Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,812 Year: 4,069/9,624 Month: 940/974 Week: 267/286 Day: 28/46 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   In the begining...... nothing.... unless infinite past.
jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 6 of 79 (192640)
03-19-2005 9:23 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Christian7
03-19-2005 9:14 PM


Re: Okay, Funkaloyd is up first.
Respond to Funk. He has the floor. If you don't reply to his post he doesn't get notified.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Christian7, posted 03-19-2005 9:14 PM Christian7 has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 59 of 79 (299342)
03-29-2006 12:35 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by sidelined
03-29-2006 12:29 PM


Supersets and subsets
But if the qualities of God are supernatural then how can communication occur with the natural since this implies a natural means of alerting our physical senses?
How does GOD being supernatural preclude GOD from also using natual means? Can not Supernatural be a superset that includes natural as a subset?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by sidelined, posted 03-29-2006 12:29 PM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by sidelined, posted 03-29-2006 2:22 PM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 64 of 79 (299407)
03-29-2006 4:41 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by sidelined
03-29-2006 2:22 PM


Re: Supersets and subsets
I don't see that at all, sidelined.
Someone could speak english and canadian, and when speaking to canadians uses just those words.
Also, while we know that natural means cannot do those things we call supernatural, that does not mean that those things we call natural might not be done supernaturally.
It's entirely possible that the whole set Natural is but a part of, a member of a larger set Supernatural.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by sidelined, posted 03-29-2006 2:22 PM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by Posit, posted 03-29-2006 4:48 PM jar has replied
 Message 75 by sidelined, posted 04-08-2006 1:24 AM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 66 of 79 (299416)
03-29-2006 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Posit
03-29-2006 4:48 PM


Re: Supersets and subsets
No, not at all. I said supernatural is a superset.
Supernatural: Of or relating to existence outside the natural world.
Supernatural: Of or relating to actions or existence that cannot be explained by natural means.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Posit, posted 03-29-2006 4:48 PM Posit has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Posit, posted 03-29-2006 5:52 PM jar has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 70 of 79 (299442)
03-29-2006 6:54 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Posit
03-29-2006 6:14 PM


So I try rewording.
What I mean is not a mathematical relationship. John can read and write fluently in 20 different languages. Paul speaks and reads english only.
John's set of language capabilities is superior to Pauls. John though can also speak and read english, in addition to the 19 others.
Supernatural may well include everything we call natural, but in addition, other things we cannot recognize or understand.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Posit, posted 03-29-2006 6:14 PM Posit has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Posit, posted 03-29-2006 7:22 PM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 72 of 79 (299459)
03-29-2006 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by Posit
03-29-2006 7:22 PM


Re: So I try rewording.
yes, kinda.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Posit, posted 03-29-2006 7:22 PM Posit has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Posit, posted 03-29-2006 7:40 PM jar has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 74 of 79 (299464)
03-29-2006 7:47 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Posit
03-29-2006 7:40 PM


Re: So I try rewording.
Not going anywhere much. Simply asking sidelined a question about his post.
I happen to believe that GOD was the origin of at least what we call our universe, maybe more, but that is a personal belief, nothing more. It has little to do with cosmology other than the fact I listen to the cosmologists and say, "Oh, that's how GOD did it!"

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Posit, posted 03-29-2006 7:40 PM Posit has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 421 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 76 of 79 (302322)
04-08-2006 9:55 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by sidelined
04-08-2006 1:24 AM


Re: Supersets and subsets
If they were done supernaturally then would they not, by definition, be supernatural?
No, I don't think so. For example:
Jesus performs a miracle and turns water into wine. Now the water is completely natural. The wine is completely natural. All test show that they are just exactly what they seem to be, water and wine. They are just natural objects. But the miracle itself is supernatutral. It is not subject to test or examination.
What was water is now wine, and the best science can do is say that the cause is unknown.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by sidelined, posted 04-08-2006 1:24 AM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by sidelined, posted 04-08-2006 2:20 PM jar has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024