Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,426 Year: 3,683/9,624 Month: 554/974 Week: 167/276 Day: 7/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   God is cruel
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 301 (300572)
04-03-2006 11:43 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Protomenace
04-02-2006 7:15 PM


I'd have to agree with jar on this one.
First let's make some assumptions. Let's assume that god is real, god created me, and atheists go to hell.
Assuming these premises are true, I could conclude that god is cruel.
But, I do not think that god is cruel, so I would have to say that the premise that is incorrect is that all atheists go to hell.
So, I have to assume that A. God is cruel. or B. God isn't real.
Just wanted to point our that you could assume the third one, the title of the thread, that god does exist and is cruel.
The discussion doesn't have to end at that though. One way to move forward would be to discuss this part:
Ok, so if god created me, didn't he make me the way I am?
and that if your actions are predetermined, and you are not responsible for them, then how can you be justly punished for something that you were made to do.
I would have to say that even though you were made the way you are, you are still responsible for your actions because the are not predetermined and you choose to do the things you do.
Do you choose to be atheist even though it is a result of the way you were created to deny things that lack evidence? and if you do not choose to be atheist, should you be punished for something you didn't choose to do?
I would say that god does not punish you for something that you didn't choose to do, and that being an atheist, because of the way you were created, does not warrant punishment. Punishment is deserved for the choices that you do make, the way you behave and treat other people. Simply being atheist is not enough to be punished, but being bad is; and if being bad is a result of your athiesm, then the atheism could indirectly warrant punishment, although atheism is not usually a cause for being bad.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Protomenace, posted 04-02-2006 7:15 PM Protomenace has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Chiroptera, posted 04-03-2006 12:36 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 301 (300574)
04-03-2006 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Brian
04-03-2006 11:30 AM


Re: Not to worry
This is kinda an off-tpoic question, but maybe you can quickly answer it and we don't have to derail the thread and everything will be fine.
I think Jesus was either a con man, a self deluded nut, some sort of social reformer, or a phantom.
I was just wondering why you left out the possibility that Jesus was the son of god and the things he claimed were true.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Brian, posted 04-03-2006 11:30 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Brian, posted 04-03-2006 11:48 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 301 (300577)
04-03-2006 11:51 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Brian
04-03-2006 11:48 AM


Re: Not to worry
I was just wondering why you left out the possibility that Jesus was the son of god and the things he claimed were true.
I do not believe in god(s).
Oh, ok, that makes sense, duh.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Brian, posted 04-03-2006 11:48 AM Brian has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 25 of 301 (300598)
04-03-2006 12:59 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Chiroptera
04-03-2006 12:36 PM


protomenace isn't talking about actions; he is talking about belief.
I know, I addressed that part.
I don't think belief alone will get you into hell, it takes actions too.
I could have left it at that but I saw no reason to just answer the question and stop the discussion. I'm saying that if the discussion is to move on we'd have to talk about actions and not just belief.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Chiroptera, posted 04-03-2006 12:36 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Chiroptera, posted 04-03-2006 1:04 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 301 (300631)
04-03-2006 2:43 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Chiroptera
04-03-2006 2:27 PM


Yeah! Why don't we each get a chance to eat or not eat the apple?
Evertime you make a decision between right and wrong you get that chance; when you choose wrong, you are 'eating the apple'.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Chiroptera, posted 04-03-2006 2:27 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Chiroptera, posted 04-03-2006 4:17 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 59 by Heathen, posted 04-03-2006 5:02 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 46 of 301 (300656)
04-03-2006 3:29 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Protomenace
04-03-2006 3:16 PM


Well, then either he exists and sends people to hell for making choices which he outlined in their creation, or he does not exist.
I don't think the choices you're going to make are outlined in your creation. I think we have free will so I can't pick between either of these.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Protomenace, posted 04-03-2006 3:16 PM Protomenace has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Protomenace, posted 04-03-2006 3:54 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 301 (300659)
04-03-2006 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Protomenace
04-03-2006 3:09 PM


