Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,857 Year: 4,114/9,624 Month: 985/974 Week: 312/286 Day: 33/40 Hour: 5/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Beneficial Mutations Made Simple
EZscience
Member (Idle past 5182 days)
Posts: 961
From: A wheatfield in Kansas
Joined: 04-14-2005


Message 7 of 52 (312464)
05-16-2006 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by IrishRockhound
05-16-2006 7:48 AM


Context matters...
Both the context of the organism in which the mutation occurs, and the environmental context in which it finds itself.
Labelling a mutation 'beneficial' is a very loaded statement.
It might be benficial in one context, but not in another.
The same can be said for some deleterious mutations - they are not always deleterious in all contexts.
For example, a mutation for pyrethroid resistance in whiteflies is only beneficial to the whitefly population when it is useful for surviving heavy insecticide applications. When more effective biological controls are established in greenhouses, the incidence of the resistance gene decreases. This is because it is no longer 'beneficial', but is in fact 'less adaptive' that its pyrethroid-susceptible analogue in the absence of the selection pressure.
Also, we need to remember that many mutations are neutral or functionally equivalent, at least until the population's adaptive topography changes...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by IrishRockhound, posted 05-16-2006 7:48 AM IrishRockhound has not replied

  
EZscience
Member (Idle past 5182 days)
Posts: 961
From: A wheatfield in Kansas
Joined: 04-14-2005


Message 31 of 52 (313727)
05-19-2006 9:53 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by mr_matrix
05-19-2006 8:59 PM


Rarity of intellect
mr.matrix writes:
There is no need for mathematical calculations. They are usual works of evolutionists where they dive in details that are no longer related to evolution.
Mathematics is the core language of science, not simply evolution.
Try engineering anything without it.
mr.matrix writes:
. they dont realy prove the main point that we're missing:
You mean why you think you have enough education to come and post in a science forum?
Are you here to learn something, or simply to be outspoken in your lack of knowledge?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by mr_matrix, posted 05-19-2006 8:59 PM mr_matrix has not replied

  
EZscience
Member (Idle past 5182 days)
Posts: 961
From: A wheatfield in Kansas
Joined: 04-14-2005


Message 46 of 52 (315144)
05-25-2006 2:23 PM


Protein stability and global warming
Most proteins with complex functions (like enzymes) are very temperature sensitive. Simple mutations that result in replacement of one or two amino acids can affect the temperature sensitivity of functional proteins, for example the temperature of activation of an enzyme, because they affect the folding structure and structural integrity of the molecule, although not necessarily the active site.
As organisms become exposed to warmer and warmer temperatures as a consequence of climate change, some such mutations will inevitably become 'beneficial' (even if they are currently neutral or disadvantageous) simply because proteins will be required that can function effectively at a higher range of temperatures.
As our climate warms, any mutation confering improved heat tolerance could become beneficial.
Edited by EZscience, : No reason given.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024