General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution Sequel

That's not what I'm talking about Percy. Look at message #121 and tell me there's no bias there.

No mistake.

No, it was a claim that I was personally attacking Jar, which was not the case. Moreover, my remark was not off-topic.An obvious bias.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The thread is not scientific, but philosophical, and should be moved.There should be a forum called "philosophy"--neither religious not scientific. I live, as Jar said, in a "philosophical fantasy world," and so often find it hard to find a slot for my topics.

What a load of political correctness. Those comparisons are not the same at all.

---

"A man with a good car doesn't have to be justified"---Flannery O'Connor

You want to go ahead and promote that thread by Faith about faith? Some are interested.

What is it that I know little about? Edited by AdminJar, : off topic for the thread

In which thread do I discuss my shortcomings?

How very amusing.

Percy closed the thread, saying that I should expect to be treated with contempt if I have the nerve to talk about something I know little about. So I wanted to know what it was I knew little about.If the answer is "logic," I have a problem with that. That's tantamount to saying that I am incapable of making a valid comment about any subject whatsoever.If the answer is "science," my answer is I don't discuss science except in some very general way, such as the rudiments of TOE, which, strangely enough, I do understand.Here's my dramatized view of the situation (from threads long past and recent):Robin: One cannot be both an evolutionist and a
Christian.
Jar: What did you say? I am both an evolutionist and a Christian. I have a list of 4000 Bishops who say they believe in evolution. You are hereby refuted.
Robin: What I meant was that it was logically inconsistent to--
Chiroptera: You don't understand logic!
Jazzn: He shouldn't even use the word "logic." Only I and those of my superior ilk should be able to use that word.
Chiroptera: Have you studied Peano arithmetic?
Catholic scientist: Do you have a world class education? I do. You are despicable.
Jar.: QED. You lose, Charley.
Percy: What are your credentials? You have none.
Robin: My credentials?
Moose: Whiner! Suspended for a week!revised to corrrect errors of wording. I wrote "creationist" when I meant "Christian."Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

Ok, I'll work on it. Thanks. I apologize for the thread "The Problems with EVC." It never should have been written: it was composed in anger.

You used the phrase "world-class university" in regard to yourself, boastingly. Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

You are right. My apologies, Catholic Scientist.