Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Death before the 'Fall'?
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 172 of 230 (286668)
02-14-2006 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by AdminPD
02-14-2006 6:46 PM


Re: Off Topic Alert
Admin,
I think there was death before the fall of Adam and Eve were created.
I think death entered the world of Adam and Eve through Adam's sin as Romans says.
In pre-Adamic times I believe there was sin and death pertaining to the creatures, whatever they were, who were under the government of Satan.
That's the topic. That's my contribution tonight to the topic.
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-14-2006 07:41 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by AdminPD, posted 02-14-2006 6:46 PM AdminPD has not replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 173 of 230 (286688)
02-14-2006 11:08 PM


Admin,
Is it the case that whenever I come close to the subjective experiences of Christ that is "Off Topic?"
Is it the case that what is desired here is "What Does the Bible Really Means" only in an objective way that has nothing to do with God subjectively? It seems that it is a given that "What the Bible Really Means" is only in an objective sense keeping God at arms length as far as subjective experience is concerned.
Suppose I said that one can never really know what the Bible Really Means apart from a subjective experience of God?
I ask this because I see quite a few divergences from the topic commited by others that seem to go uncensored. But whenever I approach subjective experiences as an aid to understand the Bible, these are quickly flagged as "Off Topic."

Replies to this message:
 Message 174 by AdminNosy, posted 02-14-2006 11:19 PM jaywill has not replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 185 of 230 (286794)
02-15-2006 7:25 AM


More than one man and woman is involved
RrHain,
If Adam had expired completely before sunset then there would be no human race for God to save. That would mean that the enemy of God thwarted God's plan.
It was more than a personal matter concerning one man and one woman. It was a matter of God putting into place a plan of salvation for man as a whole. Where is man if Adam and Eve had no children but died before sunset?
Do you think that suddenly an all knowing God decided to altar events and allow Adam to live out 900 years? I don't think that this was God's sudden remedial solution. I think from the beginning He knew what He would have to do. So if that is the case why would he promise Adam that he would only have until sunset before he collapsed?
"Cursed is the ground because of you; In toil ..."
What toil? If Adam only has until sunset before his last breath, what is this talk about toil or the need for it? Do you think God suddenly decided to let Adam toil for awhile? I don't.
"Cursed is the ground because of you; In toil you will eat of it all the days of your life."
Do you think that God suddenly decided on the fly to add days to Adam's doomed life? I don't. I think God had an eternal purpose to rescue and fulfill. I think God knew and thought out the possibilities before the universe was created. I don't think He suddenly decided that He would BREAK His word and let Adam live out more days than just one.
"And thorns and thistles it will bring forth for you, And you will ear the herb of the field; By the sweat of your face you will eat bread UNTIL ... you return to the ground,
Because from it you were taken; For dust you are, And to dust you shall return."
I don't think any of these pronouncements were an altaration or re-thinking of a promise to kill Adam by sunset.
In the next verse, verse 20, Adam names his wife "The mother of all living". God has more than a plan with just two individuals whom He must make certain die before sunset. It is shortsighted to miss that people have to be born in order for God to enact a salvation to mankind as a whole.
It is really to trivialize the Creator of the world and man to suggest that His only desire was to make sure that Adam and Eve croaked before sundown. How shortsighted this is.
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 07:27 AM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 07:28 AM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 07:33 AM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 07:35 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by Chiroptera, posted 02-15-2006 12:19 PM jaywill has replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 187 of 230 (286800)
02-15-2006 7:46 AM
Reply to: Message 186 by purpledawn
02-15-2006 7:30 AM


