Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Model of the Trinity--in a Basketball Arena?
Phat
Member
Posts: 18298
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 91 of 100 (302642)
04-09-2006 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by jar
04-09-2006 2:41 PM


Human is as Human does
jar writes:
Again, it's actions Phat, not belief, nor profession, and not even big flashy miracles. Giving a cup of water to the thirsty is all that's needed.
OK. So the messenger is human. Did he ever lust after a woman? Did He ever use His Fathers name in vain? Did He ever covet His neighbors __________? I think that it is important whether or not Jesus was a sinnin ordinary guy with a cool message or whether He actually was the One human who successfully lived a perfect life.
It is one thing to bring him down to our level.
Its another thing to recognize that we are not Jesus and that He is at another level that we can get to through Him. (And I DO mean ALL of us! Im not establishing a special members only Holy Rollars club! My point is this: Doing your best is admirable and special. He was talking to Jews who already had been chosen as a people, however. They were already potentially in the Body.
Giving cups of cool water to kids is admirable, I must admit! Sometimes a cup of cool water says more than a whole sermon ever could!
This message has been edited by Phat, 04-09-2006 12:57 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by jar, posted 04-09-2006 2:41 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by ReverendDG, posted 04-09-2006 8:03 PM Phat has not replied

  
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4130 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005


Message 92 of 100 (302707)
04-09-2006 8:03 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by Phat
04-09-2006 2:56 PM


Re: Human is as Human does
I could post about the fact that jesus being pure and unsinful isn't a new concept
I think jesus's messege was more meaningful than all the miricals we could imagine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by Phat, posted 04-09-2006 2:56 PM Phat has not replied

  
DeclinetoState
Member (Idle past 6458 days)
Posts: 158
Joined: 01-16-2006


Message 93 of 100 (305819)
04-21-2006 10:51 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Legend
04-08-2006 8:45 AM


Verses proving Jesus was God
Legend writes:
dancer writes:
He was never only a man. No man on earth could have lived a life like He did. He was fully a God and fully a human. A perfect man as well as a perfect God. He had all the power in His hands, but he never revealed it in its true glory.
DeclinetoState writes:
And scriptures that tell us this are . . .
(Matt. 2:2,11; 14:33, Jos 5:13-15, Mar 5:6).
(Heb. 1:8)
(John 5:19).
(Acts 7:59).
(1 Pet. 2:22; Heb. 4:15).
(John 21:17).
(John 10:28).
(Col. 2:9).
Matt. 2:
2 "Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we saw His star in the east and have come to worship Him."
11 After coming into the house they saw the Child with Mary His mother; and they fell to the ground and worshiped Him. Then, opening their treasures, they presented to Him gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh.
(All references NASB)
Jesus was worshipped, therefore he was God. How the shepherds knew he was God is not mentioned, of course.
Jos. 5:13-15: This is the encounter between Joshua and the captain of the Lord's army. Other than the fact that Joshua and Jesus are the same name (Jesus is from the Hellenized form of Y'shua or Yehoshua, i.e., Joshua), there is no evidence that the captain was Jesus, unless one already believes that Jesus was God. But this is trying to prove something a posteriori while at the same time accepting it as a premise a priori (or something like that)--in short, circular reasoning.
Heb 1:
8But of the Son He says,
"(A)YOUR THRONE, O GOD, IS FOREVER AND EVER,
AND THE RIGHTEOUS SCEPTER IS THE SCEPTER OF [a]HIS KINGDOM.
[CAPS original]
This passage is a quote from Psalm 45:6. Psalm 45 is usually taken as being addressed to a king:
1My heart overflows with a good theme;
I address my verses to the King;
My tongue is the pen of a ready writer.
2You are fairer than the sons of men;
(B)Grace is poured upon Your lips;
Therefore God has blessed You forever.
Some thus maintain that v. 6 should read: "God is your throne," and that Heb. 1:8 should be translated accordingly.
John 5:
19 Therefore Jesus answered and was saying to them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, unless it is something He sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, these things the Son also does in like manner.
If the Son is God, but "the Son can do nothing of Himself," how does that square with God's omnipotence?
Acts 7:
59 They went on stoning Stephen as he called on the Lord and said, "Lord Jesus, receive my spirit!"
Assuming this is an accurate quote of Stephen's last words, I'm not sure how it shows that he believes Jesus was God. It's possible to assert that, of course, but I don't think the statement is unambiguous. I don't seek high theology or Christology in the words of a man, however pious he may be, as he's being stoned to death.
1 Peter 2:
21 For you have been called for this purpose, since Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example for you to follow in His steps,
22 WHO COMMITTED NO SIN, NOR WAS ANY DECEIT FOUND IN HIS MOUTH;
[CAPS original]
Great. Jesus didn't sin. I don't know how that alone shows he was or is God, that he was "fully God," or that God is a Trinity.
Hebrews 4:
15 For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin.
Ditto.
John 21:
17 He said to him the third time, "Simon, son of John, do you love Me?" Peter was grieved because He said to him the third time, "Do you love Me?" And he said to Him, "Lord, You know all things; You know that I love You " Jesus said to him, "Tend My sheep.
Other than Peter's assertion (probably while annoyed, as this is the third time around for this little dialogue) that Jesus knows "all things," I don't see much of an assertion that Jesus was God.
John 10:
28 and I give eternal life to them, and they will never perish; and no one will snatch them out of My hand.
This may be the best assertion that Jesus was God, though one could still assert, as some do, that Jesus was simply acting as God's agent, not as God himself.
Col 2:
9 For in Him all the fullness of Deity dwells in bodily form,
If we can all agree as to what the "fullness of Deity" means, then maybe we can get somewhere. In any event, we also have to accept that this passage was truly inspired, and not reflecting the Pauline propaganda and biases that may have crept into an early understanding of the Christian faith. But those are issues beyond the scope of this thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Legend, posted 04-08-2006 8:45 AM Legend has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by Legend, posted 04-23-2006 8:05 PM DeclinetoState has not replied
 Message 95 by dancer, posted 04-30-2006 6:34 AM DeclinetoState has replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5026 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 94 of 100 (306192)
04-23-2006 8:05 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by DeclinetoState
04-21-2006 10:51 PM


