A History of god

Mr. Reverend DG,It is not fascinating if someone has written a book on the history of God because it's so easy to let one's mind works.Here in the Philippines we have few old books that luckily survived from the intellectual colonization and Christianization of the Spaniards which bear some factual informations on the history of God. These books were made from dear skins and written in Latin language and believed to be parts of the "unsolicited fractions" of the Dead Sea Scroll." I have already seen some of it but I can not understand the writings. However, most of it were already translated/interpreted but never been published because of its sacredness. I slightly mentioned this topic in my journal (ranie070 LiveJournal), and I suggest you read it to satiate your query.Not all present day books on spiritual topics are divinely inspired but written as mere products of man's imaginations, and for money, too.

I am becoming more interested to participate in this kind of forum. However, I just don't know how will I limit my words because I might violate the "oath" I have had in keeping the secrets I knew.In this topic alone, I am almost about to reveal the "names" used by the "Almighty God" from the time He was dealing with His first creations, until our present day generations; names that will prove that God has a written story as proof of His immeasurable power and glory; a written history to be revealed in the near future. But I supposed I have no authority to do it. Nevertheless I can slightly cite topics known to many that have relations to it. For example, God is called Jehovah (JHVH) or Yahweh (YHWH) by the Jews; the early Egyptians called him Sun God RA; some names in the Bible were also mentioned, like Jehovah-Jireh, El Shaddai, Shalom, etc.Many people are probably aware that a certain "anagram" is being circulated through the net bearing these letters "S A T O R A R E P O T E N E T O P E R A R O T A S." May I educate those people that these words must not be taken for granted. These 25 letters are actually called the "25 LLAVES" and taken as acronyms to represent the "first 25 letters" of a prayer known to be one of the prayers of the 12 Apostles. In this prayer, the "name" of God is mentioned.It is also written in Revelation 2:17 that a new name (God's name) will be given to those who will overcome.

Thank you for your comment and for qouting the site as your reference: 厨房里抱着岳丰满大屁股,岳的又肥又大水多啊喷了,男朋友太粗做完下面疼,欧洲一卡2卡三卡4卡乱码毛1. I would like to emphasize that one of the contributors in the site (ranie) is me, and am so thankful for you.

This is my comment to your reply: "its not gods name but the name of the person that believes and eats of the manna, where do you get its gods name? (Revelation 2:17 He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who overcomes, I will give the hidden manna. I will also give him a white stone inscribed with a new name, known only to the one who receives it.).My friend, do you have your name? Of course, you have. Do you mean you have another name(s) aside from what your name is? Probably you have an alias? And, of course no matter how long or how hard to pronounce your name is, still you have a name and you surely knew it. But, do you knew exactly the name of your god is? Of course, you will say "yes." And, do you mean your god's name is "Jehovah" or "Yahweh" or "Jesus Christ?" Of course you may say all these are the names of your god. But, do you knew already "His Name" by the time He will return and judge both the living and the dead?The "Parable of the Ten Virgins" says that He will come like a theft in the night. It means no one has no knowledge about Him, no one know what He looks like, and no one don't even know his name will be. Just like when Lord Jesus Christ came, they knew He is coming but no one has no idea how He will come.The logic is very simple, if your Master will give you a secret, will it be about "His secret" or "your secret?" Tell me.

qoute:
________________________________________________________________________
its difficult to believe this because things that are unpublished, may or may not be real. i would love to read it if it exists and it gets published
_________________________________________________________________Some Apostles testified that there are other things the Lord Jesus had made to prove that He is the Son of God, that if these things are to be written, the world itself is not enough to contain it. THerefore, lucky are those who knew it.This message has been edited by AdminJar, 03-10-2006 09:16 AM

qoute:
___________________________________________________________________
its difficult to believe this because things that are unpublished, may or may not be real. i would love to read it if it exists and it gets published
___________________________________________________________________Some Apostles testified that there are other things the Lord Jesus had made to prove that He is the Son of God, that if these things are to be written, the world itself is not enough to contain it. Therefore, lucky are those who knew it.By the way, which event came first, the writings of the Old Testament books by the Apostles or the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls? Is the Dead Sea Scrolls complete?
Edited this message and the preceeding one to shorten the lines to preseve page width.

​

In the future, you can use either html or dB codes to quote sections.This message has been edited by AdminJar, 03-10-2006 09:19 AM

Now I know whom shall I suppose to exchange ideas with.By the way, please read the Gospel of John 21:25 and it might help you understand what I have said.

I stand to be corrected. What I mean is which event came first, the writings of the "New Testament" by the "Apostles" or the discovery of the "Dead Sea Scroll?" Is the Dead Sea Scroll complete with what it supposed to contain?It very logical that even the present day Bible does not completely contain what it supposed to contain. Thus, our understanding on the history of God as partially mentioned in the Old and New Testament is very limited.

RSS? Do you mean Red Sea Scroll? It must be DSS (Dead Sea Acroll). And, it is not exactly "800" documents but "around 800" which means more or less. Sorry but you seems to be misleading.You got my point! The "DSS" is one of the most reliable references the church has on pre-Christian eras' religious records. But I supposed, although it is voluminous still it doesn't contain all the other scrolls that must written for the same purposes.I checked your link but sorry it is more on church (Catholicism) issues and I personally reject some of its views. Besides, it is not the sole authority/reference we must subscribe with. This message has been edited by AdminJar, 03-11-2006 07:18 AM

A reply is simple a reaction to the previous statement.