Following the same principles of logic, would it not be correct to infer that if such a god exists (one that creates all), it would be indirectly responsible for all occurances in the universe it has created, including criminal behavior?
Well, it depends on what you mean by indirectly responsible. Like I said, I think you make the decisions, not that they are made for you beforehand.
Is god indirectly responsible, I'd say yes, but indirectly more than responsible. He doesn't make you do bad things, he isn't responsible for the bad things you do, but he did make you so he could be considered indirectly responsible for those bad things. This doesn't really affect the argument in my opinion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Protomenace, posted 04-03-2006 3:09 PM Protomenace has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by BMG, posted 04-03-2006 4:10 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 301 (300663)
04-03-2006 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Protomenace
04-03-2006 3:54 PM


What do you think causes you to make the choices you do?
I don't really know, I guess my feelings and desires.
Are your choices not defined by your personality and your environment?
Defined by? More like governed by, yeah.
Does god not control both of these?
I don't really know but I don't think that he does.
If he does not control personality, then how does it come about?
From genetics and upbringing, the way you were born and the way you were raised.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Protomenace, posted 04-03-2006 3:54 PM Protomenace has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Protomenace, posted 04-03-2006 4:20 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 301 (300665)
04-03-2006 4:17 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by BMG
04-03-2006 4:10 PM


Hello,
You mentioned decisions are not made for you beforehand. But what about the Divine Plan? Is it relative?
What do you mean 'is the divine plan relative?'?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by BMG, posted 04-03-2006 4:10 PM BMG has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by BMG, posted 04-03-2006 4:26 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 301 (300671)
04-03-2006 4:34 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Chiroptera
04-03-2006 4:17 PM


Heh. Well, I can dig that.
me too
Unfortunately, it then seems to make the Genesis story more of a metaphor than an actual historical event that had consequences
Well, its not really that unfortunate. I think the metaphor tries to explain some of the consequences. But I also have various interpretations of the story. The one is that the 'apple' is involved in all our moral decisions, like I already said. Another one I like is that taking the apple was when humans became modern in our intellect or when we became cognitive. Like, living in the garden was like being one of all the other animals in that seem mindless in nature and just be instinctual and live in harmony with nature yada yada yada. Then, for some reason, modern humans took a leap in intellegence and start taking matters into their own hands and found morals and conscience and all that. This is the taking of the apple, and being expelled from the garden is how we are no longer in harmony with nature, so to speak.
I don't know why I just typed all that, I hope it made sense, I'm not even gonna proof read it. I just felt like letting you know.
I think our evangelical cousins may have objections to that
Fuck 'em.
LOL, just kidding, but yeah, I don't care what they object too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Chiroptera, posted 04-03-2006 4:17 PM Chiroptera has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 301 (300674)
04-03-2006 4:40 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by BMG
04-03-2006 4:26 PM


what are your thoughts concerning the divine plan?
I think the divine plan can somehow coexist with free will (in some way that I am unable to explain, or perhaps understand even). But, if the divine plan and free will are mutually exclusive, I'll take the free will.
I'm curious because I'm assuming from your name that you would believe in the divine plan, but an earlier post you claimed that "decisions are not made beforehand".
Well, some of the assumtions you make about me because of my name will be correct and some won't, but don't assume that because 'Catholics', in general, believe something that all Catholics, individually, believe it too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by BMG, posted 04-03-2006 4:26 PM BMG has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 301 (300679)
04-03-2006 4:48 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by Protomenace
04-03-2006 4:20 PM


