Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,393 Year: 3,650/9,624 Month: 521/974 Week: 134/276 Day: 8/23 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Kin Selection & Altruism
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.5


Message 26 of 136 (257961)
11-08-2005 8:09 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by RAZD
11-08-2005 6:38 PM


Re: anecdotal
RAZD writes:
We have the report a couple years back of a female chimp protecting and saving a human child that got into the display area until the keepers could get him out.
As I recall, that "chimp" was actually a gorilla. Here are some links:
CBS Chicago - Breaking News, First Alert Weather, Exclusive Investigations & Community Journalism
Binti Jua | MY HERO
Ark Animals Wildside: Binti the Gorilla
Gorilla Heaven - Gorilla information & Conservation
This cannot be explained by any gene sharing model, but it can be explained by a social group model.
The genetic (kinship) accounts of altruism have never seemed convincing to me. I doubt that this is a genetic trait, at least in humans and gorillas. IMO it is more likely learned behavior.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by RAZD, posted 11-08-2005 6:38 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by RAZD, posted 11-08-2005 9:25 PM nwr has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.5


Message 29 of 136 (258003)
11-08-2005 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by RAZD
11-08-2005 9:25 PM


Re: anecdotal
Fascinating. I remember it as chimp.
Living in the Chicago area, and having visited the ape house at Brookfield zoo a number of times, it stuck in my memory.
I doubt that this is a genetic trait, at least in humans and gorillas. IMO it is more likely learned behavior.
The problem I have here is the aspect of beneficial to the species while at a less than neutral benefit to the individual (zool. definition above), and the results of game theory that do show a benefit to the group that employs altruism.
My theory is that what is selected by evolution, is the ability to be easily socialized. The actual altruism would be a detail of the socialization.
In the case of binti the gorilla, her experiences might have included socializing with humans more than is typical for gorillas (even zoo gorillas)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by RAZD, posted 11-08-2005 9:25 PM RAZD has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Omnivorous, posted 11-08-2005 11:26 PM nwr has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.5


Message 125 of 136 (294583)
03-12-2006 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by RAZD
03-12-2006 3:31 PM


Re: life is a game
RAZD writes:

Toddlers Try to Help out Adults, Study Shows

How do you distinguish between altruism and enlightened self interest?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by RAZD, posted 03-12-2006 3:31 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by RAZD, posted 03-12-2006 7:02 PM nwr has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.5


Message 127 of 136 (294672)
03-12-2006 8:46 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by RAZD
03-12-2006 7:02 PM


Re: life is a game
Enlightened self interest serves a purpose for the person, there is a benefit. Or do you have a more enlightened application in mind?
I just mailed of the check for my insurance premium. Since I'm not expecting to benefit, I guess that make me an altruist.
We wouldn't agree with that, of course. I made a rational decision to purchase insurance, aware of the cost and the possible (or unlikely) benefits.
I'm suggesting that society itself is a kind of informal insurance pool for a social species. The good deeds we do are the premiums we pay, and the good deeds others do for us are the benefits we receive.
The idea is that altruistic behavior is learned. The young child gets a lot of benefits from this social insurance system, and quickly learns that paying his/her premiums makes him more respected in the society, and thus better able to collect benefits when needed. This isn't done in some sort of crass calculation. But the suggestion is that children already learn to recognize the extent to which they are respected by the system, and thus in some sense to judge the size of the potential insurance benefits, should they need them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by RAZD, posted 03-12-2006 7:02 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by RAZD, posted 03-13-2006 7:39 AM nwr has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.5


Message 129 of 136 (294822)
03-13-2006 8:30 AM
Reply to: Message 128 by RAZD
03-13-2006 7:39 AM


Re: life is a game
No, that's a gamble, that you will get more benefit than you pay for. Those that don't buy insurance gamble that they would get less than they would have paid for.
You are not buying insurance as a gamble, but as protection against ruin (sometimes called "gambler's ruin"). You typically know that it is a bad gamble, but still of value for its protection against ruin.
I guess that comment was off-topic.
At 18 months?
Obviously the insurance model I gave is a simplification. But sure, by 18 months the child has already learnt about social relations, at least within the family, and already knows the benefit of doing things that please his parents.
and how does this explain the chimps helping?
I'm not an expert in chimps. But they are a social species, albeit not nearly as social as humans.
Personally I believe it is a by-product of a social species behavior.
I agree. But that doesn't contradict it being learned behavior.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by RAZD, posted 03-13-2006 7:39 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by RAZD, posted 03-13-2006 9:13 PM nwr has replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.5


Message 131 of 136 (295246)
03-14-2006 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by RAZD
03-13-2006 9:13 PM


Re: life is a gamble
Ah, but the species must have the (evolved?) capacity to {learn\aquire\develop\grok} the behavior. Could a totally a-social species learn it?
I expect that the basic principles of learning are the same for all mammalian species, though some are better at it than others. But learning is driven by necessity. Humans need help from others, so are more motivated to join in the social game. Being born relatively immature, and lacking the fur of other apes, is likely part of what provides the dependence on others that is part of this need.
This is where I think altruism is just a by-product of general cooperative (social) behavior where everyone benefits from combined effort to the point where helpful behavior becomes 'natural' without need of benefit.
Agreed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by RAZD, posted 03-13-2006 9:13 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024