Evolution Logic

Sure it does. The transitional forms are the families, taxons, creatures etc that you refer to - the ones that appear suddenly.Why wouldn't the transitional forms appear suddenly? You say those two things like they're mutually inconsistent.

The same thing that makes me sure that conodonts didn't live with diatoms, or eurypterids with crabs, or mososaurs with whales, or placoderms with pleisiosaurs: there's never been fossils of the first of each pair found in the same rock with one of the last of each pair. The firsts were all extinct before the seconds evolved.Fusilinids and rudists.
Dicynodonts and crocodiles.
Dinosaurs with grass. Rugose with scleratinian corals.
A paleontologist could go on all night. This is how the Christian parson/geologists of the early 1800's figured out that the Earth is very old and that Noah's Flood wasn't. They looked at the rocks.

I think you meant "fish have remained fish."But, yeah. Here's the thing - there's more different breeds of dogs now than before. There's more different species of monkey now than before. There's more families of fish now than before.There's more different kinds of mammals now than before. More different kinds of plants. More different kinds of everything. That's the definition, and proof, of evolution. Evolution is not one organism changing into another. It's populations of species giving rise to new species. "Mammal" used to encompass a single species. Now it encompasses thousands. There used to be one kind of insect. Now there are millions.That's evolution. And when we see new species arise, even now, that's observing evolution in action.And you still haven't answered my question. Instead, you're reasoning circularly - your proof that evolution can't happen is because there's this barrier. But your proof that the barrier exists is your assertion that evolution can't happen.

I referred you to chickens with feathers on their legs, where their ancestors had scales/scutes/? in that position. There ya go.

I have already said, you keep ignoring it. I'm not going to post it hundreds of times. Please check back, I already said. Do you even know what I was talking about there? Or did you just go through and pick and choose at random without having a clue what I was talking about and to what I was replying? The total effect is progressive, a cell evolving into a human. Sure, according to your beliefs it may have gone down and up, but the total effect is what I see, and it could only have come by through serious progression, this doesn't mean it couldn't go down at times.

---

"If you’re living like there is no God you’d better be right!" - Unknown

No, it is supported by facts, but I won't mention them here. Perhaps I will go to those forums you mentioned a little later and support this claim.

---

"If you’re living like there is no God you’d better be right!" - Unknown

I wasn't making any assertions. I was pointing out how I could use the same reasoning an evolutionist used to put down AIG, to put down TO. It's a claim that can be flipped around right back at the person who used it.

---

"If you’re living like there is no God you’d better be right!" - Unknown

I did just like you told me to, and when I clicked on PDF, it didn't work, again. I think it's a dead link. Did it work with you?

---

"If you’re living like there is no God you’d better be right!" - Unknown

Hey, I provided my back up, just recently. So now you provide your's.

---

"If you’re living like there is no God you’d better be right!" - Unknown

the link works both ways down here. And I'm even further down the line than you.

Ok, here, you can go to my essay that I wrote, on my site, and read my essay, there I have my support for my claim about mutations not being able to do the job, as well as support for many of my other claims: Page Not Found - Webs

---

"If you’re living like there is no God you’d better be right!" - Unknown

Those are not the transitional forms.Transitional forms are just that TRANSITIONAL, so they cannot just "appear." And neither can any fully developed forms, they can't just pop up from nothing, if you believe in evolution. Of course, you could deny it any day, I'll be more than happy to hear that...

---

"If you’re living like there is no God you’d better be right!" - Unknown

Have you considered that the geologic layers could have been layed down by a universal flood? Not by millions of years?

---

"If you’re living like there is no God you’d better be right!" - Unknown

Yup. I try to always check. Must be one o' them "different 'puter" things.

Yes, I have, as did those geologists. Not just the fossils, but the nature of the rocks themselves, are incompatible with Fluds and short timespans.We can take this to the Geology and the Great Flood forum if you want to learn more.