quote:
True, that is why there is not evidence of man on earth more that about 6000 years ago. No buildings, no temples, no utensils!
Well, that's not strictly true, is it.
We have the cave paintings at Lascaux (along with a variety of artifacts found in there too) dated to around 30,000 years old,
http://www.culture.fr/culture/arcnat/lascaux/en/
In fact, if you like paleolithic art and constructions, here's a good site:
http://witcombe.sbc.edu/ARTHprehistoric.html#paleolithic
So, what'll it be: Are these sites all incorrectly dated, are they fakes, or is it possible that mankind is a wee bit older than 6000 years? Inquiring minds want to know.