|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Do feelings count? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
This topic has occurred to me as a result of a recent discussion about aesthetics and earlier discussions about morality. My own view is that we can make no case for any given moral system being objective. One always begs the question when trying to devise an argument in which one argues that a particular moral rule is objective. The same situation occurs in aesthetics.
However, one's feelings about such matters are often quite different--or at least my feelings are. I FEEL that moral judgements, or certain moral judgements, are quite real--not subjective at all. And even in aesthetic matters, I FEEL (though less strongly) that certain aesthetic judgements are quite real. The question is whether these strong feelings we have matter--i.e., whether they are an indication that, though we cannot build a case, that perhaps some moral judgements and some aesthetic judgements are after all objective.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
coffee house.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
From a Christian point of view there is an objective morality, God's moral law, That's all very well, Faith, but there's no way to ground morality logically. However, emotionally, I probably feel as you do on most issues.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Excellent posts from both Faith and Holmes.
But my feelings are so strong about certain matters--for example, my ire when witnessing deliberate cruelty--that it makes me think that there is something intrinsic to the act of cruelty itself that I am recognizing objectively. Anyone else feel this way? This message has been edited by robinrohan, 03-05-2006 10:30 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
there is at least a rough moral consistency across the human race I agree with that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Thankfully most people do find most forms of cruelty odious That "thankfully" suggests some kind of objective standard.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
I'm not sure I understand your question, if there is one. If one has a very intense moral feeling, such as an abhorrence of cruelty, is this an indication that cruelty is evil?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
But the tree is external and others can feel as well, while the moral feelings are internal and not accessible by others. One might argue that most people have some similar feelings--such as ire when witnessing cruelty--which would suggest that their feelings are responding to something objective. A few who do not have such feelings might be explained as morally coarse. That wouldn't hurt the argument.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Aren't you assuming that "evil" exists I was asking a question. If the answer is yes, then it would follow that there is such a thing as "evil." And I suppose this would be an objective evil as well.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Second, there have been some cultures where cruelty was not considered odious Perhaps an entire culture can be morally coarse. ("The banality of evil" as one writer put it).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Muslim communities across the world were morally outraged by the printing of the danish cartoons. Are they correct and westerners morally course? This example is too complicated. We need something more obvious. Perhaps we could call the culture of Stalinism or Nazism morally coarse. Cruelty becomes an habitual thing, "banal." It works down and infests an entire culture.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
It merely replaces one subjective set of principles (my own, say) with another subjective set, namely whatever God feels is morally right or wrong. Presumably what God thinks is right and wrong is what is really right and wrong. Admittedly, there are some logical problems here.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Your second claim was that some cultures could be coarse, would that not make the western cultures coarse for not realizing their action's immoral properties? You can't judge an entire culture by one incident. You have to examine a culture as a whole, and you can only do that if you look at history.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
One distinction we must make is between knowledge and moral judgement.
Every violent act is not cruel. If a bad person deserves ill-treatment, then such ill-treatment could not called cruel (a criminal is sent to prison, for example). If a man sincerely believes that another man is evil, and thinks he has proof of some dastardly deed committed by that man, then his ill-treatment of that man may not be cruelty but justice. If he is honestly mistaken, then his act is still not "cruel." Horrible perhaps, but not "cruelty" strictly speaking. This message has been edited by robinrohan, 03-08-2006 04:39 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Who is to say if a person is "bad"? Our strong feelings tell us.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024