 05:52 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
I thought Ray was amusing before; he manages to go even further. (well, maybe not beyond his problem with reading maps but pretty far ) LOL That debate showed how ignorant you were of basic geometry since the height was proven via 3 separate scholars. I can prove the height with atheist scholars alone (5449 polar diameter inches), but we know from the very recent past EvC will not let itself get humliated as is seen in refusing to debate my last PNT. Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
No where in the Declaration is there any claims that the Scots were descended from Hebrews. And if Scotty said that Scythians = Hebrews, well, that only shows once again he didn't have a clue what he was talking about. Ad hom rant against a scholar caused by the inability to refute. You are completely ignorant and expect everyone to hold your unsupported assertions as fact. The text says what it means and proves any evidence proving the Bible is ignored/suppressed just like the Bible claims.
Romans 1:18 NewKJV "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness" ungodly means against recognizing God. unrighteous, in context, means against faith. Who in our society is guilty of the above ? Atheists and Darwinists. What do these persons do ? Verse 18: "....who suppress the truth in unrighteousness" They suppress the truth while hostile to the way of faith = secular society best represented by Jar. Your "argument"/denial proves this verse represents reality = claim of the Bible. Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
Now Ray, where in there does it say that they are claiming descent from Hebrews? The Scottish lords are attempting to secure Papal support.
"Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown." The "renown" history is now going to be outlined:
"They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today." Read the text. Okay. Descent is outlined, from nearest working backwards "Thence they came....after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea" The "they" are then connected to Israel. By including this information the Scots are claiming Hebrew ancestry. Human evolution proceeds with obscure fossil scraps found with no birth certificates/text attached. The information at issue is included in the text because the Scots are claiming their ancient forefathers proceeded: "They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes" The above is then linked with Israel. The only reason it says all of this is because they are claiming ancestry. To assert otherwise is to ignore prima facie evidence. The CLAIM is supported by a universe of other evidence, some of it mentioned briefly and even more quickly ignored. Why was all this information placed in the text unless the Scots were not saying their ancient brothers were Hebrew ? Your reply here has been ad hoc with all due respect. Ray This message has been edited by Herepton, 02-07-2006 07:27 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
To California then they came, forty thousand years after the first Americans crossed the Bering Straits, to their home in the west where they live still. And they are very nice in-laws, too. Did you think I was talking about the First Americans? Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. Do you think God actually meant He created by ape evolution even though the text says no such thing ? Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
Genesis 49:17 Dan shall be a serpent by the way, an adder in the path, that biteth the horse heels, so that his rider shall fall backward. The above verse is a dying Jacob's last words about Dan. Dr. Scott says it is a prophecy, predicting wherever the descendants of Dan travel to - they will leave a "serpents trail", that is they will leave their MARK. Original Hebrew contained no vowels. DAN is DN and could easily be DIN/DEN/DON/DUN. Evidence of the prophecy/Dan's mark: Denmark/Danmark = DAN'S MARK, DANes, DANish. DANube, DANaster, and DANaper rivers. Tuatha de Danaan = tribe of Dan founder of Greek civilization: DANaus “Danaus, the father of fifty daughters on coming to Argos took up his abode in the city of Inarchos and throughout Hellas (i.e., Greece). He laid down the law that all people hitherto named Pelasgians were to be named Danaans” - (Strabo 5.2.40 quoting Euripides). ScanDANavia. Of course Dan was a son of Jacob, son of Isaac = Nordic surname "Isaacson" = sons of Isaac. Remember Dan is also Dun. How many DUN's are their in Britain alone ? Hundreds. Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
