Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (8905 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 04-24-2019 2:03 AM
25 online now:
Dredge, dwise1, PaulK, Pressie (4 members, 21 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: WookieeB
Post Volume:
Total: 850,135 Year: 5,172/19,786 Month: 1,294/873 Week: 190/460 Day: 6/29 Hour: 0/6

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution Sequel
Inactive Member

Message 301 of 302 (320531)
06-11-2006 2:21 PM
Reply to: Message 299 by iano
06-11-2006 2:09 PM

Re: PEH closed
My comment: "your absence from the relevant thread" dealt with the objection that 3 posters made which simply denigrated John an/or his argument. That their comments are hollow is made manifest from their unwillingness to put their convictions to the test. Did one of them even attempt to gain entry to the Showcase PEH thread?

What would be the purpose of that? Davidson's ideas were put to the test, before you got here, and they failed. Open and shut.

Why should I bother to beg access to a limited thread just to satisfy your curiosity? If you want to read the refutations of the semi-meiotic "hypothesis", search the archives. None of the rest of us are under any obligation to revisit the past simply to assuage your curiosity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 299 by iano, posted 06-11-2006 2:09 PM iano has not yet responded

Posts: 3879
Joined: 09-26-2002

Message 302 of 302 (320537)
06-11-2006 2:38 PM
Reply to: Message 300 by iano
06-11-2006 2:12 PM

Re: Calling Percy: PEH petition thread closed:
I'm not Percy/Admin, but I am the next longest term admin at .

I agree with AdminJar's reasons for closing the topic in question.

I also agree with Crashfrog's comments of message 301.

My impression is that you are now being nothing much more than a royal pain in the ass. Drop it and get over it. Everyone else also drop it.

This part 6 of the "General discussion of moderation procedures" has passed 300 messages and will now be closed. The new next version is General discussion of moderation procedures - Part 7.

The various admins need to update their "signatures" yet again.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 300 by iano, posted 06-11-2006 2:12 PM iano has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019