Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Irreducible Complexity

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Irreducible Complexity
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4136 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 33 of 59 (291675)
03-03-2006 3:09 AM 		Reply to: Message 30 by inkorrekt
03-02-2006 8:43 PM

Re: Irreducible complexity
Ok then explain what complexity is, much less how we detect IC, much less decide which is not IC and which is
​
Finally, prove to us that irreducible complexity does not exist.
prove it does exist, other than inferrence and cop-out
This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by inkorrekt, posted 03-02-2006 8:43 PM inkorrekt has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by inkorrekt, posted 03-04-2006 6:23 PM ReverendDG has replied
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4136 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 38 of 59 (292268)
03-05-2006 12:07 AM 		Reply to: Message 36 by inkorrekt
03-04-2006 6:23 PM

Re: Irreducible complexity
i'm trying to get something to go on other than IC exists!
you have yet to show how to detect IC
you said you want people to prove that IC doesn't exist, i'm not the one making faulty reasoning
​
I guess the idea of the quotes around reverend is sarcasm?, some how i just don't feel the cleverness
​
This message has been edited by ReverendDG, 03-05-2006 12:09 AM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by inkorrekt, posted 03-04-2006 6:23 PM inkorrekt has not replied
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4136 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 41 of 59 (292561)
03-05-2006 11:28 PM 		Reply to: Message 39 by inkorrekt
03-05-2006 5:41 PM

Re: heh
But, to criticize a well recognized Scientist like Dr. Behe, one must have even a part of his credentials and must be in a better position intelluctually and academically.
since the other crap is purely OT and nonsense, i'll answer this part, all of the things behe claims show ID is purely unsupported by evidence, and its not about the PHD but about whether what the guy says can be backed up by evidence
This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by inkorrekt, posted 03-05-2006 5:41 PM inkorrekt has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024