|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Why Atheists don't believe | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
This post is long, so grab a beer and enjoy the read
here's the rub, it is invariably an entirely subjective, internal event. Agreed, at least until one of us sees a bonafied miracle, where there is no chance of subjectivity. I have heard of one from a good friend, but I have yet to see the paper work on it.
A third person observing this moment (or moments) would not have witnessed anything at all. Yes, I understand your point, but there are instances where I have seen the whole room filled with people, and the spirit started moving, and everyone was on the floor, even by-standers who weren't even paying attention to what was going on. Then a whole bunch of people were converted at the same time. I have witnessed, and been a part of some other unexplainable stuff, that I have gone over in this forum before.
no two testimonies are identical in the details. Possibly because no 2 people are alike.
Moslems don't appear to have the same conversion experiences as Christians (from my admitted very limited sampling). I know little about it. When I ask my leaders about it, they say that it is an imitation from the devil. I am not usually happy with that answer, because I can't prove it.
Atheists appear to have a higher standard of required evidence on this particular topic. In my opinion, this standard derives from where we set the bar. Yes, I thought that way too. Good point about the little "c" and big "C". I understand that what is not all that important, you can believe by faith that it is true, but if you had to bet money on it, you know that even the little "c" you would need evidence for. This seems to be a general way of thinking for atheists, that was the claim I made in another thread, that atheists really don't believe anything, and that is what spawned this thread.
In any case, it is an invulnerable claim that would be impossible to evaluate one way or the other. On the other hand, I feel I am justified in questioning the conclusion you reached based on that experience. You are, in fact, making a big "C" claim when you attribute the experience to a deity - the claim being related to the existence of such an entity. If there is any commonality among atheists, it probably boils down to that one claim. A claim we evaluate as being highly unlikely in the absence of any confirmatory evidence. Well, it is not impossible to evaluate, if you knew me. There was a change that took place. People around me noticed a even a physical change. Everyone said I looked ten years younger, except for one guy, who said I wasn't me, but I was my son. (I'm my own grandpa?) You can ask me any questions about it you wish, I am more than happy to answer. It is way to much to go over in this thread perhaps, but let me ask you, just how much subjective evidence towards one thing does it take to start to become objective? Maybe never, but if you started to factor odds in, the odds would be very slim, that it wasn't God. Also, if I say "I love you" that statement is subjective, but is it only subjective to you, or is it subjective to me also? I mean I know what I feel, so to me it's objective. Which brings me to this. If I told you 2+2=4, you would know that it is true. Knowing something is true, is a feeling. I guess if we ponder it enough, there is the possibility that 2+2 does not =4, but the feeling of truth is still there. Well times that feeling of truth you had about that statement by a factor of 1000, and you start to get the idea of the feeling I had. It was then I instantly understood what is meant when they refer to the Holy Spirit as the spirit of truth. Like John said, when you know the truth, it will set you free. And it did. There was other feelings involved too. I felt the gifts of the Holy Spirit in me, and instantly I was wiser, and more sensitive to my surroundings, and peoples spirits. I instantly wanted to forgive everyone that ever hurt me, because I knew it didn't matter anymore, God would take care of it. (I only have a handful of people that I needed to forgive, because by nature I am a forgiving person) I just found a letter that I wrote about an experience I had shortly after, I will let you guys read it. I wrote it over 2 years ago, just around Easter.
quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
If she claimed to have met Jesus As much as I want everyone to meet Jesus, I don't wish that scenerio on you. Some of the people closest to me in my life, did not understamd what I went through, but as I explain it to them, they are starting to understand. Plus I made it a point not to change who I was in their lives, but to make it better, by loving more. Last thing I want to be is all Holy, holy, Mr. righteous. In trying to do this, you get a clear picture of the struggle between good and evil, and your mind is a battle field. But if you turn to the Lord for answers, it all works out.
Yes, I have no reason to believe you are a liar. I do not however believe that your experience is caused by anything "supernatural", an extaordinary claim like that needs extraordinary support. Thanks for believing It wouldn't need support from another believer But even that is subjective.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
Means nothing - I've convinced people there are ghosts in the room, done cold readings etc - people are sadly easy to fool. We had a show here recently where a fella called Darren Brown went to the states and got people to believe just what you describe - he did it to show how easy it is to get people to buy into such concepts. Yes, I know that. You don't know me, but I do not fall into that category, you'll have to take my word on it. That is why I humble myself, and say it was either the day I went crazy, or the day I met God. The most important thing about my experience with God, was that it happened when I was by myself.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
It's a shame your church leaders can't understand that. Ever thought of finding a more open-minded church? I wouldn't say it's all the leaders, but I have heard that answer. As far as open minded churches, I would say this one ranks high up there. Where else can you go and see your Pastor ride his harley into the church and arounf the congregation for a small group kick-off on Sunday morning, while we play born to be wild?