Re: Verses proving Jesus was God
quote:
Matt. 2:2,11; 14:33, Jos 5:13-15, Mar 5:6. Jesus is worshipped.
Even excluding Jos 5:13-15, the other two references show that Jesus was worshipped not only by men but also by demons. How many men can claim that ?
quote:
(Heb. 1:8) Jesus is called God.
DeclinetoState writes:
Some thus maintain that v. 6 should read: "God is your throne," and that Heb. 1:8 should be translated accordingly.
what does it mean "God is your throne" ?? God is nobody else's throne. This is best translated as "your throne...O God". God the Father is calling Jesus God!
Yes, Psalm 45 is dealing with a king which would make one wonder why he would be addressed as God. But, it is not uncommon for NT writers to take a verse in the OT that seemingly deals with one subject and apply it to another. In fact, in Ezekiel 28:12-17 is a section that deals with the fall of the devil. Verse 13 says describes how he was in the garden of Eden. Verse 14 says he was the anointed cherub, (v. 15), etc. But the context of this section begins with an address to the king of Tyre (v. 12). Yet, right after Ezekiel is told to write to the King of Tyre he then goes on to describe what the great majority of theologians agree with is a description of the devil's fall. So, we need to look at the context that the writer of Hebrews put Psalm 45:6 into. He addressed it to Jesus.
quote:
(John 5:19) Jesus can do the things that God, the Father can
DeclinetoState writes:
If the Son is God, but "the Son can do nothing of Himself," how does that square with God's omnipotence?
that the Son can do nothing of Himself doesn't show lack of potence, it shows unity of will. The next sentence confirms this as it says that Jesus can do whatever the Father can. That he can't do anything of Himself just shows that his Will is at one with the Father's, he can't so anything that the father doesn't will and vice versa. This verse shows that Jesus and the Father share the same will and the same power.
quote:
(Acts 7:59). Jesus is prayed to.
DeclinetoState writes:
Assuming this is an accurate quote of Stephen's last words, I'm not sure how it shows that he believes Jesus was God
well, Jesus himself taught the disciples to pray to the Father ( Luke 11:1-2, Matthew 6:9-13).
Luke 23:46 records Jesus's prayer to the Father from the scene of crucifixion:
"And when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, "Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit"" (Luke 23:46)
Compare this with Acts 7:59, what Stephen says :
"And they stoned Stephen, calling upon [God], and [he] saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit. ."
As the author of Luke was the writer of both Acts and the Gospel of Luke he obviously saw the same function in both cases, as he uses the same words to describe both. Jesus prayed to the Father and Stephen prayed to Jesus. Both the Father and Jesus are shown to play the same role: to hear the prayer and receive the spirit.
quote:
(John 21:17). Jesus knew all things
DeclinetoState writes:
Other than Peter's assertion (probably while annoyed, as this is the third time around for this little dialogue) that Jesus knows "all things," I don't see much of an assertion that Jesus was God.
Jesus doesn't say "look Pete, I don't really know all things", not even "no need for sarcasm now Peter". He implicitly accepts Peter's assertion and tells him to go tend his sheep.
which is the only entity in the Bible purported to know all things ? (1 John 3:20)
quote:
(Col. 2:9) The fullness of deity dwells in Jesus (Col. 2:9)
DeclinetoState writes:
If we can all agree as to what the "fullness of Deity" means, then maybe we can get somewhere.
The fullness of Deity is exactly what the name suggests. Not half a Deity, not a partial Deity but the Full Deity dwells in Jesus.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by DeclinetoState, posted 04-21-2006 10:51 PM DeclinetoState has not replied

