Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   anti-abortion folks still get abortions
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 762 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 2 of 301 (297632)
03-23-2006 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by nator
03-23-2006 4:41 PM


Wow. Pretty powerful article. We humans are pretty damn good at "do as I say, not as I do."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nator, posted 03-23-2006 4:41 PM nator has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 762 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 13 of 301 (297650)
03-23-2006 6:36 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by riVeRraT
03-23-2006 5:32 PM


She looks like a crazy lady. Liberal supreme?
Looks like a normal Canadian to me. What the hell's eatin' you today, rR?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by riVeRraT, posted 03-23-2006 5:32 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by riVeRraT, posted 03-24-2006 5:50 AM Coragyps has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 762 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 37 of 301 (298118)
03-25-2006 5:23 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by macaroniandcheese
03-25-2006 12:59 PM


Re: Content, not looks or probable politics!
you know what the number one thing that sex ed does to kids? it makes them postpone their sexual activity.
"Abstinence-only" sex education does this, too. But there's a difference: 18 months after the class, when the kids from "A-o" class are out there doin' the horizontal bop, they are much less likely than kids that had real sex education to use condoms or other birth control. They're more likely to get pregnant or catch STD's. And I'll bet that makes them more likely to get an abortion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-25-2006 12:59 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-25-2006 5:48 PM Coragyps has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 762 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 58 of 301 (298265)
03-26-2006 9:33 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by riVeRraT
03-26-2006 7:42 AM


Re: Content, not looks or probable politics!
Why do you think the Old Testament was so strict about having sex?
Virginity was held with the highest regard in life,
Not to try to derail the topic, but loss of virginity in the OT was an affront to the virgin's daddy or husband-to-be. You stoned the girl to death because of those property issues, not because of her base immorality. Read Leviticus.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by riVeRraT, posted 03-26-2006 7:42 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by riVeRraT, posted 03-26-2006 7:06 PM Coragyps has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024