Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,411 Year: 3,668/9,624 Month: 539/974 Week: 152/276 Day: 26/23 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How do creationists explain stars?
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 61 of 297 (321080)
06-13-2006 11:04 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Rob
06-13-2006 10:46 AM


Re: RE Age of Stars
NKJ Isaiah 40:22 It is He who sits above the circle of the earth..." It was people who said the earth was flat, Not the word of God.
ROFL.
When did you last see a three-dimensional circle, Rob?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 10:46 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 11:24 AM Coragyps has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5870 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 62 of 297 (321085)
06-13-2006 11:24 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by Coragyps
06-13-2006 11:04 AM


Re: RE Age of Stars
When did you last see a three-dimensional circle, Rob?
Every time I see a sphere, how about you? Now for God who is omnipresent, I do not know how to even describe what such a perspective would be... I suspect he would relate in the simplest manner possible to us. That way, anyone could understand and at the same time, the arrogant could scoff...
The bible often refers to the four corners of the Earth, so I'm just noting that Isaiah didn't say that God sits above the 'square' of the earth. It's worth noting...
I confess that it is not proof, but it is not proof for either of us.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Coragyps, posted 06-13-2006 11:04 AM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Coragyps, posted 06-13-2006 11:32 AM Rob has replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 63 of 297 (321087)
06-13-2006 11:32 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by Rob
06-13-2006 11:24 AM


Re: RE Age of Stars
I suspect he would relate in the simplest manner possible to us.
And "circle" is simpler and less ambiguous than "ball."
Right.....
Matthew 4:8 - “Once again, the devil took him to a very high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in their glory.”
On a spherical Earth?
[/OT digression]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 11:24 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 12:23 PM Coragyps has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 415 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 64 of 297 (321095)
06-13-2006 11:56 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Rob
06-13-2006 10:46 AM


Truth is relative?
You guys really need to relax. I thought I did a great job of explaining that this whole exercise is just speculation. Even so, you get so offended. Truth is relative remember? What's wrong with my truth? You have yours right?
Well, some conclusions are supported by evidence.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 10:46 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by Rob, posted 06-24-2006 2:51 AM jar has not replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5870 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 65 of 297 (321098)
06-13-2006 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by Coragyps
06-13-2006 11:32 AM


Re: RE Age of Stars
And "circle" is simpler and less ambiguous than "ball."
Right.....
Yep, you got it... A circle is not necesarily a ball, but a ball is always a circle. It depends on perspective...
Matthew 4:8 - “Once again, the devil took him to a very high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in their glory.”
If you ever go to that mountain you will understand. It's an experiential thing. Sorry for any lack of evidence...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by Coragyps, posted 06-13-2006 11:32 AM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by rgb, posted 06-13-2006 12:51 PM Rob has not replied
 Message 68 by Coragyps, posted 06-13-2006 12:56 PM Rob has replied

rgb
Inactive Member


Message 66 of 297 (321111)
06-13-2006 12:48 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Modulous
03-07-2006 4:37 AM


Re: Calculations are good
Fine, just change the mass and see what happens.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Modulous, posted 03-07-2006 4:37 AM Modulous has not replied

rgb
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 297 (321115)
06-13-2006 12:51 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Rob
06-13-2006 12:23 PM


Re: RE Age of Stars
Rob writes
quote:
If you ever go to that mountain you will understand. It's an experiential thing. Sorry for any lack of evidence...
I've been on the continental divide twice. What's your point?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 12:23 PM Rob has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 68 of 297 (321118)
06-13-2006 12:56 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Rob
06-13-2006 12:23 PM


Re: RE Age of Stars
Back to topic, Rob:
There is a galaxy, M33, that has been measured, by trigonometric methods, to be nearly eight hundred thousand parsecs away from us. That means that light from that galaxy takes about two million years to get here. "Exploding stars," novae, have been seen in M33. They must have gone nova about 2,000,000 years ago, or we couldn't see them yet. Their light wouldn't have reached us.
Did the creator fella create light from an event that didn't happen - because it would have happened 1,994,000 years before the "fourth day" in Genesis - just to fool us? Or what's going on? Can you explain that to me?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 12:23 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 3:23 PM Coragyps has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5870 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 69 of 297 (321166)
06-13-2006 3:23 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Coragyps
06-13-2006 12:56 PM


