|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution Sequel | |||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
This is the place to comment on moderation procedures.
Added by edit by Adminnemooseus - The following are the previous "General discussion of moderation procedures" topics, in order or origin:
Change in Moderation?General discussion of moderation procedures General discussion of moderation procedures: The Sequel General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consecution General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
Did you call someone a liar?
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
Did you call someone a liar?
If you did, then it is not a matter of viewpoint, or even if the allegation is true. It does not matter what the viewpoint of any poster might be, or any Admin. If you called someone a liar you should be suspended. That is all that is relevant. Did you call someone a liar? Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
Did you call another member a liar?
So far you have avoided answering that simple question. Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
Restoring your posting pivs in Coffeehouse.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
You know better than to call a member a liar. Particularly another Fundamentalist just like you and Gene Scott. Or is this just another of your ploys in the hopes we'd forget that paper you promised us in April?
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
This is NOT a debating thread. Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
Not the place Robin. This is to discuss moderation procedures, not your shortcomings.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
If you wish to discuss your shortcomings start a coffeehouse thread. Remember there is a 300 post limit but continuation threads are possible if you need them.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
No easy way yet. Maybe in the next version of the software.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
Sorry, but for his sake I don't believe I should go into that. I hope that he will learn from this experience. I too hope that when he does return, or continues his life, he will remain on the right track.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
To make a firm impression, as of a mountain falling on him.
AbE: I will say that this was not the first warning, or even the first sanction. Lesser sanctions had been tried and were not working. Edited by AdminJar, : No reason given. Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
Several reasons. First, the newer software only addressed the member databases, message have not yet been moved over to a formal dB. Second is simply the issue of content. Generaly by the 300 or so post count the thread has either bogged down or taken a new direction. Halting the old gives the opportunity to rethink and refocus the topic.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
See Message 15
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminJar Inactive Member |
In your reasoning for closing the thread you mentioned that the thread was pointless whereas a point was most certainly given. Could you comment on how a thread with an express point can be labelled pointless? While there might have been some merit in your intial message, the thread rapidly degenerated into folk telling you why they thought it was not a great idea and your response noting their absence from somewhaere. There may have been merit in the OP but the thread was as pointless as any I have ever seen. And yes, it will quickly fall off the first page. The fact that you missed my message was yet another indicator of why the thread was going nowhere. The balance of the thread is folk saying that it is a bad idea and you responding with your message of absence. They were coming so fast that my closing message got passed like it was standing still.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024