Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,469 Year: 3,726/9,624 Month: 597/974 Week: 210/276 Day: 50/34 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Karl Rove: Traitor?
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 186 of 271 (226061)
07-24-2005 10:23 PM
Reply to: Message 185 by Chiroptera
07-24-2005 9:30 PM


Re: Featuring Alberto Gonzales in the role of Rosemary Wood
Good evening, folks. No better time to make my debut, I suppose.
My understanding is that White House officials (or anyone else)have no legal onus to preserve intra-staff communcations unless there is official notice of an investigation.
Nixon could have perfectly legally destroyed his tapes at any time prior to the Congressional subpoena to produce them, thus the perennial puzzlement over why he did not.
If Gonzales gave an informal heads-up prior to official notification, he may have become part of a conspiracy to obstruct justice.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 185 by Chiroptera, posted 07-24-2005 9:30 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by berberry, posted 07-24-2005 11:03 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 189 of 271 (226080)
07-25-2005 12:04 AM
Reply to: Message 187 by berberry
07-24-2005 11:03 PM


Re: Featuring Alberto Gonzales in the role of Rosemary Wood
berberry writes:
quote:
yes, you're exactly right.
I've been lurking long enough to know I won't hear that very often!
Thank you for the welcome. It is a pleasure to find such a ferociously intelligent forum.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by berberry, posted 07-24-2005 11:03 PM berberry has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by arachnophilia, posted 07-25-2005 12:10 AM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 191 of 271 (226082)
07-25-2005 12:19 AM
Reply to: Message 190 by arachnophilia
07-25-2005 12:10 AM


Re: Featuring Alberto Gonzales in the role of Rosemary Wood
arachnopilia writes:
quote:
well, make this two times: you're exactly right. however, this next bit could use some editting to adequately reflect the current debates:
It is a pleasure to find such a ferociously intelligent forum.

You're exactly wry.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by arachnophilia, posted 07-25-2005 12:10 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by arachnophilia, posted 07-25-2005 12:28 AM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 197 of 271 (226821)
07-27-2005 3:27 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by berberry
07-25-2005 9:50 PM


Re: Can you believe: Congress to hold hearings!
berbery writes:
quote:
No wonder right-wing liars need so desperately to discredit this guy. But he's not the only one; they've certainly got their smear work cut out for them, eh?
As the CM Trio sang about the John Birch Society, "Help us fill the ranks/To get this movement started/We need lots of tools and cranks..."
So on a day distinguished by reports that Fitzgerald has also questioned Bush administration officials about efforts to shift blame for those infamous yellow cake assertions, Fox News reports that Varlerie Plame "dontated to an anti-Bush" organization...as Valerie P. Wilson! (emphasis added)
In the report we learn she bought two tickets to a fund-raising Springsteen concert. To our even greater horror, we are informed that on the donation form she listed her occupation as "Retired" (wrly, perhaps?), and wrote in "N.A." for employer: we even have a solemn quote about how one shouldn't falsify such forms...guess she should have written "CIA Operative, Nonofficial Cover."
I mean, how can you believe anything her husband says once you know about the stygian ethical darkness his wife embraces?
I'm still searching for the equally breathless Fox coverage of Fitzgerald's widening investigation.
This message has been edited by Omnivorous, 07-27-2005 03:28 PM
This message has been edited by Omnivorous, 07-27-2005 03:30 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by berberry, posted 07-25-2005 9:50 PM berberry has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by berberry, posted 07-28-2005 3:00 AM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 202 of 271 (228592)
08-01-2005 7:53 PM
Reply to: Message 201 by arachnophilia
08-01-2005 6:20 PM


Re: not treason, though
I don't think the presence or lack of a declared war is necessary to a charge of treason, though historically we have been more gallows happy during wartime.
Guess I should have threaded this reply to Tal, since I feel a brief rant coming on...
Nixon wasted thousands of lives in a folly-driven war he didn't start but opened the door to China; on social issues he would be considered a liberal by today's right-skewed political spectrum.
Bush started the folly of a counterproductive war under false pretenses and has wasted thousands of lives; he has no redeeming virtues that I can detect.
Compare and contrast? Nixon was sleazy and smart. Bush is sleazy and stupid.
As we approach the mid-point of his second term (here goes a political prediction), watch how Bush maneuvers to keep his presidential records and fingerprints away from historians, yea, even unto the fourth generation.
History will not be kind to this little man.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by arachnophilia, posted 08-01-2005 6:20 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 203 by jar, posted 08-01-2005 8:10 PM Omnivorous has replied
 Message 205 by arachnophilia, posted 08-01-2005 9:33 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 204 of 271 (228606)
08-01-2005 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by jar
08-01-2005 8:10 PM


