Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,468 Year: 3,725/9,624 Month: 596/974 Week: 209/276 Day: 49/34 Hour: 0/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution Simplified
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 109 of 170 (311294)
05-11-2006 11:48 PM
Reply to: Message 108 by crashfrog
05-11-2006 11:35 PM


Re: Generalizations
As it stands, the rate for mutagenesis in mammalian nuclear DNA, in terms of single-point substitutions, is 1 per every 3.6 billion base pair replications, according to my wife's phylogenetics text.
I'm not sure what that 7th word means, but it sounds like mutation doesn't happen very often.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by crashfrog, posted 05-11-2006 11:35 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 12:00 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 111 by crashfrog, posted 05-12-2006 12:01 AM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 112 of 170 (311303)
05-12-2006 12:04 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by crashfrog
05-12-2006 12:01 AM


Re: Generalizations
1) hundreds of times every second in your skin as new skin cells and hair are grown and the lining of your digestive tract is replaced, plus
2) thousands of times per second as your bone marrow replicates and differentiates new cells to replace the contents of your blood; plus
3) 1.5 million times a day as your testes produce sperm (assuming you're a man), plus
4) whatever assorted other cell division is going on in your body.
So, for every act of cell division per day that comes to (millions), we should expect the new sequence of DNA to differ from the old one in 1 or 2 different places.
So are mutations frequent or not?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by crashfrog, posted 05-12-2006 12:01 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by crashfrog, posted 05-12-2006 12:06 AM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 114 of 170 (311305)
05-12-2006 12:08 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by crashfrog
05-12-2006 12:06 AM


Re: Generalizations
If my post didn't answer your question, I guess I don't know what you mean by "frequent." We estimate that any one human being has between 5 and 500 mutations. Every single human. Would you characterize that as "frequent"? I'd say that it's "sufficient."
I mean in the ones that matter as regards evolution--the ones that get passed on. Say, in your standard litter of pups.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been edited by robinrohan, 05-11-2006 11:08 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by crashfrog, posted 05-12-2006 12:06 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by crashfrog, posted 05-12-2006 12:12 AM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 116 of 170 (311309)
05-12-2006 12:16 AM
Reply to: Message 115 by crashfrog
05-12-2006 12:12 AM


Re: Generalizations
I would estimate that each pup would have between 5 and 500 mutations, individually.
Just a question:
Mutation is not the same thing as imperfect replication, is it? I thought that meant that the female and male combinations would result in a baby that did not look exactly like the mamma or the papa due to the combination.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by crashfrog, posted 05-12-2006 12:12 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by crashfrog, posted 05-12-2006 12:21 AM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 118 of 170 (311318)
05-12-2006 12:46 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by crashfrog
05-12-2006 12:21 AM


Re: Generalizations
So the term "imperfect replication" does not mean the same thing as "sexual recombination"?
One does get mixed signals on this forum.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by crashfrog, posted 05-12-2006 12:21 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by Brad McFall, posted 05-12-2006 8:24 AM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 125 by crashfrog, posted 05-12-2006 1:04 PM robinrohan has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 121 of 170 (311408)
05-12-2006 12:14 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Chiroptera
05-03-2006 6:01 PM


6. Conclusion: From 3, 4, and 5 we can conclude that organisms with the traits that make them more likely to survive and reproduce will produce offspring with those traits,
Are traits always passed on to the next generation? Suppose there was a person born with blue eyes for the first time and suppose these blue eyes were helpful to survival and reproduction. Does this mean that this trait is automatically going to be passed on? Could his or her offspring have brown eyes?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Chiroptera, posted 05-03-2006 6:01 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 12:28 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 124 by Wounded King, posted 05-12-2006 12:45 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 122 of 170 (311409)
05-12-2006 12:15 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by Lithodid-Man
05-12-2006 4:50 AM


