Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,850 Year: 4,107/9,624 Month: 978/974 Week: 305/286 Day: 26/40 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Opinions and conclusions about Religion and God.
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3955 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 106 of 280 (321533)
06-14-2006 5:09 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by riVeRraT
06-14-2006 8:09 AM


i'm more worried about my own worship rather than those of others. i don't care how dead a church is, i can't go if i don't feel what i'm saying. the problem is with what i feel.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by riVeRraT, posted 06-14-2006 8:09 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by riVeRraT, posted 06-15-2006 8:04 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
Rob 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5876 days)
Posts: 2297
Joined: 06-01-2006


Message 107 of 280 (321712)
06-15-2006 1:59 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by arachnophilia
06-14-2006 12:48 AM


Re: two old posts of mine
Well, I'm not going to respond with the kind of length your response is deserving of simply because of time pressure for me at the moment. Also, I don't think it is my place to convert anybody. I fully believe it is the Spirit that accomplishes that.
We are definitely at odds on some things. For instance, I personally find that John is the most revealing of the Gospels. However it is in Luke where we really get a picture of the hard line stuff that freaks people out. Anyone can tolerate a lovey dovey Jesus who was just another guy but with great genes. Very few are interested in what He really was, and that is God...
I strongly hear what the Apostle Paul is saying, and I don't dicount anything in scripture. I believe the whole Bible. That doesn't mean I can answer all of the very difficult questions that people raise. The details are unending.
I totally agree with you about some churches being false and victimizing people. The lifting of snakes is a perfect example. But I do understand it's proper interpretation:
The serpents are lies... demonic in origin. The poison is the wine(so to speak) of the false prophets. The christians job is to clear the bushes (the lies) and uproot them, all the while ingesting the deadly falsehoods and being unharmed, because they are so easy to see for the seeing. The goal is to give an unobstructed view of Christ.
There are any number of way to say the same thing as I just mixed metaphors in my interpretation. The Bible is full of metaphor like that, not to mention parables. It is like encryption. You need the code to understand it, and the code is the Spirit of God.
I find a lot of the Old Testament stories of battle and war, are direct examples of the spiritual war we face today. In those stories are tremendous lessons and confirmation and encouragement almost with a wink and a nod. In other words, the stories themselves seem to make no sense, but their true meaning is elsewhere. It is a supernatural experience to catch a glimpes of that revelation.
This is going to be too much for some, but it is the truth. I understood very little of the Bible beforehand. I only followed God's leading, and that was a confession on my part very simple and genuine like the thief on the cross. After being born again and in a very short time, it was as though the whole Bible was revealed to me as one grid. Not a lot of details, I just understood it. Very difficult to explain and not very logical. Just Divine revelation! I was blind but now I see.
There is only one requirement to know God. That's one of the many things that made Jesus unique... So many today preach (falsely) that we cannot know the truth. Jesus said flatly you will know the truth. And the requirement is to give over total control of your life to him. Then he will enter and you will see. It is not easy...
when you are born of the Spirit that wrote it, you quickly begin to see why it is called the living Bible in many quarters, and how the false gospels were seen for what they were... Christianity is not a religion. It is reality! It's not about belief, it is about the blind having their sight restored.
Faith? yes!... but not at all blind.
That is my story and I'm sticking to it, not to mention I'm rambling and trying to rush...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by arachnophilia, posted 06-14-2006 12:48 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by arachnophilia, posted 06-15-2006 3:14 AM Rob has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 108 of 280 (321728)
06-15-2006 3:14 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by Rob
06-15-2006 1:59 AM