Re: not treason, though
jar writes:
quote:
Re: not treason, though
quote:
As we approach the mid-point of his second term (here goes a political prediction), watch how Bush maneuvers to keep his presidential records and fingerprints away from historians, yea, even unto the fourth generation.
Kinda like daddy had Reagan do for him?
Exactly.
Many contemporary observers are puzzled about apparently trivial documents classified as Secret by the Bush administration: e.g., documents pried from their fingers via the FOIA have passages blacked out that are already in the public record, documents already on .gov web sites are withheld, etc.
I suspect the vast forest of spurious secrets helps to conceal the trees they most desperately want to hide. Of course, the Bushies have been hiding so much so long, part of the process is just habit.
Gov. Bush's records get spirited off; documents disappear from his military service file. If you think Hillary's billing records proved elusive, just watch the next couple of years at the White House and the Depts. of Justice and Defense, esp. if the polls show a likely Democrat victory in 2008.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by jar, posted 08-01-2005 8:10 PM jar has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 206 of 271 (228613)
08-01-2005 9:40 PM
Reply to: Message 205 by arachnophilia
08-01-2005 9:33 PM


Re: not treason, though
Oops...nothing makes me over-earnest faster than Bush: as a vet, I find his posturing on war and patriotism especially disgusting.
Sorry 'bout that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by arachnophilia, posted 08-01-2005 9:33 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by arachnophilia, posted 08-01-2005 9:48 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 227 of 271 (256500)
11-03-2005 11:46 AM
Reply to: Message 226 by berberry
11-03-2005 3:31 AM


Re: Forging The Case For War
dietrologia
What a lovely word!
I found this:
from "What Really Happened":
Dietrologia is the Italian word for the science of what is behind. Italians never believe things at face value. There is always something hidden behind it which provides the real explanation. The science of finding these hidden explanations is dietrologia (from dietro= behind), an expression coined in the 1980s. "Usually this concerns the background of sinister events: bribery; corruption; the misuse of power for private benefit; crooked politicians."
ABE: It appeals to my Sicilian fraction.
This message has been edited by Omnivorous, 11-03-2005 11:47 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 226 by berberry, posted 11-03-2005 3:31 AM berberry has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 228 of 271 (285604)
02-10-2006 1:52 PM


Hotdiggity! Cheney ordered leak of classified info?!
A number of us have suspected Cheney's hand in this affair from the beginning. Perhaps there is nothing like prosecution to focus a man's mind on the truth.
Libby Says 'Superiors' Authorized Leaks
Cheney's former aide told a jury that classified information he gave to journalists was OKd.
By Richard B. Schmitt, Times Staff Writer
WASHINGTON ” Former vice presidential aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby has told a federal grand jury that his "superiors" authorized him to leak highly sensitive intelligence to journalists, including a New York Times reporter he allegedly tipped off to the name of an undercover CIA operative.
The revelation is contained in a Jan. 23 letter from Special Prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald to lawyers for Libby, who was indicted in late October in connection with the leak of the operative's name. In the letter, Fitzgerald recounts testimony in which Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff admitted circulating portions of the National Intelligence Estimate to reporters in June and July 2003.
See full LA Times report here.]
This message has been edited by Omnivorous, 02-10-2006 02:19 PM

"Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?"
-Sir Toby Belch, Twelfth Night
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

Replies to this message:
 Message 229 by randman, posted 02-10-2006 6:18 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 231 of 271 (285737)
02-10-2006 7:24 PM
Reply to: Message 229 by randman
02-10-2006 6:18 PM


Re: Hotdiggity! Cheney ordered leak of classified info?!
Well, Rand, that has been a GOP talking point since the early days, one that has been thoroughly refuted by the simple fact of her status at the Company. I am relieved to know the VP has the authority to waive national security laws when WH political fortunes are at stake. It makes me feel so...safe.
As to no other crimes being committed...
Richardson? Did you mean Fitzgerald? Fitzgerald merely said he would only use this particular material as narrative context for his prosecution of Scooter, not that no other crimes had been committed.
Prosecutors and grand juries determine whether indictments are warranted. Pretrial procedures often reveal additional information that results in new indictments (witness the nervously turned GOP heads in Washington when Scanlon turned on Abramoff), esp. when those under present indictment begin to absorb the reality of criminal proceedings and start cutting deals with the prosecution.
I understand a grand jury is still impanelled. I wonder why that is?

"Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?"
-Sir Toby Belch, Twelfth Night
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by randman, posted 02-10-2006 6:18 PM randman has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 235 of 271 (286225)
02-13-2006 3:11 PM
Reply to: Message 234 by Tal
02-13-2006 2:58 PM


Re: Hotdiggity! Cheney ordered leak of classified info?!
No, it was not a crime, or it would be in the charges. Remember, he hasn't purjured himself or obstructed justice until it is proven.
Interesting logic, Tal.
You surely don't believe that all crimes turn up in indictments?
Prosecutors are strategists; they often will not complicate a strong case on one charge with difficult to prove charges. The presence of a charge in the indictment is suggestive of a crime having been committed, though not proof, as you point out; but the absence of a charge in the indictment does not prove that a crime was not committed, or even that the prosecutor does not believe a crime was committed.
Also, if we give the assertions of Libby's defense team any credence, those responsible for the leak are only now being identified.
The grand jury is still impaneled. The door is still open.

"Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?"
-Sir Toby Belch, Twelfth Night
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 234 by Tal, posted 02-13-2006 2:58 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 236 by Tal, posted 02-13-2006 3:32 PM Omnivorous has replied
 Message 239 by randman, posted 02-14-2006 2:10 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 237 of 271 (286237)
02-13-2006 4:18 PM
Reply to: Message 236 by Tal
02-13-2006 3:32 PM


Re: Hotdiggity! Cheney ordered leak of classified info?!
It is commonly referred to as innocent until proven guilty.
True: the only citizens not considered innocent until proven guilty in the U.S. are the ones ordered locked up indefinitely by Bush without recourse to habeas corpus, lawyers, or courts.
Still, my bad, Tal--I was ambiguous in my reference: my comment on your "interesting logic" was aimed at your assertion that if no charges were brought, then no crime was committed. I agree that innocent until proven guilty is a fine standard. I look forward to the trial(s).
Keep your fingers crossed, but if I were a betting man I would say that if the prosecution could charge anyone with the leak, they would have done so by now.
Previously, we had a far murkier situation, with the VP CoS claiming that any release of classified material was inadvertent and involved info everyone in Washington already knew (i.e., Valerie Plame's employment at the CIA), and claiming that it was done only to clarify the lack of relationship between Cheney and Wilson. Remember that spin? How many spins ago that was!
Now, for the first time, we have made public a statement by that same VP chief of staff claiming that his "superiors authorized" him to divulge classified information for political purposes. I don't know about you, but when my superiors "authorized" something, they wanted it done, and the VP does not have the authority to declassify intelligence information.
I agree that a man whose fingerprints are found at a murder scene is innocent until proven guilty, but I wouldn't want my grand-daughter to date him before the trial .
My fingers aren't crossed--I'll leave that to the WH when they issue their dodge 'em statements. But my suspicions are strengthened, as my OP and its title make clear.
We'll see what Fitzgerald and the grand jury make of this, but a majority of the American people have already concluded that the Bush administration is not an honest one, as reflected by his low ratings in opinion polls on the issue.
This message has been edited by Omnivorous, 02-13-2006 04:21 PM

"Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?"
-Sir Toby Belch, Twelfth Night
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 236 by Tal, posted 02-13-2006 3:32 PM Tal has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 240 by randman, posted 02-14-2006 2:21 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 243 of 271 (286567)
02-14-2006 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 240 by randman
02-14-2006 2:21 PM


Re: Hotdiggity! Cheney ordered leak of classified info?!
As you can imagine, Rand, I agree with almost none of what you had to say. But we've been over all that before.
So I am content to note that a growing majority of the American people feel, as I do, that Bush is dishonest and untrustworthy.
Several years ago my conservative friends (yes, I have some) jeered at my prediction that this one wasn't gonna go away. They're not jeering now--they're figuring out how to distance other Republican candidates from Bush later this year.
As to the Republican dream that Libby will be the only indictment that comes out of this perversion of executive responsibility...
Dream on. We'll see.

"Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?"
-Sir Toby Belch, Twelfth Night
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 240 by randman, posted 02-14-2006 2:21 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 247 by Tal, posted 02-16-2006 3:16 PM Omnivorous has replied
 Message 249 by randman, posted 02-16-2006 4:15 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 248 of 271 (287383)
02-16-2006 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 247 by Tal
02-16-2006 3:16 PM


Re: Hotdiggity! Cheney ordered leak of classified info?!
Tal writes:
What perversion was that?

I understand your confusion, Tal--there have been so many!
But I was referring to the one under discussion in this thread.
This message has been edited by Omnivorous, 02-16-2006 04:04 PM

"Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?"
-Sir Toby Belch, Twelfth Night
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 247 by Tal, posted 02-16-2006 3:16 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 251 by Tal, posted 02-16-2006 5:48 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 252 of 271 (287417)
02-16-2006 6:02 PM
Reply to: Message 251 by Tal
02-16-2006 5:48 PM


Re: Hotdiggity! Cheney ordered leak of classified info?!
Nice try, Tal, but I'm not going to play 20 questions with you.
We've been over this ground. My opinion about what charges have been brought and why--and what charges may yet be brought--are on record in this thread.
If you have some new info or insight to offer, please do, and I will respond.

"Dost thou think because thou art virtuous there shall be no more cakes and ale?"
-Sir Toby Belch, Twelfth Night
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 251 by Tal, posted 02-16-2006 5:48 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by Tal, posted 02-16-2006 6:26 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024