Re: Parent's Perrogative
Sure there is, he didn't follow through. If he followed through he would have meant it, but since he didn't, he obviously didn't mean it.
His later decisions are just that, later decisions.
I think I will dub this the "Oops Theory."
That is a theory that God was shocked and surprised that Adam actually did eat of the forbidden fruit. By Golly He never thought that he would do it. Ooops. God has to now break his promise to kill off Adam before the sun goes down.
God says "Ooops. I shouldn't have said that Adam is going to die today. Hmmm. Now how do I get out of this one?"
C'mon guys. Can you conceive a Being Whose knowledge and wisdom is infinite? Look at the universe. Where is its end? How big is it? Look at the atoms and the particles inside of it. Is there an end in sight? Have we found the largest structure in the universe? Have we yet discovered the smallest particle, the Omega Minus of quantom science?
I think the Creator [was] wise enough to know exactly what to do well in advance concerning when Adam should breath his last.
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 07:48 AM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 07:50 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by purpledawn, posted 02-15-2006 7:30 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 188 by nwr, posted 02-15-2006 12:11 PM jaywill has replied
 Message 189 by Chiroptera, posted 02-15-2006 12:15 PM jaywill has not replied
 Message 198 by purpledawn, posted 02-15-2006 6:47 PM jaywill has replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 191 of 230 (286917)
02-15-2006 12:59 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by nwr
02-15-2006 12:11 PM


Re: Parent's Perrogative
What about the flood story, where God apparently says "Oops! I shouldn't have done that. I will invent the rainbow as a sign that I will never do it again."
Alright. I anticipated some objection like this. You have a point.
My response is that what we hear of God saying concerning His repentence is mainly for OUR knowlege. It is so that we can see God's heart concerning man's sin and God's salvation.
The book of Revelation says that the Lamb of God, the Redeeming Savior, was slain "from the foundation of the world" (Rev. 13:8) This must mean that from the foundation of the world God knew that Christ would be the slain and resurrected Redeemer Savior.
"And all those dwelling on the earth will worship him [the Antichrist] every one whose name is not written in the book of life of the Lamb who was slain from the foundation of the world"
How could there be a panicky afterthought on God's part if He knew from the very foundation of the world that the Lamb of God, Christ, would have to be the atoning sacrifice for our sins?
So God's utternance about the rainbow, and the repentence, and the associated promises not to bring another flood, are recorded words that WE may see the heart of God. I don't think that they represent a sudden remedial shift on the Divine part totally ignorant of the possibilities from the foundation of the world.
No OOOPs. Just a little window into the eternal heart of God concerning our redemption and salvation.
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 12:59 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 01:01 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 01:02 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by nwr, posted 02-15-2006 12:11 PM nwr has not replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 192 of 230 (286922)
02-15-2006 1:08 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by Chiroptera
02-15-2006 12:19 PM


Re: Wait a minute!
Unless God's plan was for billions of people to burn in Hell for all eternity, the enemy has succeeded in thwarting God's plan.
I read that the eternal fire was prepared for the Devil and his angels:
"Then He will say also to those on the left, Go away from Me, you who are cursed into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels" (Matt. 25:41)
I think that the idea is that you go where your leader goes. If Christ is your leader you share His glorious destiny. If you refuse Christ as your Leader you go down with your leader the Devil.
But we shouldn't think about it too much. At least Calvin suggested that we should not think about it too much. We should think instead about the salvation extended to man in Christ.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by Chiroptera, posted 02-15-2006 12:19 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by Chiroptera, posted 02-15-2006 1:19 PM jaywill has replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 194 of 230 (286947)
02-15-2006 1:47 PM
Reply to: Message 193 by Chiroptera
02-15-2006 1:19 PM