Wow, Ray, that's worse than numerology. How on Earth do you get "one who leaves a trail" from "serpent"? All animals leave trails, and I'm willing to bet that if the verse mentioned a different animal, you'd interpret it in the same way. Wishful thinking. Imagine that...a person with the ability to deduce obscure fossil scraps to be as his worldview needs them to be...turning a blind eye to prima facie evidence ? Now we know why Darwinists must rely on physical evidence: it can be manipulated according to their needs, unlike linguistic evidence, which they must simply ignore for obvious reasons. Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
jar, rather than merely repeat your claims, why don't you provide some evidence of them? Because Jar must insist his assertions are evidence. He has, like you have pointed out, made senseless assertion after senseless assertion. All my evidence is face value proof: no special pleading required. Sycthians means sons of Isaac (Dr. Scott). All opposition in this thread simply asserts contrary to what the evidence plainly dictates. Here we have Darwinists, persons claiming to be loyal to evidence, asserting contrary to Dan's mark across Eurasia. Arbroath plainly recounts the "renown" history of the Scots ending with their ancient brethern at the Red Sea. The point is the Scots are CLAIMING ancestry from Israel, but then again all opposition here is basically consistent in the fact that they believe human evolution which has not one prima facie fact in support. Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
The very fact that this was written to the Pope would preclude any such claim. This document was made only 30 years after the Edict of Expulsion when Edward I ordered all Jews out of the Isles. From 1290 until the 1650s there is no record of Jews anywhere in the Isles except in the Domus Conversorum which was a building and ghetto for Jews who converted to Christianity. Major error. You are wrongly assuming all Hebrews are Jews and that all Israelites are Jews. All Jews are Hebrews but not all Hebrews are Jews. "Jews" only appears in Scripture AFTER the spilt of the United Monarchy. Two kingdoms emerged: Northern Kingdom of Israel, capitol of Samaria; Southern Kingdom of Judah, capitol of Jerusalem. ONLY persons from the Southern Kingdom became known as "Jews"/Jewdah/Judah. The Hebrews of the North - 10 tribe Israel are NOT Jews. They are Hebrews. All Jews are Hebrews but not all Hebrews are Jews. When Assyria carried the North away into bondage in 721/2 BC, according to Hosea, God divorced Israel/Nothern Kingdom. These Hebrews NEVER returned to Palestine, but after breaking free of Assyria scattered across Eurasia. THESE "Lost Tribes" is whom Jesus told the disciples to take the gospel first: Ephesians, Galatians, Colossians, etc. etc. They are Celts dwelling in Asia minor and beyond. They will not look like Jews because they are NOT Jews.
Matthew 10 6But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Matthew 15 24But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. House of Israel = Nothern Kingdom. Jesus was the Law Incarnate, God killed Him. Now God can re-marry divorced Israel since the old bag (Mosaic Law) is dead. In fact the law said a woman/(Israel) cannot re-marry until her husband died/(Christ). When Christ rose from the dead: the Celts/Lost Tribes were the first ones to receive the gospel and their descendants (USA/Britain) have carried out the Great Commission to take the same gospel to the world. Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
It's not clear what happened to the lost tribes of Israel Yes it is. Assyria carried them away in 722 BC. Ray
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
London = LonDAN
1Chron. 2:6 The sons of Zerah were Zimri, Ethan, Heman, Calcol, and Darda Brutus/British = son of Darda/DARDANUS, son of Judah, founded Troy. Brutus made his way to the Isles via ships controlled by DANites.
Judges 5:17 Gilead abode beyond Jordan: and why did Dan remain in ships? This is why many rivers and port locales have the name "DAN" in them. Ray This message has been edited by Herepton, 02-10-2006 02:18 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cold Foreign Object  Suspended Member (Idle past 3075 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: |
In Genesis 38, Zarah, a birthright twin, was born.
His descendants made their way to Spain after being ejected from the Delta by a "Pharoah who knew not Joseph." http://www.red2000.com/spain/zaragoza/ ZARAgoza, Spain "Old Iberians" = Iberia/Ibrew/Hebrew. Hebrew means "wanderer" as they wandered all over Eurasia and founded Western culture. Didn't know any of this ? = power of Satan as seen in his ability to control secular historians from reporting these facts. Either way the Bible is proven true: Satan or Hebrews in Europe. Ray This message has been edited by Herepton, 02-10-2006 02:36 PM
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024