How could god not control genetics?
God can do whatever he wants and he can not-do what he doesn't want, IMO.
He created the riginal set of genes in the first people, and all sources of mutation, did he not?
I don't really know, I'd guess not.
How could god not control the environment?
God can do whatever he wants and he can not-do what he doesn't want, IMO.
He created everything in the environment did he not?
I don't really know, I'd guess not.
Its not like god is up there deciding where each individual air molecule in the environment is going in his great plan for the wind currents of that day. I think he is capable of doing that I just don't think that he actually is doing it. why bother?
In the same sense, I don't think he is controlling all of the dicisions of all the people running around down here, he lets them do whatever they want.
In his infinite knowledge, he's sure to know all of the interactions which will take place.
I think he could know all of the interactions that will take place but I don't know if he exercises that ability or not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Protomenace, posted 04-03-2006 4:20 PM Protomenace has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Protomenace, posted 04-03-2006 6:44 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 301 (300686)
04-03-2006 5:15 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Heathen
04-03-2006 5:02 PM


Seems there's a lot more chances for us to screw up than there was in Adam and Eve's years. they were forbiddden from eating an from a tree.
well I don't read genesis literally. I don't think Adam and Eve actually existed.
Seems nowadays we're all doomed from the word go...
Why does it seem that?
even if I do make the right choice.. will I revert to a pre fall scenario? will I get to walk around naked? will I no longer have to toil?
I have no idea.
justice indeed
indeed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Heathen, posted 04-03-2006 5:02 PM Heathen has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Heathen, posted 04-03-2006 5:34 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 97 of 301 (300852)
04-04-2006 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by Heathen
04-03-2006 5:34 PM


Creavolution writes:
Seems nowadays we're all doomed from the word go...
Catholic Scientist writes:
Why does it seem that?
Original sin. (if you subscribe to that notion)
Oh, that’s what you meant, yeah, I mean, with the things we have laid out as ”sin’, I’d say we are inclined to do them. The whole ”Fall’ thing, to me, means that we want to sin and from what I see, people (including myself) do a lot of sinning. But its no big deal because god forgives us, he isn’t all that cruel.
creavolution writes:
even if I do make the right choice.. will I revert to a pre fall scenario? will I get to walk around naked? will I no longer have to toil?
catholic scientist writes:
I have no idea.
So why then do you believe
catholic scientist writes:
Evertime you make a decision between right and wrong you get that chance; when you choose wrong, you are 'eating the apple'
I read Genesis metaphorically, that’s just one of the interpretations I get. I wrote another one some posts up. But it makes sense to me, when you sin, you choose to sin just like A&E chose to eat the apple, the effect is a separation from god, a spiritual ”death’ so to speak, but its not totally unforgivable or irreversible, God ain’t THAT cruel. Sure we can't get back 'into the garden' (which in my interpretation is the state that all the non-human animals are living in) but we aren't doomed either.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by Heathen, posted 04-03-2006 5:34 PM Heathen has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Brian, posted 04-04-2006 11:52 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 99 of 301 (300855)
04-04-2006 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 64 by Protomenace
04-03-2006 6:44 PM


So by your argument, these things(genes and environment) are totally random, and in that case not controlled by the person who finally ends up with the genes and such.
Well, you gotta play with the hand thats dealt to ya.
It's still not that person's fault
But the things(genes and environment) don't make the decision for the person, the person makes it so it is the person's fault. I don't suscribe to determinism, I think we have free will, I don't think that the decisions I'm going to make have already been made for me.
and in any case, even if god made such things randomly, he would still know what the outcome would be
I don't presume to know what god would know and I'd rather not argue about the limitations, or lack there-of, of omniscience.
And even if he doesn't excercise this ability, it's still not the person's fault. They just got unlucky with their genes and upbringing.
Nope, you still choose to sin. If, for some reason, you do something bad that was not a result of you choosing to do it, then that is not considered sinning, but there are bad things that you do that you choose to do, and those are sins.
So, if you do agree with your quote, why do you think that people who believe in god also hold people responsible for their actions?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by Protomenace, posted 04-03-2006 6:44 PM Protomenace has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Protomenace, posted 04-04-2006 2:54 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024