Re: Wait a minute!
Did God have a plan prior to creation? Are things going according to that plan? If not, then his plans have been thwarted. You seem to be saying that the eternal torment of humanity was a part of God's plan from the beginning.
I believe that God had an eternal purpose before creation.
I believe that God cannot be stopped from fulfilling His purpose. He can be caused some trouble. He can be delayed. But He cannot be stopped.
Was the damnation and torment of humanity a part of God's plan? I don't know. I would like to think that it was not. But I am prepared to discard that if one day I realize that there is no other way than to believe that it was.
But we shouldn't think about it too much.
I do believe that this is the standard defense of mass murderers and despots when they are tried for crimes against humanity.
Okay.
Then you should not be bothered if I ask you this:
Let us place Jesus Christ of the Bible on a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being the most immoral and 10 being the most moral. Where would you put yourself in relation to Jesus?
Do you view yourself on par with Christ? Would you place yourself somewhat beneath Him on the scale? Or would you place yourself above Him?
On a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the most right, the most good, the most just ... where would you put yourself and where would you put Jesus Christ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by Chiroptera, posted 02-15-2006 1:19 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 196 by Garrett, posted 02-15-2006 4:05 PM jaywill has not replied
 Message 197 by Chiroptera, posted 02-15-2006 6:13 PM jaywill has replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 199 of 230 (287122)
02-15-2006 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 195 by Garrett
02-15-2006 4:04 PM


Re: Evidence that there was no death before the Fall
Duh...of course I meant Cain.
Hey, I make plenty of typos.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by Garrett, posted 02-15-2006 4:04 PM Garrett has not replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 200 of 230 (287123)
02-15-2006 8:11 PM
Reply to: Message 198 by purpledawn
02-15-2006 6:47 PM


Re: What Promise
Is every statement a promise?
I see no promise in the text.
I was arguing against the concept of Rrhain that God's "promise," so to speak, was that Adam would collapse in death before sunset.
I was using irony to argue against that concept, not for.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by purpledawn, posted 02-15-2006 6:47 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 201 of 230 (287130)
02-15-2006 8:37 PM
Reply to: Message 197 by Chiroptera
02-15-2006 6:13 PM


Re: Wait a minute!
What is it about Christian literalists that they cannot stick to the point? This has absolutely nothing to do with the point at hand.
I said "Okay" meaning that it was noted that you drew a parellel between ny saying that we shouldn't think about the terrible perdition and the attitude of your mass murderers. No change of point.
So you want to answer my question about your relative moral position on a scale of 1 to 10 as compared to Christ's? Your point is made. Now let me examine your sense of judgment a bit further. Why evade the question?
In a previous post you stated:
If Adam had expired completely before sunset then there would be no human race for God to save. That would mean that the enemy of God thwarted God's plan.
You imply that God would not allow anyone or anything to thwart his plans. Since (according to your beliefs) the majority of the human race is going to burn in Hell for ever,
Can you point out where I gave percentages one way or another?
And would you consider answering my question about the moral scale with you and Christ on it?
this implies that you believe that this must have been a part of God's plan.
I believe that "in Christ" is the realm and sphere of God's plan. So we should ask God to place us "in Christ."
"Even as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world to be holy and without blemish before Him in love predestinating us unto sonship through Jesus Christ" (Epd. 1:4,5)
God seems willing at any time to place us "in Christ" if we ask Him to do that.
I was trying to get you to clarify whether you really feel this is the case (admittedly, my use of witticism didn't make this too clear).
You didn't clarify your point; instead, your response had nothing to do with it at all. And in your post make the statement:
I don't want to get you confused with another poster. It is awkward to go back and forth to check, once I have started typing.
But I think I answered someone quite clearly that I did not know if millions of people damned was a part of God's plan. I think I answered quite clearly that I hoped that it was not and that I would be prepared to adopt such a belief that it was, if convinced of its inevitability. So I think there was no evasion to this question.
Was that your question?
But we shouldn't think about it too much. At least Calvin suggested that we should not think about it too much.
Which sounds an awful lot like you found the question uncomfortable and didn't want it discussed.
There is no shame in someone feeling uncomfortable to discuss something. The spiritual family has different levels of maturity and growth. I don't insist that a young person HAS to discuss something very heavy if they feel that they are yet not able to do so.
There is no law that the instant one becomes a Chirstian she or he MUST be comfortable to be conversant in ALL aspects of the gospel.
My saying that one should not think about it was qualified with "too much." I didn't say that one should altogether evade the matter.
Eternal perdition is a fact. It is a tragic fact. Those who will not believe in Christ seem trapped in an inescapable labyrinth, a maze of dead ends of their own reasoning. The best thing to do is to receive the gift of salvation and believe in Christ.
Do you wish me to talk about nothing but people burning in hell? Is that what you want? There is an awful lot in the Bible besides that matter.
Was the damnation and torment of humanity a part of God's plan? I don't know. I would like to think that it was not. But I am prepared to discard that if one day I realize that there is no other way than to believe that it was.
This statement at least does address the point about which I was asking. So in the end you have answered the question that I asked.
Thanks.
Maybe you want to recipicate now. You posed a very tough philosophical problem. Give me a chance to deal with it.
On the scale of 1 to 10 where are you and where is Jesus, as to goodness, justness, righteousness, equity? You're smart. Play along and see what comes out.
I think you'll have a decent push back if you disagree with where I'm going.
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 08:38 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 08:41 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 08:42 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 08:47 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-15-2006 08:47 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by Chiroptera, posted 02-15-2006 6:13 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 202 by Chiroptera, posted 02-16-2006 12:07 AM jaywill has replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 212 of 230 (288103)
02-18-2006 1:34 PM
Reply to: Message 202 by Chiroptera
02-16-2006 12:07 AM