Re: two old posts of mine
I personally find that John is the most revealing of the Gospels.
it says things that are true, but not in a quality that i like. as i said, something about christ preaching himself doesn't sit right with my view of him as a humble prophet and martyr -- and sacrifice.
Very few are interested in what He really was, and that is God...
son of god.
I strongly hear what the Apostle Paul is saying, and I don't dicount anything in scripture. I believe the whole Bible. That doesn't mean I can answer all of the very difficult questions that people raise. The details are unending.
and faith-testing. like you wouldn't believe. but everyone discounts something in the bible. i try to be honest about what do and don't like. but for instance, christianity as a matter of practice discounts leviticus, and the kosher laws. we feel they have been lifted, because we are under a new covenant. have you ever even read leviticus? ...or numbers? half of numbers is mind-numbingly dull.
I totally agree with you about some churches being false and victimizing people. The lifting of snakes is a perfect example. But I do understand it's proper interpretation:
The serpents are lies... demonic in origin. The poison is the wine(so to speak) of the false prophets. The christians job is to clear the bushes (the lies) and uproot them, all the while ingesting the deadly falsehoods and being unharmed, because they are so easy to see for the seeing. The goal is to give an unobstructed view of Christ.
yeah, i don't know about that. they are, however, following the direct commandment of the bible:
quote:
Mar 16:18 They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.
There are any number of way to say the same thing as I just mixed metaphors in my interpretation. The Bible is full of metaphor like that, not to mention parables.
yes, but,
It is like encryption. You need the code to understand it, and the code is the Spirit of God.
no. in my educated opinion, i whole-heartedly disagree. there is nothing encrypted in the bible. there some more metaphorical meanings, and some passages that are metaphor (parables), but i do not see that there is anything hidden from the average reader. everything is fairly plain to see -- the only time anything seems hidden from anyone is when i am dealing with some of the fundamentalists on this board. take my last two debates with iano, constantly trying to get him to agree to the words on the page. it's very frustrating to try to debate with people who do not wish to see past their assumptions.
if there is a spirit involved in that case, it's one of deception and not of god.
I find a lot of the Old Testament stories of battle and war, are direct examples of the spiritual war we face today. In those stories are tremendous lessons and confirmation and encouragement almost with a wink and a nod. In other words, the stories themselves seem to make no sense, but their true meaning is elsewhere. It is a supernatural experience to catch a glimpes of that revelation.
i think that the more you understand the stories themselves, the more you will understand what is built on top of them. the literal is the foundation: you have to get that right first. a crooked foundation results in a crooked building.
After being born again and in a very short time, it was as though the whole Bible was revealed to me as one grid. Not a lot of details, I just understood it. Very difficult to explain and not very logical. Just Divine revelation!
i find this is part of the "honeymoon" with christianity. we all go through it, not everyone comes back home. trust me, i thought i understood too. i didn't. i had no idea. we think we do, because the bible is such an integral part of our culture -- but we never stop to look at it through the eyes of the people who wrote it.
for instance, we all know the story of adam's apple. it's a small example, but it's not in the bible. even a moderately good literal reading will demonstrate that it could not have been an apple, either. we have lots of stories like this in our oral traditions regarding the bible and christianity -- and few of them are actually in the bible. for instance, the one you mentioned earlier, the fall of satan, is not. it's in milton's "paradise lost" and a few similar works. it's in some apocryphal texts (though varied highly). but it's nowhere in the bible. yet, we all "know" it, and it's often preached in church.
There is only one requirement to know God. That's one of the many things that made Jesus unique... So many today preach (falsely) that we cannot know the truth. Jesus said flatly you will know the truth. And the requirement is to give over total control of your life to him.
well, the requirement was "ask."
"ask, and you will recieve. seek, and you will find."
we can know the truth. we just rarely want to.
Christianity is not a religion. It is reality! It's not about belief, it is about the blind having their sight restored.
christianity is a faith. it's a belief.
Faith? yes!... but not at all blind.
i'll go into this a bit more in depth in a later post. but the more i study, the more i find that there is less and less basis for christianity. not in judaism, not in history. it's very, very distressing to be faced with evidence like that.
faith, by definition, is blind. and this is no exception -- we are not given tangible proof. even spiritual proof is doubtful, at best, and easily explained by modern pyschology is nearly every case. the situation, nearest i can tell, has been especially rigged for this one question:
given nothing, will we follow?
Edited by arachnophilia, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Rob, posted 06-15-2006 1:59 AM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by Rob, posted 06-16-2006 1:46 AM arachnophilia has replied

  
JavaMan
Member (Idle past 2347 days)
Posts: 475
From: York, England
Joined: 08-05-2005


Message 109 of 280 (321735)
06-15-2006 3:51 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by iano
06-14-2006 11:28 AM


Re: very depressing view!
Thats secular morality for you. And the moral relativism that goes with it. Hitler 'bad', Jane 'good' - according to Jane of course! I'll warrant Hitler had his own views.
To the victor goes the definition of morality
Neither Hitler nor Jane are the final arbiters of what is good or bad - society is. That's what morality has always been.

'I can't even fit all my wife's clothes into a suitcase for travelling. So you want me to believe we're going to put all of the planets and stars and everything into a sandwich bag?' - q3psycho on the Big Bang

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by iano, posted 06-14-2006 11:28 AM iano has not replied

  
JavaMan
Member (Idle past 2347 days)
Posts: 475
From: York, England
Joined: 08-05-2005


Message 110 of 280 (321736)
06-15-2006 3:55 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by PurpleYouko
06-14-2006 11:27 AM


Re: Blind justice
No I am not misunderstanding it as such, I am just applying my resoning to the concept of it that Iano is putting forward.
He says specifically that "justice does not care who pays the price, just so long as it gets paid."
I say that it most certainly does care who pays. In fact justice demands that the guilty party (the person that the justice system deams to be guilty, not necessarily the real guilty party) pays the price and specifically will not allow an innocent party to pay it instead.
That is justice
I agree with you about this. I was just being pedantic because you seemed to be suggesting that justice being blind in the conventional sense was somehow a problem. Maybe I should have kept my nose out .

