Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,762 Year: 4,019/9,624 Month: 890/974 Week: 217/286 Day: 24/109 Hour: 0/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Big Bang and Cosmology ⇒

GRAVITY PROBLEMS -- off topic from {Falsifying a young Universe}

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   GRAVITY PROBLEMS -- off topic from {Falsifying a young Universe}
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5546 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 192 of 205 (313477)
05-19-2006 9:09 AM 		Reply to: Message 191 by Son Goku
05-19-2006 8:59 AM

6 Microns?
I'm curious about where does the 6 microns quote come from.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by Son Goku, posted 05-19-2006 8:59 AM Son Goku has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by Son Goku, posted 05-19-2006 12:13 PM fallacycop has replied
  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5546 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 195 of 205 (313533)
05-19-2006 12:35 PM 		Reply to: Message 193 by Son Goku
05-19-2006 12:13 PM

Re: 6 Microns?
Interesting. I would've expected a paper like that to be published in hep-exp instead...
This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by Son Goku, posted 05-19-2006 12:13 PM Son Goku has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 197 by cavediver, posted 05-19-2006 12:45 PM fallacycop has replied
  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5546 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 196 of 205 (313536)
05-19-2006 12:38 PM 		Reply to: Message 194 by cavediver
05-19-2006 12:26 PM

entanglement
Hello cavediver, are you planning on moving the quantum entanglement thread ahead? I'd hate to see such a thread die. Modulous seems to be interested.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by cavediver, posted 05-19-2006 12:26 PM cavediver has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 198 by cavediver, posted 05-19-2006 12:49 PM fallacycop has replied
  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5546 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 199 of 205 (313542)
05-19-2006 12:51 PM 		Reply to: Message 197 by cavediver
05-19-2006 12:45 PM

HEP
hep-exp, hep-ph... it's all the same.
I don't think I agree with that. I never made a real experiment in my life,
but that did not keep me from publishing in hep-ph
This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by cavediver, posted 05-19-2006 12:45 PM cavediver has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by cavediver, posted 05-19-2006 1:11 PM fallacycop has not replied
  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5546 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 200 of 205 (313543)
05-19-2006 12:54 PM 		Reply to: Message 198 by cavediver
05-19-2006 12:49 PM

Re: entanglement
We can do but I'm not sure what's left to do. I was thinking about going through the maths. We could look at some quantum computation but it's not really my forte.
Actually, Mermin has another intersting point that I may try to present, if I get time, which touches on the more philosophical aspects of QM.
​
And I guess we could look at some particle-statistics weirdness.
I'm fine with all of the above. But I don't think that either modulous or even less RAZD are ready for it just yet. we still have to walk them through the quantum entanglement, if the thread is to be of any use for them.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by cavediver, posted 05-19-2006 12:49 PM cavediver has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 202 by RAZD, posted 05-20-2006 10:02 PM fallacycop has replied
  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5546 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006

Normal Thread Display
Message 203 of 205 (314056)
05-21-2006 12:03 AM 		Reply to: Message 202 by RAZD
05-20-2006 10:02 PM

Apologies
fallacycop writes:
​
... or even less RAZD are ready for it just yet.
RAZD writes:
​
Thanks for the dripping condescension while avoiding dealing with the issue.
Sorry if I came across as snobish. I meant no offense. QM can be counterintuitive and it takes some maturing time to really understand how it works. I really enjoy helpping people understand the theory. I'm not posting just to get a self-satisfaction of "winning" a debate or anything like that.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by RAZD, posted 05-20-2006 10:02 PM RAZD has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by RAZD, posted 05-21-2006 12:22 AM fallacycop has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024