Re: Wait a minute!
Chiroptrea,
I'd give myself 8.5. Jesus maybe about the same.
Sorry for the delay.
Do you have any thoughts on why the impact of Jesus Christ on human history has been so much more than your impact?
If you are about the same on the scale doesn't His impact on history seem to be more noticable than yours?
But that is not my main question. I ask that because I was a little surprised that you would class yourself as virtually equal to Jesus Christ.
My main question is if you and Jesus are about an 8.5 on the scale how do you think you and Jesus might graduate up another degree to, let us say, 9.5?
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-18-2006 01:35 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by Chiroptera, posted 02-16-2006 12:07 AM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 214 by Chiroptera, posted 02-18-2006 1:51 PM jaywill has replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 215 of 230 (288148)
02-18-2006 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 214 by Chiroptera
02-18-2006 1:51 PM


Re: Wait a minute!
Is this another question? Because it doesn't seem to be related to the question of how Jesus' "righteousness" compares to mine.
Just a little reality check. Forget it then.
You would rate yourself and Jesus Christ in roughly the same class. I'll accept that answer.
That would be hard to say since, as I told Brian, the only record we have of Jesus' life are the Christian Gospels, and they don't really record how Jesus conducted his life on a day-to-day business. They really only concern themselves with his teachings, and those only occupied the last couple of years of his life. I thought I was being rather generous in giving him an 8.5.
I think it is hard to say. But not for the reason you state. There is plenty in the gospels telling us how Christ conducted His business. Doing His Father's will was His business.
Particularly in Mark's gospel, the world "immediately" used so many times portrays a picture of what Jesus did virtually by a moment by moment manner ... "immediatly" He did this or "immediately" He did that.
As much as is plausible for four gospels to display the major daily activities of someone's life for thirty three and a half years they did a pretty good job of discribing His daily business. It includes His meals, His rest, His meetings, His teachings, His miracle, His reactions where you really find out where a person is, His discussions.
Aside from these things we have examples of His prayers. We have examples of Him avoiding crowds. We have examples of Him moving into the midst of crouds. We see Him tired. And we see Him working late into the day. We see Him sleeping. We see Him eating and partying at a feast. We see Him in temptation. We see Him angry. We see Him weeping. We see Him just shedding a tear.
So I quite emphatically disagree that the typical daily life of Jesus is not discribed in the four gospels. We may not have many details of His childhood. But His ministry as a priest according to the law of Moses should begin at the age of 30. And that is the important part for us to know.
Of course we see Him heal the sick and raise the dead. We see Him arguing with His opposers, rebuking His disciples, commending or scolding His seekers, and encouraging those interested in His work. We see His parables which describe His life's philosophy. And we see His behavior under scrutinization of lawyers and His demeanor under torture.
Last of all we see His composure, demeanor, and attitude after His resurrection. We even get a glimps of His attitude after His ascension - standing rather than sitting when the first Christian martyr was killed.
We see enough of the daily life of Jesus to either love Him or hate Him. We see enough to have a strong reaction about Him one way or another. There is no such scanty details as you suggest about the daily life of Jesus. We see Him singing a hymn. We even hear Him at least talking about eliminating waste from the body.
We have four biographies in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. There is plenty there to muse over about what kind of man Jesus was. And for 2,000 some years plus many have written volumes upon volumes on that life.
So I don't think lack of written details about Christ's day to day business is an obstacle to you suggesting how He could move from a 8.5 to an 9.5. If the gospels don't describe the day to day business of Christ what do they describe?
No problem; we are all busy. I just didn't see the point to the question, so I was a bit annoyed when you asked me to answer it several times and then I had to wait before you got to your point.
Come to think of it, I'm still waiting for the point.
I think the true reason for your difficulty to describe how He or you could move from 8.5 to 9.5 is that that your level is 8.5. It is as 8.5 that you think. It is at that level that you have your concept and your understanding.
I think that it is difficult for you to suggest how you could improve because your level is your level. And it is primarily at that level of goodness you reason and your concept stands. Perhaps once your yourself grow on to be at 9.5 then you can tell how Jesus can come up to your new level.
Now my point behind this, since I have worn your 8.5 "Christ like" patience thin (smile), is that if someone were substantially above and beyond our present level on the scale it is conceivable that they may act in ways that we would not understand.
They may do things which were outside of our concept. Just as some things done by an adult are beyond the conception of a child or even an adolescent. A man of 25 may not grasp the actions of a man at 65 in the fullest measure. That is because he is at 25 and reasons on that level.
I consider that some things Christ may do I would not understand because His level of righteousness is far beyond my own level. The possibility at least does exist that I don't fathom the equity and the justness of His action.
These are some of the things that I think about when someone insinuates that the Lord Jesus behaves like a mass murderer with no conscience. I leave room for the fact that along with all the merciful things that I ALSO see coming from Christ, perhaps there is a concept of justice that is simply beyond my level of understanding.
What prompted this question to you and my discussion of it was your suggestion that I exhibited the attitude of a mass murderer. I think that is something I have to think about. My response is to obey the commission of my Master to preach the gospel to all nations that they may be saved.
My reaction is not to be so crippled with the thought of damnation that I refuse to preach the gospel but only marvel that God could be so cruel. At least I have His word that He "desires all men to come be saved and to come to the full knowledge of the truth "(1 Tim. 4:2).
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-18-2006 04:12 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-18-2006 04:14 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-18-2006 04:17 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-18-2006 04:19 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by Chiroptera, posted 02-18-2006 1:51 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by Chiroptera, posted 02-18-2006 7:19 PM jaywill has not replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 218 of 230 (288803)
02-20-2006 5:23 PM
Reply to: Message 217 by AdminPD
02-18-2006 8:06 PM