'I can't even fit all my wife's clothes into a suitcase for travelling. So you want me to believe we're going to put all of the planets and stars and everything into a sandwich bag?' - q3psycho on the Big Bang

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by PurpleYouko, posted 06-14-2006 11:27 AM PurpleYouko has not replied

  
JavaMan
Member (Idle past 2347 days)
Posts: 475
From: York, England
Joined: 08-05-2005


Message 111 of 280 (321740)
06-15-2006 4:07 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by iano
06-14-2006 12:22 PM


Re: very depressing view!
It has little to do with the quality of the court. A person who walks into the police station and confesses to a crime will be arrested, questioned (Jesus knows all the details of our crime so makes a perfect confession). He appears before a judge who is only dealing with the evidence - justice is blind. "Guilty your honour" and sentence is passed. There is little else to it - decent court or no.
Your analogy is nonsense, iano, and it's actually counter-productive to your case. In law it's a fundamental principle of justice that the correct person is punished; if it were acceptable that anyone who confessed could be punished, the clear up rate would be phenomenal - every crime that gets even the slightest publicity has a whole host of kooks confessing to it.

'I can't even fit all my wife's clothes into a suitcase for travelling. So you want me to believe we're going to put all of the planets and stars and everything into a sandwich bag?' - q3psycho on the Big Bang

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by iano, posted 06-14-2006 12:22 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by iano, posted 06-15-2006 5:24 AM JavaMan has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1968 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 112 of 280 (321743)
06-15-2006 5:24 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by JavaMan
06-15-2006 4:07 AM


Re: very depressing view!
Admin unfurled the stop sign on our offshot earlier JM. No doubt the issue will unfurl again

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by JavaMan, posted 06-15-2006 4:07 AM JavaMan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by JavaMan, posted 06-15-2006 5:37 AM iano has not replied

  
JavaMan
Member (Idle past 2347 days)
Posts: 475
From: York, England
Joined: 08-05-2005


Message 113 of 280 (321746)
06-15-2006 5:33 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by Sour
06-14-2006 2:07 PM


Psychedelics and Credulity
Phenomena like synaesthesia, schizophrenia and body-dismorphia with counter-intuitive problems like Monty Hall convince me further that I would not necessarily trust my experience over science - in contradiction to JavaMan in his Problem with Science II thread.
I was going to reply to your post even before I saw the reference to myself, because my own background (including the psychedelic drugs) is quite similar - although I'm not nearly so credulous .
My own opinions aren't that different from yours (at least your current ones), although I don't believe that nihilism or determinism are a necessary outcome of atheism and materialism.
The question of how much we should trust our own experience isn't really what the Problem with Science II thread is about, but I understand where you're coming from now. It might be worth you starting a thread about it if you can find a good hook.
P.S. Do drugs if you must, but not too much

'I can't even fit all my wife's clothes into a suitcase for travelling. So you want me to believe we're going to put all of the planets and stars and everything into a sandwich bag?' - q3psycho on the Big Bang

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Sour, posted 06-14-2006 2:07 PM Sour has not replied

  
JavaMan
Member (Idle past 2347 days)
Posts: 475
From: York, England
Joined: 08-05-2005


Message 114 of 280 (321747)
06-15-2006 5:37 AM
Reply to: Message 112 by iano
06-15-2006 5:24 AM


Re: very depressing view!
Admin unfurled the stop sign on our offshot earlier JM. No doubt the issue will unfurl again
I missed that. I should stop replying to posts on page 5 of 20 .
As you say, I'm sure we'll get to discuss it again.