Re: questioning facts
In my opinion you have asked good questions on this topic.
You're about the only one who thinks so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by Lithodid-Man, posted 05-12-2006 4:50 AM Lithodid-Man has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 127 of 170 (311443)
05-12-2006 3:23 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by Wounded King
05-12-2006 12:45 PM


Re: Heritable traits
If the basis of his blue eyes was genetic then a classical genetic analysis like Kuresu has done will tell you the likelihood of the gene being passed on
I thought he meant that the trait was definitely going to be passed on, but it might be recessive, which I assume means that it might turn up in the phenotype in later generations.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by Wounded King, posted 05-12-2006 12:45 PM Wounded King has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 3:56 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 128 of 170 (311445)
05-12-2006 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by EZscience
05-12-2006 3:06 PM


Re: Clarifying sexual recombination
Actually, what you are talking about is simply shared parental genetic representation in the offspring of diploid species.
I didn't get all that, but what I want to know is if every baby is mutated.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by EZscience, posted 05-12-2006 3:06 PM EZscience has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 131 by EZscience, posted 05-12-2006 4:07 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 129 of 170 (311452)
05-12-2006 3:38 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by robinrohan
05-11-2006 4:45 PM


Chiroptera
Perhaps most species are increasing but haven't been doing so for very long, or perhaps the rate of increase is so small we don't notice it. Is that theoretically possible?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by robinrohan, posted 05-11-2006 4:45 PM robinrohan has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 132 of 170 (311469)
05-12-2006 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by kuresu
05-12-2006 3:56 PM


Re: Heritable traits
BB is homozygous dominant, and neither carries the blue-eye gene or expresses it
OK, so it's very possible for a "positive" trait to disappear within one generation, in which case it would have no evolutionary significance, correct? But we could even say that it could extend for a few generations and then disappear. But I guess the more generations it got passed down, the more likely it would be to become permanent (since more indivduals would possess it), other conditions being equal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 3:56 PM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 4:18 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 133 of 170 (311472)
05-12-2006 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by EZscience
05-12-2006 4:07 PM


Re: Clarifying sexual recombination
Since mutation occurs randomly, albeit not with equal probability on all portions of the genome, the odds are that we all carry a number of mutations that occurred during the formation of the gametes that gave rise to us when they formed a zygote.
So any mutations that have evolutionary significance occur during conception, when the strand from one double helix meshes with a strand from that of the mate, and what happens is that they don't all mesh properly?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by EZscience, posted 05-12-2006 4:07 PM EZscience has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 4:37 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 138 by EZscience, posted 05-12-2006 4:37 PM robinrohan has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 135 of 170 (311484)
05-12-2006 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by kuresu
05-12-2006 4:18 PM


Re: Heritable traits
Not entirely ture. As in the case of the blue-eye example that you started. Given the condition that I assumed (blue is reccesive), it would get passed down to the offspring, based off of statistical probability
So some of the offspring MUST have the trait, just not all of them?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 4:18 PM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 4:31 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 139 of 170 (311490)
05-12-2006 5:01 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by kuresu
05-12-2006 4:37 PM


Re: Clarifying sexual recombination
These are the ones that happen while you body is making sperm or eggs (depending on your sex).
OK, I got it now. You're right; I didn't understand what EZscience was saying. It's confusing. There seem to be so many different types of mutation.
This message has been edited by robinrohan, 05-12-2006 04:01 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 4:37 PM kuresu has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 140 of 170 (311492)
05-12-2006 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by kuresu
05-12-2006 4:31 PM


Re: Heritable traits
Unless for some reason all the offspring were born homozygous dominant in the example we've been using, the answer is yes.
OK, then it's not an absolute. It's possible, though perhaps unlikely, that a positive trait would appear and not be passed down.
So what you need is not only this appearance of a positive trait but also that individual has to mate with the right partner. Otherwise evolution will not occur.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 4:31 PM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 5:14 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 147 by kuresu, posted 05-12-2006 5:38 PM robinrohan has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024