Death of Pre-Adamic Creatures who became Demons
Now I will turn to evidence of sin and death in a world prior to the Adam’s world under his dominion. Revelation 20 speaks of the final judgment of all rebellious creatures at the great white throne:
"And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne . " (Rev. 20:12a). There no doubt to me that dead human beings are indicated here. But what about the next verse?
"And the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead which were in them; and they were judged, each of them, according to their works" (Rev. 20:13).
All human beings who die go to Hades. All human beings from Adam throughout all human history die to be held by death and Hades. Why then does the Apostle John say that " . the sea gave up the dead which were in it, . ?" There should be no reason for John to differenciate between the dead humans in Hades and the dead humans who have drowned in the sea. Men who die on the land have their souls go to Hades. Men who die at sea ALSO have their souls go to Hades. But John says that in addition to those in death and Hades, the sea also gave up the dead which were in it.
I say that "the dead" held in the sea probably refers to the demons. Now we must look at the biblical evidence supporting this claim. But my explanations will be concise and not exhaustive. The forum requires brevity.
First some may object that the demons are bad angels and that nowhere are we told that bad angels die. My response is that the demons are not the same as bad angels.
In Acts 23 the Pharisees recognized that there were spirits and there were angels, two class of spiritual beings - "and some of the scribes of the Pharisees’s party rose up and contended, saying, We find nothing evil in this man. And what if a spirit has spoken to him, or an angel?" (Acts 23:9). The Saducees countered them incorrectly not believing in either angels or spirits - "For the Saducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel nor spirit; but the Pharisees confess both" (23:8).
These verses are submitted not to prove that the Pharisees were that clear about the nature of demons but only to demonstrate that they recognized other spiritual beings besides angels.
Secondly, there is evidence that the demons are non angelic spirits who are supposed to be confined to the sea:
Jesus teaches "When the unclean spirit goes out from the man, it roams through waterless places; seeking rest, and does not find it" (Matt.12:43). This verse proves that in this present age the demons prefer these three states of existence in this order:
To inhabit a human being’s body.
To roam about in search of a human body.
To dwell in the sea as a watered place.
They are supposed to be in a watery place, i.e. the sea. They leave that realm and demon possess a sinner’s human body. When they are expelled from there they wander about in "waterless places" seeking rest. The Lord continues with demonic behavior:
"Then it says, I will return to my house from which I came out. And it comes and finds it unoccupied, swept, and decorated. Then it goes and takes along with itself seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter in and settle down there. And the last state of that man becomes worse thay the first.Thus shall it be also with this eevil generation." (Matt.12:44,45)
The wandering demon finds no new subject. Instead of returning to the watery place it returns to the previous man. This time to secure a greater hold over the man the demon brings the reinforcement of seven other demons more evil than itself. This assures the demonic spirits that it will be more difficult to be cast out of the man whose body they are treating as a house.
Why are the demons so desparate to hold on to the human body? It is because they have lost their own physical bodies. This probably happened in the pre-Adamic age. These evil beings were not humans. And we don’t know what they were. But it is apparent that they are "the dead" given up by the big watery place, the sea, to be judged with humans at the great white throne.
Now how else can we know that these demon spirits are supposed to be in the sea? It is evident from Matthew 8 that they rushed down into the sea when Jesus cast them out of a man, allowing them to possess the bodies of hogs:
"And when He came to the other side, into the region of the Gadarenes, two possessed by demons met Him, as they were coming out of the tombs, so exceedingly fierce that no one was able to pass by on that road.