Re: RE Age of Stars
Did the creator fella create light from an event that didn't happen - because it would have happened 1,994,000 years before the "fourth day" in Genesis - just to fool us? Or what's going on? Can you explain that to me?
I don't know! But I think the concept of a fully formed universe is self explanatory.
I don't think God fools us per se'. I think we fool ourselves in believing we can prove anything.
And that's a remarkable thing when you think about it.
Like I said earlier, if I had to understand all this stuff to believe it, then I couldn't even believe I exist. But I have tremendous faith that I do, and that I am typing a reasonable response to your question.
We're not God, so why don't you ask Him some of these things?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Coragyps, posted 06-13-2006 12:56 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Mespo, posted 06-13-2006 4:18 PM Rob has replied
 Message 71 by Coragyps, posted 06-13-2006 4:41 PM Rob has replied
 Message 72 by Coragyps, posted 06-13-2006 4:43 PM Rob has replied
 Message 76 by rgb, posted 06-13-2006 6:57 PM Rob has not replied

Mespo
Member (Idle past 2906 days)
Posts: 158
From: Mesopotamia, Ohio, USA
Joined: 09-19-2002


Message 70 of 297 (321180)
06-13-2006 4:18 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Rob
06-13-2006 3:23 PM


I can agree with your concept, Rob
I don't know! But I think the concept of a fully formed universe is self explanatory
The CONCEPT makes sense. But then, if it were so, there would be no need for astronomers or physicists or a whole host of scientists who study the Heavens. Everything they've learned is wrong.
(:raig

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 3:23 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 5:54 PM Mespo has replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 71 of 297 (321187)
06-13-2006 4:41 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Rob
06-13-2006 3:23 PM


Re: RE Age of Stars
But I think the concept of a fully formed universe is self explanatory.
The concept of a fully-formed universe appearing that way a few thousands of years ago is utterly absurd, though. We have libraries full of data that show that all those galaxies out there are VERY OLD. All those stars that you can see at night are VERY OLD - half a million up to twelve billion years old. And the fact that we can see events whose light took millions or billions of years to reach us just eliminates the chance of an "appearance of age" universe unless Loki or Coyote is the God in Charge.
Surely the Christian God isn't the Author of Lies, eh?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 3:23 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 6:00 PM Coragyps has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 72 of 297 (321188)
06-13-2006 4:43 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Rob
06-13-2006 3:23 PM


Re: RE Age of Stars
We're not God, so why don't you ask Him some of these things?
He never picks up, and never calls back when I leave messages on His machine. You ask, and tell us what He says.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 3:23 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Rob, posted 06-13-2006 6:05 PM Coragyps has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5870 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 73 of 297 (321205)
06-13-2006 5:54 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Mespo
06-13-2006 4:18 PM


Re: I can agree with your concept, Rob
The CONCEPT makes sense. But then, if it were so, there would be no need for astronomers or physicists or a whole host of scientists who study the Heavens. Everything they've learned is wrong.
No not everything. In fact look at Galileo... the church wanted to cut his throat, but he was right. The sun rises the sun sets. It is true... Where we run into problems is in interpretation. The church seemed to think it meant that the Earth stood still. They were wrong.
Science can do the same thing. Consider Einsteins view:
...But science can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with the aspiration toward truth and understanding. This source of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion. To this there also belongs the faith in the possibility that the regulations valid for the world of existence are rational, that is, comprehensible to reason.
I cannot conceive of a genuine scientist without that profound faith. The situation may be expressed by an image: science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.
To me it is not the facts that are the problem, it is the lens by which we look at them.
The turning point in our lives is when we stop seeking the God we want and start seeking the God who is.
--- Patrick Morley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Mespo, posted 06-13-2006 4:18 PM Mespo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by Mespo, posted 06-14-2006 10:18 AM Rob has replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5870 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 74 of 297 (321211)
06-13-2006 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by Coragyps
06-13-2006 4:41 PM


Re: RE Age of Stars
The concept of a fully-formed universe appearing that way a few thousands of years ago is utterly absurd, though. We have libraries full of data that show that all those galaxies out there are VERY Old. All those stars that you can see at night are VERY OLD - half a million up to twelve billion years old. And the fact that we can see events whose light took millions or billions of years to reach us just eliminates the chance of an "appearance of age" universe unless Loki or Coyote is the God in Charge.
Surely the Christian God isn't the Author of Lies, eh?
Sorry man, I just don't see the problem when assuming God is omnipotent. That just so happens to be the character of the biblical God.
Anything is possible! We must keep an open mind.
You think you are too intelligent to believe in God. I am not like you.
--Napoleon Bonaparte

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Coragyps, posted 06-13-2006 4:41 PM Coragyps has not replied

Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5870 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 75 of 297 (321212)
06-13-2006 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Coragyps
06-13-2006 4:43 PM


Re: RE Age of Stars
He never picks up, and never calls back when I leave messages on His machine. You ask, and tell us what He says.
Touche'...
You have to talk to Him by His rules. First, you must give up your whole life and let Him spiritually possess you. He bought and paid for us. It's just too high a price for a lot of people and sounds really bizarre.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Coragyps, posted 06-13-2006 4:43 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Coragyps, posted 06-13-2006 7:38 PM Rob has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024