Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,819 Year: 3,076/9,624 Month: 921/1,588 Week: 104/223 Day: 2/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creative day
Weyland
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 19 (31506)
02-06-2003 7:58 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by steppjr
09-05-2002 2:38 PM


quote:
True, that is why there is not evidence of man on earth more that about 6000 years ago. No buildings, no temples, no utensils!
Well, that's not strictly true, is it.
We have the cave paintings at Lascaux (along with a variety of artifacts found in there too) dated to around 30,000 years old,
http://www.culture.fr/culture/arcnat/lascaux/en/
In fact, if you like paleolithic art and constructions, here's a good site:
http://witcombe.sbc.edu/ARTHprehistoric.html#paleolithic
So, what'll it be: Are these sites all incorrectly dated, are they fakes, or is it possible that mankind is a wee bit older than 6000 years? Inquiring minds want to know.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by steppjr, posted 09-05-2002 2:38 PM steppjr has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Spud, posted 05-14-2003 7:12 AM Weyland has not replied
 Message 9 by Dr Cresswell, posted 05-14-2003 2:14 PM Weyland has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024