It's curious how much effort is spent by creationists attempting to explain Noah's Ark as scientifically feasible when the story is one of Divine Intervention.
If we make this, this, and this assumption -- if the Ark contained "kinds" instead of "species", if most animals hibernated and thus required no care, if migratory instinct brought them there, if the continental shelves and mountain chains were all squished down back then so the world's present water could cover all the land, etc. etc. --- why, it's possible!
It seems that in coming up with a secular explanation, they're shooting themselves in the foot. After all, if the story is feasible without resorting to the supernatural, then one need not invoke the supernatural to explain it.