Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   the schizochroal eye (of trilobites): evidence of design
mark24
Member (Idle past 5195 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 20 of 55 (288309)
02-19-2006 6:30 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by randman
02-17-2006 6:46 PM


Re: huge mistake....propaganda
randman,
I suspect Wise is dead on accurate then.
I suspect he is inaccurate.
What about the schizochroal eye exceeds the needs of the trilobites? What about the schizochroal eye evolution is harder to explain than mammalian eye evolution?
Mark
This message has been edited by mark24, 02-19-2006 06:31 AM

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by randman, posted 02-17-2006 6:46 PM randman has not replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5195 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 26 of 55 (288553)
02-20-2006 7:08 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by randman
02-20-2006 12:23 AM


Re: disagree very much
randman,
What about the schizochroal eye exceeds the needs of the trilobites? What about the schizochroal eye evolution is harder to explain than mammalian eye evolution, for example?
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by randman, posted 02-20-2006 12:23 AM randman has not replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5195 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 43 of 55 (288790)
02-20-2006 4:57 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by randman
02-20-2006 10:47 AM


Re: Close Reading
randman,
It is interesting though how something as clear and factual as this can be dismissed by many evos.
Oh, for crying out loud! So "clear & factual" that I have to ask the same question three times?
For the THIRD time:
"What about the schizochroal eye exceeds the needs of the trilobites? What about the schizochroal eye evolution is harder to explain than mammalian eye evolution, for example?"
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by randman, posted 02-20-2006 10:47 AM randman has not replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5195 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 49 of 55 (290123)
02-24-2006 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by randman
02-20-2006 3:47 PM


Re: Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going
randman,
Mark writes:
What about the schizochroal eye exceeds the needs of the trilobites? What about the schizochroal eye evolution is harder to explain than mammalian eye evolution, for example?
Your failure to answer these questions reduces your argument to another argument from personal incredulity. No facts presented, no evidence presented, demonstrates that you aren't even sure what you are being incredulous about.
Mark
This message has been edited by mark24, 02-24-2006 02:31 PM

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by randman, posted 02-20-2006 3:47 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by randman, posted 02-24-2006 2:48 PM mark24 has replied

  
mark24
Member (Idle past 5195 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 52 of 55 (290148)
02-24-2006 3:28 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by randman
02-24-2006 2:48 PM


Re: Back in the bigging, we had what looked to be a good topic going
randman,
Why? What knowledge, basis, etc,...do you have for your beliefs on this?
I readily admitted in the OP that I don't know much about trilobites. Apparently, you don't either, but choose to throw stones at me.
Firstly, there is a book on my bookshelf devoted to trilobites & deals with schizochroal eyes in depth, secondly, I haven't stated my "beliefs", so don't need to support anything. Why do you say "apparently" I don't know about trilobites either when I haven't attempted to educate you?
You, however, have stated that you are "inclined to agree" with the author. Why? You can't tell me why schizochroal eyes are harder than mammalian eyes to explain, you can't even tell me what is surplus to requirements. You are agreeing because you want to massage your preconceptions, sans evidence. You will believe what you want, regardless of lack of support. That's the point.
Mark

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by randman, posted 02-24-2006 2:48 PM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024