  
dancer
Inactive Member


Message 95 of 100 (307861)
04-30-2006 6:34 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by DeclinetoState
04-21-2006 10:51 PM


Re: Verses proving Jesus was God
Today, for the Orthodox Church, is Tomas' Sunday. We honour the incident when Jesus appeared in front of Tomas so that he would believe. Most specifically, what is honoured is Tomas' confession:
John, 20 verses 27-29:
In Greek and English:
27 , ‘ ‘ , ‘ , ‘, ‘‘.
afterwards, he says to Tomas. Bring your finger here and see my hands and bring your hands and touch my side and do not be unfaithful but faithful.
28 . ‘ ‘ .
and Tomas answered and said to Him: My Lord and my God.

29 ‘. ‘ , ‘. ‘ ‘‘.
And Jesus says to him: you believed because you saw me. fortunate will be those who will not see but will believe.
Tomas called Jesus his God and his Lord and Jesus did not correct him. On the contrary, He pointed out that those who will not need as much visual proof as Tomas, will be fortunate.
In greek, we see the phrases: " ‘ " and " ‘ "
"" means Lord, "‘" means God, "" means my. The "O" before the two nouns is an article like "the" but it is used for masculin words. This "" gives the sense of uniqueness, like "my only God, there is no other God". I would also like to point out that "Tomas answered and said to Him", which means that he directly answered to Jesus.
This message has been edited by dancer, 04-30-2006 06:48 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by DeclinetoState, posted 04-21-2006 10:51 PM DeclinetoState has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by DeclinetoState, posted 05-01-2006 2:01 PM dancer has replied

  
DeclinetoState
Member (Idle past 6458 days)
Posts: 158
Joined: 01-16-2006


Message 96 of 100 (308236)
05-01-2006 2:01 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by dancer
04-30-2006 6:34 AM


John 20:28 - Did Thomas confess Jesus as God?
We're getting a bit off-topic here, since I started out trying to see if there was anything in our present-day experience that models the Trinity, and now we're getting (back) to the issue of whether the Bible teaches the Trinity at all. However, the passage at John 20:28 does seem to warrant some comment:
Thomas' Actions Don't Agree With His Alleged Confession
It is important to note that the interpretation of Thomas’ words as a confession of his doctrinal beliefs about the Godhood of Christ depend entirely on our interpretation of the words Thomas said. No corroberating evidence is given in the context for this interpretation; and if this interpretation is correct, this omission is very strange indeed.
Think for a moment: How does a normal human being respond when he finds out that the human being he thought he was in the presence of is in reality his God? What does he do? Does he pray? Does he utter words of praise? Does he offer sacrifice to his God? Perhaps in our own sacreligious and apathetic day, a simple verbal response, such as that allegedly offered by Thomas, would be judged sufficient; but would this have been the case in the first century?
In Acts 14:8-18, we get the reaction of people who believed they were in the presence of gods. It seems that Thomas didn't react similarly. A spontaneous reaction to a surprising revelation (coupled with doubt leading to guilt) should not be the basis for a major portion of Christian doctrine.
These people could hardly be restrained from offering sacrifice to those who they wrongly thought were gods. Next to their ardent zeal, the response of Thomas seems strangely underwhelming. Supposedly in the presence of the Almighty God, he is not moved enough even to bow down. He is not afraid, and, other than saying, "My Lord and my God," he utters no words of worship. He does absolutely nothing which confirms the conclusion that he believes that Jesus is God.
Source