And behold, they (the demons) cried out, saying, What do we have to do with You, Son of God? Have you come here before the time to torment us? Now there was, a good way off from them, a herd of many hogs feeding. And the demons entreateed Him, saying, If You cast is out, send us into the herd of hogs. And He said to them, Go! Abd they came out and went into the hogs. And behold, the whole herd rushed down the steep slope into the sea, and they died in the waters" (Matt. 8:28-32)
Now we have to add to our list of places that the demons prefer to live in order of best to worse:
The prefer to have their own physical bodies. But they have lost them. Hence they are the dead evil spirits. If they cannot have their original bodies they prefer a human body. And to secure one they will gather more demons, even a legion, to hold on strongly that they may not be cast out. If a servant of God or the Son of God casts them out of a human body they would prefer to enter into an animals body. They entreated the Lord Jesus to send them into the herd of hogs. The hogs not being able to tolerate the demon possession for some reason are forced to kill themselves in the water. The demons return to the sea, the watery place from which they were wandering. Last of all is the worst of all. They await in the sea, the watery place, for the judgment in which they will be tormented. The eternal perdition is the worst state for them.
The demons are supposed to be in the sea awaiting the terrible doom of their eternal torment. They know that "the time" will come. They roam around in a suffering state of disembodiment seeking sinful humans that they may demon possess their bodies. But in Revelation 20 the dead who are not in Hades but in the sea are given up at that time to be judged and tormented for their evil works in pre-Adamic times and in post-Adamic times.
There is one more verse that I would refer to to prove that the demons are the disembodied spirits of some creatures assigned to the sea. That is Revelation 16:13:
"And I saw, out of the mouth of the dragon and out of the mouth of the beast and out of the mouth of the false prophet, three unclean spirits as frogs;
For they are the spirits of demons doing signs, which go forth to the kings of the whole inhabited earth to gather them to the war of the great day of God the Almighty."
In John’s vision he saw the demons as frogs. This is meaningful. A frog is an amphibian animal which lives in the water but hops up onto the dry land occasionally to move around. This symbolism indicates that the demons are assigned to the sea, to the watery place as their confined area of judgment after God destroyed the pre-Adamic world. But somehow, in rebellion, they come up out of the sea and wander about on the land like the amphibian frog.
After the judgment of the great white throne, the sea as the prison for demons will be replaced by the second death, the lake of fire. Since the holding place for the pre-Adamic dead is no longer needed there will be no more need for the sea in the new heaven and new earth:
"And I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth passed away, and the sea is no more" (Rev. 21:1).
In eternity future when all the evil angels, unbelievers, and demons have been judged two things will no longer be needed. That is death and Hades as the receptical for dead humans and the sea as the recepticle for the pre-Adamic dead beings who followed Satan. Revelation 21:1 tells us that the sea is no more by then. And Revelation 20:13 tells us that death and Hades are likewise discarded:
"And the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead which were in them; and they were judged, each of them, according to their works.
And death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire."
These verses have been presented to prove that sin and death existed in the pre-Adamic world before Adam was created and failed God. Then sin and death entered into the world which was put under Adam’s dominion through Satan's seduction and usurpation.
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-20-2006 05:25 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-20-2006 05:29 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-20-2006 11:14 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-20-2006 11:23 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by AdminPD, posted 02-18-2006 8:06 PM AdminPD has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 219 by randman, posted 02-20-2006 5:59 PM jaywill has replied
 Message 229 by Nighttrain, posted 07-28-2006 4:16 AM jaywill has not replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 220 of 230 (288943)
02-20-2006 11:46 PM
Reply to: Message 219 by randman
02-20-2006 5:59 PM


