Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Georgia Passes Bill to Fund Bible Courses in Public High Schools
Posit
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 27 (299383)
03-29-2006 2:55 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Heathen
03-29-2006 1:58 PM


For those interested, the text of the bill can be found here:
Georgia General Assembly
A couple minor points first.
(D) Funds for the presentation of instruction shall be provided by the school board. If school board funding is not available, then the funds may be raised by the private sector;
This seems to leave the door open for churches to fund the classes.
(E) The teaching about religion in public schools and the presentation or offering of an elective course in Bible study, comparative religion, or both in the secondary schools is expressly permitted and is constitutional;
Maybe its commonplace, but it strikes me as odd to include in the wording of a law an assertion that the law is constitutional. It doesn't mention whether its referring to the Georgia or the U.S. Constitution, either.
The main problem I see with the bill is this: Its purpose is give permission for schools to teach a course on the Bible. Presumably without such legistlation schools cannot teach a course on any religious text. Therefore, by permitting teaching of the Bible without also permitting the teaching of other religious texts, the bill promotes one religion over another.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Heathen, posted 03-29-2006 1:58 PM Heathen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by crashfrog, posted 03-29-2006 3:07 PM Posit has replied

  
Posit
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 27 (299408)
03-29-2006 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by crashfrog
03-29-2006 3:07 PM


I suppose you're right. Its purpose isn't to give permission for teaching classes on the Bible, but to provide funding.
Still, while technically the funding could be used to teach a class on the Koran or some other religious text, given the bill's detailed guidelines for teaching classes on the Bible, it will be difficult to argue that the purpose and effect is not to promote one religious text over others.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by crashfrog, posted 03-29-2006 3:07 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Posit
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 27 (299444)
03-29-2006 7:04 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by subbie
03-29-2006 6:44 PM


There is also a substantial entanglement issue. There are many different christian denominations. Each of them has different takes on different portions of the bible. Exactly which interpretation will the state present? Or which version of the bible will be used? Certainly it's forseeable that the state could find itself entangled in a number of different religious problems in developing a curriculum.
The legislators appear to have anticipated this issue. The bill reads:
"No student shall be required to use one version as the sole text of the Old or New Testament. If a student desires to use as the basic text a different version of the Old or New Testament from that chosen by the local board of education or teacher, he or she shall be permitted to do so."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by subbie, posted 03-29-2006 6:44 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by jar, posted 03-29-2006 7:25 PM Posit has not replied
 Message 14 by subbie, posted 03-29-2006 8:33 PM Posit has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024