Given you know your own faith is subjective and dear to you. You must see that a Muslim's faith is just as subjective and dear to him? I can't really speak for muslims and their faith. The ones I know are pretty cool about their faith, and not all that religious anyway. Even the hasidic jews I know and work for, we have conversations about faith and God. What I find is that dealing with someone you would think is an ok person, you find someone, no matter the religion, even if they are atheist, are people that follow their hearts. Of course there is always some residual dogma, even for an atheist (atheistic dogma, lol) and I have found people like this to be more "Christian" than most Christians. This only confirms to me what Jesus did for us, the vail being torn, and the temple is us now. Doesn't matter what label we have on the outside, but what is inside our hearts is what matters. God is there, whether you recognize Him or not. We are by-products of our surroundings, and how can christianity have a chance when there are so many untrue Christians. People in this forum will cite this and that about Christianity, but rarely have anything to say about Jesus directly. Usually if they do, it is easy to tell how confused they are about it, and it's really hatred towards the churches, and not Jesus Himself. An interesting statistic, if all the church members in the US tithed, there would be enough money to feed alll the starving people in the US, and have a surplus. So where does that leave us? Maybe someone like you is more Christian than me, but you don't know it? My Pastor agrees with me, but won't say it out loud to everyone, because some people just won't get it, and think he is a heritic. In short, it's about your heart. Maybe when God looks down at us, he doesn't even see all the religions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
This is quite simply incorcect. Are you sure, or did you take what I meant out of context? They are both subjective feelings to others, but not to yourself. If your going to start making exact comparisons like that, then you have a lot of work to do, and many statements to correct from everyone here.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
I guess I come down on the side of "never". On the other hand, given a large enough sample, we can come up with a statistics that would allow us to predict a distribution of responses around a mean. What about the bible? It gives instruction on how to "meet" God. They seem to have worked for me, and enlightened me enough so that I can see clearly to the truth. Did I mention also that in an instant, I understood about 80% more of the bible, once I felt what I believe to be the Holy Spirit? Everything became so clear.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
Thanks
Peace and love.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
Brenna, I am working on it.
I have been placed in a church, and allowed to become part of the leadership for a reason. The church recognizes that the way church has always been done, is not working anymore. People are smart these days, and probably more in touch with the temple that is them. We are an experience generation, and people want to feel something real. If Jesus os truth, and our bodies a temple, then no matter what, there will always be a way to get in touch with that truth. I am working with the Pastors son, a youth pastor, and we are trying to change things, but it is dangerous groun, operating in a "forerunner" spirit. But in order for the church to work, then it must be relavent to todays world, and it must love, and be part of the community. Forget about the one Holy man with all the answer, we are in this together, and we all have much to learn. Thanks for helping me learn sometimes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
When my boss says that we need five more pizzas made, I make them, I don't go to check if we are actually out of pizzas; I just do it. Well that really has nothing to do with evidence does it? I can say with authority that, yes, a good percentage of atheist do not believe in stuff without evidence, at least of some sort.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
they would be unable to function in the real world. The real world is just that....real.
Let's take a simple example - when my significant other says she is going off to work - how do I know she is? she could be off meeting another boyfriend? Based on the evidence, this is a perfectly viable thing to believe in. You have collected enough evidence in your life about the "real world", and your loved one to have no reason to doubt her. Your belief that she is going to do what she says she is doing is based on evidence, both objective, and subjective, not 100% faith. If things were not adding up, her coming home late, weird phone calls, then based on that evidence, you might doubt her. Either way, it's all based on evidence, and the real world, and not some fantasy myth.
If someone tells me they went on holiday to Spain - what evidence do I have besides their word? Why am I likely to doubt them? Based on the evidence of the conversation, you can choose to doubt them or not. If put on the stand about the conversation, your logical answer would be that I was told by so and so, that he went on a vacation to Spain. I have no reason to doubt him, but I have no evidence that he did go there. That is a perfectly viable assumption about the trip, and it's all based on the evidence. You believe with 100% certainty that the conversation happened, but you do not believe with 100% certainty that he actually went. This only matters when it affects you, and you are asked what your honest assessment of the situation is. You would never say I believe with 100% faith that he went, would you?
If I eat out and they tell me the chicken is an organic chicken - what evidence do I have besides them telling me that? Am I going to leap up and ask to inspect the kitchens, take blood/cell samples? No of course I am not! Given todays world (or any other day) why would you believe with 100% certainty that the chicken was organic. Even I do not look at the chicken and say it's organic with 100% certainty. I say I hope it is what they say it is. It's like the fortune in a fortune cookie that says, that wasn't chiken.
