Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,481 Year: 3,738/9,624 Month: 609/974 Week: 222/276 Day: 62/34 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What are you? EvC poll
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5871 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 121 of 126 (317323)
06-03-2006 6:54 PM
Reply to: Message 120 by Shh
06-03-2006 11:32 AM


Re: emergent properties
------Like "mind", "information" is an emergent property of material systems.------
Material systems are 'systems' because of the 'information' (physical laws and cosmological constants)that systematize them. They do not systematize themselves. The universe as a system is in a state of entropy. And entropy is '+'increasing (2nd law of thermodynamics).
If the system has evolved as you must necessarily presuppose with your 'interpretation' of the information, then the system would be less sytematized (ordered) in the past, because of the '-'decrease in entropy.
An entropic system (such as ours)cannot have been less ordered (systematized)in the past. In the past, entropy decreases not increases, and we would see '+' more order (systemization). Our world is coming apart, not coming together.
Before something can come apart, it must start out together or, 'whole' (the root word for Holy).
------Or rather, "information" is the name given to the abstract concept which is correspondent, to an emergent property of material objects within a system, which may affect the operation of the system.(I think)------
Thinking is good. We should keep thinking very carefully... Information is correspondant to the information that -is- 'the emergent property.' We recognize an objective pattern, because it corrosponds to what we already know. You, like 'nwr', are making the intelligent design case in the same manner as the boys from the Discovery Institute. You should have actually listened to what they were saying.
------There's no point in looking to the DI for understanding of materialist or naturalist philosophies they don't understand them, nor do they want to.------
Nobody understands materialist or naturalist philosophies because they are not understandable (i.e. nobody can understand why 2+2=7). The most notable examples are the materialist and naturalist philosophers themselves. The concepts are an abstraction, not a coherent philosophy (truth). They are a wishes, but not facts.
------Much of "reality" contains such, if they were a problem for naturalist/materialist/mechanist philosophies, then these philosophies would have been forgotten long ago.------
They are not forgotton, because to move beyond them requires a man to acknowledge God. To acknowledge God, means to look in the mirror and see the truth! They do not want the truth, they want to keep their sin. they don't need God, because they are God by implication.
------On the other hand if you're a Dualist, can you point out a single example of the second component of reeality? Matter and energy are one thing, what else is there?------
The logical and reasonable Holy Spirit of God. Matthew 12:31
"And so I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven."
------(Please don't say mind, it's already included as a property of matter, and unless there's reason to believe otherwise I (for one) won't.)------
I didn't say mind, I said Spirit. It's not mind and matter. It's mind matter (body), and Spirit. The Spirit is the missing link! The link that contains the answer to the 'information' that is the origin of 'wholeness', that we are now deteriorating from.
Isaiah 1:18
"Come now, let us reason together," says the Lord. "Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool."
Keep thinking and play for keeps, Rob
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Off Topic Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Shh, posted 06-03-2006 11:32 AM Shh has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by AdminPD, posted 06-05-2006 7:04 AM Rob has not replied

  
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 122 of 126 (317830)
06-05-2006 7:04 AM
Reply to: Message 121 by Rob
06-03-2006 6:54 PM


Warning - Off Topic
Welcome To EvC Rob,
Your post is off topic for this thread. Please do not continue this line of discussion.
Since you are new to this board, I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the functions of EvC by using the Practice Makes Perfect Forum.
quote:
It is easier to differentiate your comments from your opponents by putting theirs in a quote box, such as this one.
I also strongly suggest you read the Forum Guidelines. Specifically 1, 2, and 10. Staying on topic and arguing the position not the person are very important here at EvC.
In the purple signature box below, you'll find some links that will help make your journey here pleasant.
Pay particular attention to our Forum Guidelines and all will go well.
Please direct any comments concerning this Admin msg to the Moderation Thread.
Again welcome and happy debating. Purple

Usually, in a well-conducted debate, speakers are either emotionally uncommitted or can preserve sufficient detachment to maintain a coolly academic approach.-- Encylopedia Brittanica, on debate

Links for comments on moderation procedures and/or responding to admin msgs:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures
  • Thread Reopen Requests
  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
    Helpful links for New Members:
    Forum Guidelines, [thread=-19,-112], and [thread=-17,-45]

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 121 by Rob, posted 06-03-2006 6:54 PM Rob has not replied

      
    Larni
    Member
    Posts: 4000
    From: Liverpool
    Joined: 09-16-2005


    Message 123 of 126 (317838)
    06-05-2006 7:48 AM
    Reply to: Message 103 by Rob
    06-02-2006 10:30 PM


    Information.
    Information needs a substrate to exist.
    Information is a property of ordered energy and matter.
    You also need a brain to analyse the information to make it meaningful.
    If every conscious creature in the universe spontaneously died alll the 'information' in the universe would become 'data'.
    OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
    AdminPD
    Edited by AdminPD, : Off Topic Warning

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 103 by Rob, posted 06-02-2006 10:30 PM Rob has not replied

      
    1.61803
    Member (Idle past 1526 days)
    Posts: 2928
    From: Lone Star State USA
    Joined: 02-19-2004


    Message 124 of 126 (318410)
    06-06-2006 6:07 PM
    Reply to: Message 98 by iano
    06-02-2006 8:21 AM


    Re: Poll update
    monist 16
    Phi rickJB Larni RandyFeagley
    Scharfinator Buzzsaw Shh
    BrennaKimi Iano BradMcfall
    Omnivorous Chronos Lfen
    EZscience Malachi Mr. Jack
    Dualist 4
    Phatboy
    Truth Lover
    Riverrat
    Catholic Scientist
    Undecided
    Robrohan
    NWR

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 98 by iano, posted 06-02-2006 8:21 AM iano has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 126 by Coragyps, posted 06-08-2006 10:41 PM 1.61803 has not replied

      
    The Tiger
    Inactive Member


    Message 125 of 126 (319353)
    06-08-2006 10:29 PM


    I'm a dualist for the following reasons:
    Many top physicists and other scientists have theorized and concluded and even have evidence that there are other "dimensions" to our universe, more than just 3 or 4.
    Vast numbers of people (including me) have had speritual experiences with "entities" that
    could be called speritual (Ghosts, demons, sperits, whatever you want to call them).
    Near Death Experiences
    Also, there's many scientists who are very religious and believei n the supernatural and speritual so there's some qualitative evidence.

      
    Coragyps
    Member (Idle past 756 days)
    Posts: 5553
    From: Snyder, Texas, USA
    Joined: 11-12-2002


    Message 126 of 126 (319365)
    06-08-2006 10:41 PM
    Reply to: Message 124 by 1.61803
    06-06-2006 6:07 PM


    Re: Poll update
    You missed my very short "monist" post. But I'll get over it.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 124 by 1.61803, posted 06-06-2006 6:07 PM 1.61803 has not replied

      
    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024