Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution Sequel
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 16 of 302 (292326)
03-05-2006 10:06 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Admin
03-03-2006 2:03 PM


Re: Unfair to Crashfrog?
Crash's posts range from the trivial, the off-topic and the inappriately acerbic to the brilliant. My guess is that he's paying for past sins.
I posted out of anger so I had no objection to the suspension. Thanks, Dan, for sticking up for me. Hopefully it puts Tal under the glass a little bit more.
Guess I need to try to stick more to the "brilliant" end, or failing that, "appropriately acerbic." Not getting involved with discussions with Holmes would probably be the beginning of that.
This message has been edited by crashfrog, 03-05-2006 10:07 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Admin, posted 03-03-2006 2:03 PM Admin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by nator, posted 03-26-2006 8:24 PM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 160 of 302 (304532)
04-16-2006 1:09 AM


I realize that locking great debate topics down to the stated participants is in the works, but before then, can something be done to make them a little more apparent from inside? I almost always view messages via "All Topics" and the Great Debate topics simply don't stand out from the 20-odd other forum categories.
A new color scheme, maybe? Anything to indicate that the thread one is looking at is a Great Debate topic. I realize that maybe I'm the only one dumb enough to be accidentally posting in them, but it's simply because there's no indication that it's a great debate topic when one is reading the last few most recent messages in it.

Replies to this message:
 Message 161 by Adminnemooseus, posted 04-16-2006 1:44 AM crashfrog has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 163 of 302 (304586)
04-16-2006 10:26 AM
Reply to: Message 161 by Adminnemooseus
04-16-2006 1:44 AM


Re: The "Great Debate" indicators are pretty obvious
Topic title: How do we know about natural selection? (Igor and Lithodid-Man only)
I'm sorry but the title of any topic is far from obvious, especially when the link is taking you to the most recent message. The title is there when you compose a message, but so is a lot of other garbage, and it just gets filtered out when one is concentrating on writing a post.
Isn't the "(Igor and Lithodid-Man only)" part a pretty good clue that you shouldn't be posting there, even if you somehow don't notice the "The Great Debate" at the All Topic page?
Look, I'm not saying it's not a stupid mistake, but all I'm suggesting is a quick change to the stylesheet. The indicators at present are insufficient - Great Debate topics are rare, and they look exactly like every other thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by Adminnemooseus, posted 04-16-2006 1:44 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by Ben!, posted 04-16-2006 8:31 PM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1487 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 301 of 302 (320531)
06-11-2006 2:21 PM
Reply to: Message 299 by iano
06-11-2006 2:09 PM


Re: PEH closed
My comment: "your absence from the relevant thread" dealt with the objection that 3 posters made which simply denigrated John an/or his argument. That their comments are hollow is made manifest from their unwillingness to put their convictions to the test. Did one of them even attempt to gain entry to the Showcase PEH thread?
What would be the purpose of that? Davidson's ideas were put to the test, before you got here, and they failed. Open and shut.
Why should I bother to beg access to a limited thread just to satisfy your curiosity? If you want to read the refutations of the semi-meiotic "hypothesis", search the archives. None of the rest of us are under any obligation to revisit the past simply to assuage your curiosity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 299 by iano, posted 06-11-2006 2:09 PM iano has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024