Is the "answersingenesis" site reliable?

Answers in Genesis isn't reliable as an organization. I would, however, consider the submitted literature in the AIG archives such as Baumgardner & Vardiman et al. As long as I can confirm their research.------------------

"Are we to understand that you have done this?"
--I dunno, how often is it that a creationist paper is even my supporting resource?------------------

"Why do you say they are not re-liable? I have talked with Ken Ham on the phone both in public (on air) and in private. "
--I'm sure Ken Ham and the rest of the AIG gang are really nice fellows, but as I have often illustrated, they (as well as many other YECist org's) still can't get past their biased methodology to scientific inquiry(eg. the tenents of the ICR). But I do respect the works of individuals who happen to submit work to the AIG, after all, where else is it going to go?BTW - Its nice to exchange an idea or two with you Brad ------------------[This message has been edited by TrueCreation, 01-18-2003]