I disprove his main points so instead of continuing to defend them, he simply brings in more. The good news is that he will eventually run out of things for me to disprove.
quote:
Evolutionists teach that red giant stars chang into white dwarf stars over millions of years; yet sirius is an example of a red star becoming a white within the past 2,000 years. Ancient astronomers described Sirius as glowing red in the sky, Yet now it is categorized as white. So this proves that evolutionists teachings on this are wrong and makes there other findings questionable.
Jupiter and Saturn, these two planets radiate more heat then they recieve from the sun. If they were billions of years old, both planets would have reached equilibrium and no longer be able to lose more hear then they recieve. So this is revelent cause this means that the universe itself is younger then it seems. Which means that it is more fiting towards biblical times then Evolutionists times.
The water in the ocean contains 3.6% dissolved minerals, giving the ocean its salinity. Salt, compost of elemnts sodium and chlorine, is the the primary mineral. For years scientis have been measuring the amount of sodium in the oceans and have found that an estimated 457 million tons are are deposited into the oceans anualy, while only 122 million tons leave the ocean via numerous methods.
Given the current amount of salt in the oceans, the data strongly favors a recent creation and Global flood. If applied to the evolutionists time frame of millions of years the oceans would be saturated by salt. Even using liveral estimates the salinity levels are maximum possible age of 62 million years. Not possible for 4.6 billion years. Which makes evolutionists beliefs false.
EDIT: PS - with spelling like this, I'd question any of his findings.
This message has been edited by SR71, 05-12-2006 11:26 AM
™ Version 4.2