Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,783 Year: 4,040/9,624 Month: 911/974 Week: 238/286 Day: 45/109 Hour: 2/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Limestone Layers and the Flood
Christian
Member (Idle past 6281 days)
Posts: 157
Joined: 10-16-2005


Message 112 of 128 (299622)
03-30-2006 4:09 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by Percy
03-29-2006 8:34 PM


Re: Request that we address the topic
Percy,
You are the one that started this topic, so I want to respect your wishes to assume that the limestone is organic in nature. And again I am very ignorant in this field, so perhaps I'm misunderstanding something, but doesn't Message 111indicate that there is some debate about the origen of limestone (micrite in particular)?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Percy, posted 03-29-2006 8:34 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Percy, posted 03-30-2006 4:43 PM Christian has replied

  
Christian
Member (Idle past 6281 days)
Posts: 157
Joined: 10-16-2005


Message 116 of 128 (299636)
03-30-2006 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by roxrkool
03-30-2006 9:12 AM


Re: One small question.
roxrkool writes:
The orgin of micrite has a long history of debate. Originally it was thought to be exclusively of chemical origin, precipitating directly out of supersaturated sea water. During the 1970's and 1980's evidence and opinion steadily shifted all the way to a biochemical origin for micrite - the sediment coming from the breakdown of calcareous algae skeletons which live abundantly in modern carbonate environments.
More recent evidence is pointing back to some micrite being of chemical origin. This is one of those problems that is yet to have a definitive solution. Micrite, though, is probably a mixture of chemical and biochemical origin.
This looks like you're saying there is debate among scientists as to the origen of limestone. Is that what you're saying, or am I misunderstanding you because of my ignorance? If I am misunderstanding, then could you please explain to me what you are saying?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by roxrkool, posted 03-30-2006 9:12 AM roxrkool has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by roxrkool, posted 03-30-2006 7:03 PM Christian has not replied

  
Christian
Member (Idle past 6281 days)
Posts: 157
Joined: 10-16-2005


Message 117 of 128 (299642)
03-30-2006 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by Percy
03-30-2006 4:43 PM


Re: Request that we address the topic
I was going to quit for the day, but I couldn't resist this one.
Percy writes:
The short answer is that you're being flim-flammed into thinking there's any scientific doubt on the matter. If you want a longer answer I think you should propose your own thread.
I just might do that, and I don't intend to use much more space on your thread, but need to answer this.
Percy writes:
You keep alluding to your ignorance, but I don't think that's really a problem because ignorance is easily remedied. The real problem is that you don't know who to believe. Your inclination is to believe those telling you things consistent with your beliefs. You're also inclined to give credence to professional scientists.
The reason I was alluding to my ignorance was because the way I read roxrkool's post, it looked like she was saying that there was a debate. I thought that there was no debate among "professional scientists". So I thought maybe I was misunderstanding because of my ignorance.
Percy writes:
Are you a professional or is there something you're really good at, perhaps a craft or a sport?
I think I'm pretty good at raising kids. But there is a lot of debate among us professional kid-raisers as to the best methods, so I'm not sure that's a good one.
Percy writes:
Let me pick the medical profession, since everyone's been to the doctor.
Probably not a good one either, since I tend to distrust physicians, mainly because they make their money off of drugs and surgery. I think both are often not as necessary as they make it seem. I usually throw away prescriptions without filling them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Percy, posted 03-30-2006 4:43 PM Percy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024