Jared v. Hovind

Hovind might believe in a young Earth but that doesn't make him correct, or anything more than a fraud for that matter. If he has a defensible position, why would he use an impossible and incorrect definition of evolution in the $250,000 challenge? I would not call criticism of Hovind a "cheap shot" when the man uses strawmen like the definition of evolution found in his challenge, has a PhD from a degree mill, and parrots back long-disproven claims while failing to accept any evidence that disagrees with him.