An even more simple example - if I ask someone for directions and they give them to me, a normal person does not suddenly demand proof or evidence that the directions are correct. Then you've never been to Puerto Rico. I have never received proper direction from anyone there. It seems to be a joke to send people in the completely wrong direction. Either that or there is too much pride to actually admit something they don't know. Either way, your saying that you believe the directions that were given to you are 100% correct? Will you drive away from that person knowing 100% that you will arrive at the proper destination? OR will you be driving with an uncertainty, and hoping that person wasn't a flake and sent you 20 mins. out of your way? Or are you going to just try them out to see where it takes you, because at the moment you have no other choice. If you arrive in the proper place, then you can say, hey that person was right. You present all these cases that lead me to believe you are the kind of person that takes many things on faith. But not God, because it is just so ridiculus, and far fetched. But I am sure that if I questioned you, or if you were put on the stand, then the truth of your experience will come out. The truth is what matters or not. The truth of what you actually believe in will come out, especially in a debate here. The point is, there is no reason to question any of this stuff, because it just doesn't matter. That doesn't mean you believe it with 100% certainty. This is the exact reason I continue to question my faith, the church, and the people that go there. There are aspects of my faith that I do believe with 100% certainty, solely based on faith, and it matters in my life, because it gives my life direction. I am not waiting to see where it is going to take me, I already know where I am going. Unlike the person who gave you directions, I am sure you would drive away from them and say, I hope I am going in the right direction. I am not sure where everyone else is going, and I do not believe anything anyone tells me about where others are going. I am just hoping and asking God all the time, that everyone will go to heaven, and all will be revealed to them, and then we all can have a big party one day.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
You may have the feeling of a gods existance but this does not make it so. If it was just a feeling, I would doubt it more. I was only giving one example of what drives my faith. There are many more aspects of it, right here in this thread.
If there is a lot of correcting for me to do, please point them out and I will happili correct them for you. I am not sure what you mean by that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
Which part of this statement has to do with evidence?
quote: The part that his boss says He needs 5 pizzas?Or the part were the boss says he is out of pizzas? We are assuming that the boss needs 5 pizzas because he is actually out of them, based on the statement.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
* I take many things on faith and my previous experience in that context and with that person. * The more complex and important an issue to me the more likely I am going to search out addition evidence or information. Those 2 statements conflict with each other. Why do you need addtional evidence if you already take it on faith? Maybe it is because you really don't believe it 100%.
The concept of Gods is not that important to me I am not sure I believe that.
I find no evidence of their existance or any reason to take their existance on faith. I do believe that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
RickJB writes:
The analogy doesn't hold, CK. Even if you don't know where your girlfriend is, you CAN find out empirically. You can follow her and see where she goes. You can even take someone with you to confirm what you see. There's your evidence. When it comes to the existence of God, however, no such option is open to you. You are equating a lack of evidence with the ability to get it. When we say "lack of evidence" we mean that there is NO means of empirical confirmation. Well put. I agree. That's the difference. CK writes:
The point is - I could go and get evidence but I don't - I take it on faith. All of us take multiple things on faith every day without requiring "evidence" from the people we interact with. ALmost another contradictory statement. You don't get evidence...why?Still, there is no denying that the evidence can be easily optained, and IS part of the equation. Nosy writes:
Thinking that the 2 statements are contradictory reflects a non-black and white approach. They are not contradictory at all. He may take one thing totally on trust (we should define terms more carefully) based on how important it is or the context or the source person. He may be utterly sceptical of something else based on the same things. He may also take something as pretty sure but do a bit of checking for other things. He is saying very clearly with those statements that he doesn't believe many, many things 100% but believes them well enough to act as it they are 100%. This is about the only confusing thing I ever read from you. I think what you are trying to say is that there are different levels of subject matter in life, and some require authentication, and some don't, they can be taken on faith. But that is not entirely true, as the evidence can be had if needed, so it is not on faith alone. If you believe something, you either believe it, or you don't. Most of the time, we aren't going to analize things to that depth, because it isn't required for day to day living. Your right about trust. schraf writes
But we could check for the evidence that he needs them. I agree. Invictus writes:
Like CK has said, though, it is really a case-by-case sort of thing. You can't group all the events in someone's life into one big pot as if they are all the same and hold an equal amount of importance. I agree on the case by case. I think I should have limited it to things that really matter, and better defined the question.
Why can you say that? What is this "authority" you are talking about? And what do you mean by "stuff"? In this case, I am very much unwilling to believe you based on just what you've said. I want some evidence in support. Trék The authority comes from them, not me. Just read the responses, and draw your own conclusion. But your right about the word "stuff." It is a blurry definition.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
What does all that have to do with the price of gas?
We are not trying to convince atheists that there is a God in this thread.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024