Re: Death of Pre-Adamic Creatures who became Demons
I don't know about the sea holding the demons. I think maybe it's because I love the ocean so much, but also it's not the strongest argument.
There may be a hint of it in the natural world which God created for our eyes to see. Have you ever noticed how in the deeper depths of the ocean the fish begin to look more and more grotesque?
The sea is spoken positively about in Scripture. So I don't think that one has to disdain the sea for these reasons. Nor need we disdain the upper atmosphere just because Satan is called "the ruler of the authority of the air" (Eph.2:2). The rebellious angels are also associated with the heavenlies - "world-rulers of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenlies" (Eph. 6:12).
I think we can still admire the physical beauty of the sea, the air, and the heavenlies in spite of these things. However, Revelation does say that in the new heaven and new earth the sea will be no more.
But there is something there....
On the general idea, I like the way you refer to "the world" as the world under Adam. That may be correct. After all, we do have translators referring to replenishing the earth. I also think your scenario is more admirable due to not calling the hypothetical race of beings "men." That's always been a beef with me; referring to preAdamic men when Adam is the first man in the scriptures.
I think that the previous economy in the universe before Adam may have been totally unlike anything we could imagine. I don't understand many things about this. But my feeling today is that there was a pre-Adamic world in which the lines of authority and government over those creatures was something much different from today.
Whatever it was it was totally destroyed by God and replaced with a new order. Perhaps we are looking out at the earth and the solar system and seeing today the ruined remnants kingdom in a by-gone ancient era.
Gotta think about this "sea" thing....note btw that the sea is also used as a reference to the world.
That is true.
This message has been edited by jaywill, 02-20-2006 11:47 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 219 by randman, posted 02-20-2006 5:59 PM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024