Creationists: Why is Evolution Bad Science?

its the only one science has unless you can find something that can stand up to the questions people ask We do know, through studing the structures of fossils and how they relate, plus the studies we do on current life that shows evolution in action
do you think scientists think they know everything? or do you think they make stuff up to make everything fit?

I'm sorry but where did i say you had to do this? I said unless there is a Theory that explains things better than ToE, the ToE is what there is. to add on to this if you are willing to accept what science says then why not the ToE unless it had nothing to do with the thoery and more to do with conflicting with your beliefs, then its not about science at all what are you talking about? I think everyone can agree its a theory, to argue this would be silly. But it appears to me that there is a large number of people who have decided that thoery = not factual or not what really happened, or using a difinition that makes the ToE not truthful in thier minds, from this post i think you may fall into this group
well guess what? a theory is what everything is in science if you havn't learned this then umm.. read a book

i didn't say anything about your beliefs, i was talking about why a person might decide not to believe the theories that science has produced, one being religious, the other, just plain unwillingness oh really, so now you would say that scientists are making stuff up then? lets see some evidence that they are. You really have no clue about science at all, if people make stuff up its really a bad thing to do if you want to be considered legit what the hell do you think a theory is then? it seems you think scientists sit around and make stuff up to create something out of thin air, sorry but no, a theory is a frame work of facts to explain things. All science is a interpretation of data, so what? are you just going to cherry pick what theories you feel are right and wrong? are you going to say Newtons theories are right but GR isn't? or QM is right bit Chaos theory isn't? There is only one scientific thoery that fits all the facts we have, it is the ToE, so far no one has come up with anything that answers the questions put forth, if you have questions go look and see if the ToE has answered them, it doesn't sound like you have looked that hard when we find evidence that adds to the stability of the theory that also adds to the picture, plus you are using theory wrong which is part of the problem for you. i think you need to read up on how scientists analyze the data they have on species, that includes fossils. Because from this post it sounds like you really don't know much about it there will always be questions,thats not the problem i see, the problem i see if people looking for answers in wrong places

The thing is it says why they accept this theory they have evidence of the symbiosis how do you know this not a fact? do you have evidence that this is wrong? your page has examples go read them its a theory on where the nuclei in cells came from. it is made up of facts - you still are using the terms wrong

Pure strawman arguement, no one ever said it wasn't created by humans, but to accept science you have to accept what we have found and build on it, not say "gee it doesn't make sense to me, it must be wrong or false"
i never said anything like theory = fact i said, theorys explain facts and information, if you think theories are considered facts you have no clue about science. Evolution is a fact, the THEORY of evolution explains evolution and how it works, if you do not understand this then i have cause to weep for this world. as in accept ok so i guess the law of gravity is out, since it is a THEORY, go walk off a building then. no, I am getting frustrated with your distortion of science. why would i be scareing you? thats me getting frustrated with your lack of comprehesion.
I'm not revering anyone i am saying that theories with evidence to back them up shouldn't be handwaved away because you have this general need to show you arn't a sheep. You have yet to give any reasons for why you don't accept a well defined theory other than this silliness as i have said theories are explainations of facts, the ToE is a theory of evolution if you can come up with a better one then do so
but handwaving it is just plain willfull ignorance. Your understanding of science needs some work, saying is just dismissing a major part of science, and is amazing in its absurdity considering how you distort science, no have any evidence that scientists do this? a qualified scientist wouldn't do this. If you know about theories you would know that a scientist who doesn't allow others to test his work would shoot his integrity down, science is self correcting, so i doubt real researchers out to produce unbias science would be that effected

You still confuse fact with theoriesNoun 1. scientific fact - an observation that has been confirmed repeatedly and is accepted as true (although its truth is never final)
observation - facts learned by observing; "he reported his observations to the mayor"theory - A set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.you dismiss a theory based on what exactly? i still do not understand this
it seems that you are not using the terms right and giving them strawman meanings rather than using them correctlythis is how it works Evolution is the phenomena, the ToE is the theory that explains it, thoeries are not considered facts they construct a frame work around facts - you are making a creo strawman
you need to go read more on science and how it works because you don't seem to have any understanding of how thoeries work
here's a good site Evolution is a Fact and a Theory

No, i see only a person who disagrees to disagree, at least the creos have reasons, even crazy ones, you have nothing. Your basis is pointless and useless if you have nothing to replace it with. how about you go read about the subjects instead of making basless claims, saying this junk makes you intellectually dishonest the arrogance you show, shows only your misunderstanding of science and how it works, and you misunderstand what i say. do you bother reading my posts or are you just ranting? My beef is your distorting science and how it works, to make it look like a joke. good to see you know more than you have shown you do, this is how it works abiogenesis is not really explored yet, this has nothing to do with evolution ask the biochemists there is a working framwork for this its abiogenesis, go read about iti think your beef has little to do with science but your lack of knowlege about it, if these are your questions they are answered enough for a start

It was me, i gave up on this when i realized i was saying the samething over and over again without any really response.

---

Jesus saves..
and only takes half damage