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by dancer, posted 04-30-2006 6:34 AM dancer has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by dancer, posted 05-02-2006 5:16 AM DeclinetoState has not replied
 Message 98 by jaywill, posted 05-05-2006 2:22 PM DeclinetoState has replied

  
dancer
Inactive Member


Message 97 of 100 (308390)
05-02-2006 5:16 AM
Reply to: Message 96 by DeclinetoState
05-01-2006 2:01 PM


Re: John 20:28 - Did Thomas confess Jesus as God?
It is crystal clear that Tomas was talking to Jesus, recognising that He is his Lord and God and that Jesus did not tell him that he was wrong, or that he exagerated etc. On the contrary, His answer indicates that He has accepted Tomas' declaration. And really, why would Jesus wish to mislead Tomas?
PS: I never claimed that this is the only incident that proves Jesus' divine nature.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by DeclinetoState, posted 05-01-2006 2:01 PM DeclinetoState has not replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 98 of 100 (309408)
05-05-2006 2:22 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by DeclinetoState
05-01-2006 2:01 PM


The Source, the Course, and the Flow
DeclinetoState,
We're getting a bit off-topic here, since I started out trying to see if there was anything in our present-day experience that models the Trinity, and now we're getting (back) to the issue of whether the Bible teaches the Trinity at all.
I like the example of the power plant, the electric cables, and the electricity.
The power plant far away is the source of the electical power. The cables are the course which connect the house to the power plant far away. And the cables are the medium over which the electricity flows. This flow of electricity from the power plant and over the cables brings the current of the electrical force into the house.
The Father corresponds to the power plant. The Father is the source. The Son Jesus Christ corresponds to the wires; the cable. That is the course that connects the source to the receiving house. And the flow of the electricity electrical energy itsell corresponds to the Holy Spirit as the life and nature of God from the Father, through the Son, flowing into man.
The Father is the Source of the divine life.
The Son is the Course of the divine life.
And the Holy Spirit is the Flow of the divine life.
God is a Trinity for the imparting of His divine life into humanity.
This is not a perfect illustration. But I have found it one of the best that I know.
This message has been edited by jaywill, 05-05-2006 02:23 PM
This message has been edited by jaywill, 05-05-2006 02:24 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by DeclinetoState, posted 05-01-2006 2:01 PM DeclinetoState has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by DeclinetoState, posted 05-12-2006 1:40 AM jaywill has replied

  
DeclinetoState
Member (Idle past 6458 days)
Posts: 158
Joined: 01-16-2006


Message 99 of 100 (311323)
05-12-2006 1:40 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by jaywill
05-05-2006 2:22 PM


Re: The Source, the Course, and the Flow
quote:
The Father corresponds to the power plant. The Father is the source. The Son Jesus Christ corresponds to the wires; the cable. That is the course that connects the source to the receiving house. And the flow of the electricity electrical energy itsell corresponds to the Holy Spirit as the life and nature of God from the Father, through the Son, flowing into man.
That looks like an Orthodox (big O) view of the Trinity (i.e., the Spirit comes from the Father through the Son), rather than the Western (RC and Protestant) belief that the Spirit comes from the Father and the Son.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by jaywill, posted 05-05-2006 2:22 PM jaywill has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 100 by jaywill, posted 05-13-2006 9:03 AM DeclinetoState has not replied

  
jaywill
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 4519
From: VA USA
Joined: 12-05-2005


Message 100 of 100 (311721)
05-13-2006 9:03 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by DeclinetoState
05-12-2006 1:40 AM


Re: The Source, the Course, and the Flow
That looks like an Orthodox (big O) view of the Trinity (i.e., the Spirit comes from the Father through the Son), rather than the Western (RC and Protestant) belief that the Spirit comes from the Father and the Son.
In my view either way of stating the above is scriptural.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by DeclinetoState, posted 05-12-2006 1:40 AM DeclinetoState has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024