Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,351 Year: 3,608/9,624 Month: 479/974 Week: 92/276 Day: 20/23 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Beneficial Mutations Made Simple
IrishRockhound
Member (Idle past 4455 days)
Posts: 569
From: Ireland
Joined: 05-19-2003


Message 1 of 52 (312344)
05-16-2006 7:48 AM


I thought it was, perhaps, time to take a look at this subject again after reading a post by romajc in another thread.
Beneficial mutations - traditionally creationists assert that they do not occur, as far as I'm aware. Their position is that all mutations are harmful and adversely affect a creature's survivability, or neutral and do nothing - part of the notion that creatures are "degrading" since the Fall of Man, and cannot be improved as such.
Of course, evolution is simply a compilation of many, many beneficial mutations which, after a very long time, alter a creature to the extent that we may classify it as a seperate species. One single mutation may be very minor, but it is the sum of all the mutations that makes evolution - little steps along a path adding up to miles and miles travelled, if you will - and there is no concieveable limit to it as long as we can show that beneficial mutations occur constantly.
So - it may be beneficial () to creationists if we list some simple examples of such mutations, and explain why they are so and why they will be passed to the next generation.
My example: My mother is missing four molars, so she has only one set per jaw instead of two. I have inherited this mutation, and I am missing two wisdom teeth as well. It is beneficial because my teeth are very easy to clean, hence my teeth are very healthy and I have no fillings or anything. It has not effected my ability to eat at all.
Assume for a minute that I am a prehistoric human. As my teeth are very healthy due to my mutations, I will retain them longer than someone without those mutations - so I can eat better for longer than them and will probably live longer as a result. Let's assume as well that my tribe find teeth aesthetically pleasing in a mate - I am more likely to find a mate than someone toothless. Both these environmental conditions will give me a higher chance to reproduce and pass on my mutations.
In modern times those conditions are absent, so my chance to reproduce is not affected per se. But having healthy teeth is a nice bonus. Bear in mind that this is an illustrative example and probably isn't entirely accurate, but it does describe how beneficial mutations are selected for and passed on.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminWounded, posted 05-16-2006 8:01 AM IrishRockhound has not replied
 Message 5 by Wounded King, posted 05-16-2006 9:22 AM IrishRockhound has not replied
 Message 6 by jar, posted 05-16-2006 10:52 AM IrishRockhound has not replied
 Message 7 by EZscience, posted 05-16-2006 1:41 PM IrishRockhound has not replied
 Message 8 by Percy, posted 05-16-2006 3:23 PM IrishRockhound has replied
 Message 11 by Hyroglyphx, posted 05-18-2006 12:07 PM IrishRockhound has not replied

  
IrishRockhound
Member (Idle past 4455 days)
Posts: 569
From: Ireland
Joined: 05-19-2003


Message 9 of 52 (313138)
05-18-2006 9:11 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Percy
05-16-2006 3:23 PM


Everyone's a comedian.
And of course environmental factors are important in whether the mutations are beneficial or not. This is why I asked that people explain why a particular mutation would be selected for - to explain the conditions that cause it to be beneficial.
No creationists want to step in here, ask questions?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Percy, posted 05-16-2006 3:23 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by jar, posted 05-18-2006 10:37 AM IrishRockhound has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024