'I can't even fit all my wife's clothes into a suitcase for travelling. So you want me to believe we're going to put all of the planets and stars and everything into a sandwich bag?' - q3psycho on the Big Bang

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by iano, posted 06-15-2006 5:24 AM iano has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 115 of 280 (321754)
06-15-2006 7:37 AM
Reply to: Message 84 by crashfrog
06-14-2006 3:02 PM


Re: Crash's entirely predictable thoughts on the subject
What's the name of your church?
http://www.clcnj.org
I ask because I suspect you're thinking that my experiences in church happened in one of those stuffy, olde-tyme-religion churches that brooks no disagreement from established dogma.
I didn't really assume anything about the church you went to. There are many churches around here that are not old stuffy churches that claim all those things too, but fall short. But things are changing rapidly.
Where I live in the greater NY area, there are many liberals. Even the conservatives have a liberal flare to them. It reflects in the churches as well. Our church is mostly professional people that grew up around this area. It is a nice blend of all facets of life, and somehow we manage to find a middle ground.
and that gays and women who get abortions are abominations,
Just this Sunday, my Pastor mentioned the recent battle about same-sex marraige.
I asked him point blank, "besides religious reasons, so we have any reason to reject same-sex marraige?" His answer was no.
Then I asked, "do we have a right to force our religious views on the rest of the nation?" He answered no, and added that people just don't understand that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by crashfrog, posted 06-14-2006 3:02 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 116 of 280 (321759)
06-15-2006 8:04 AM
Reply to: Message 106 by macaroniandcheese
06-14-2006 5:09 PM


i'm more worried about my own worship rather than those of others. i don't care how dead a church is, i can't go if i don't feel what i'm saying. the problem is with what i feel.
Yea, I can totally relate to that. If I didn't "feel" the Holy Spirit the way I do now, then I would not be able to worship God the way I do now. I used to look at people and say "they are crazy", before I had anything to go on. How can we worship a God that we do not know?
For the time being, if you don't "feel" God, then I can only humbly suggest to worship Him in spirit and truth by being yourself, but never stop looking for Him. I don't think this is a problem for you, since you have no problem being yourself, and do not want to be decieved.
peace.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by macaroniandcheese, posted 06-14-2006 5:09 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by macaroniandcheese, posted 06-15-2006 3:49 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
scoff
Member
Posts: 37
Joined: 01-20-2006


Message 117 of 280 (321787)
06-15-2006 9:28 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Phat
06-12-2006 11:14 AM


No one's listening.
Edited by scoff, : No one's listening.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Phat, posted 06-12-2006 11:14 AM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18345
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 118 of 280 (321817)
06-15-2006 10:59 AM
Reply to: Message 26 by riVeRraT
06-13-2006 7:14 AM


TOPIC SYNOPSIS:
What have you learned concerning your overall views about Religion in general and God, specifically?
PurpleYouko in message#3 writes:
I have always had a rather scientific kind of way of looking at things and as I grew up I began to discover what appeared to be inconsistencies of logic in everything related to the religion which I had previously thought was to be my life.
One thing for sure. Religion is not logical, although I believe that the idea of a Creator is entirely logical.
PurpleYouko in message 3 writes:
It quickly became evident to me that my teachers didn't have the answers either but unlike me they were quite content to live in denial that there were even issues.
The problem that vexes my heart a bit (just a wee bit! ) these days is the Pastors and teachers whom I DO trust and whom are otherwise very intelligent people who are not political activists, good with their families and other peoples families as well...in fact, the only thing they all share is a firm and unbending belief in Biblical inerrency and literalism.
Gary in message 4 writes:
People should try to enjoy their lives and appreciate life for what it is, while trying to make things better for others. It is unnecessary to conjure up gods and an afterlife when people can work together, as the social animals they are, for the benefit of everyone without the negative influences of religion.
I personally never have seen God as something I conjured up. IMHO, He exists. Its a choice of belief, not of imagination. I certainly never conjured up the first overwhelming waves of emotion and awareness that washed over me when I first got saved. I agree with you, however, that expecting God to be a sugar daddy or a genie is NOT the right way to approach a relationship with a Deity. Religion most certainly DOES have many negative influences.
Iano in message 5 writes:
The more I get to know God specifically the worse Religion in general stinks.
What do you know?? Brother Ian and I agree totally on this point!
riVeRraT in message 6 writes:
Religion is only as good as the people who are doing it.
....and, as we well know, people never do God like God does God!
Rat writes:
Who is saved or not? I don't even care anymore. Jesus came to save, not to judge, so why should I?
You are well on your way to being cured of religion! Keep loving Jesus, Rat!
brennakimi in message 7 writes:
my mind and my heart don't know where to meet on this. i can accept any number of options theoretically, but none of it seems to be acceptable to me. worse, most christians are so judgemental and so unwelcoming and so unforgiving that i have no home with them.
it is, for the most part, the members of churches that have driven me away from god. and i am very close to just abandoning it all. god gave me a mind that questions everything and tests everything. the bible tells us to test and try the word and to test and try the spirit. i am of the mind that i'm doing the right thing and all i get is damnation from "god's people".
I know what you mean, Brenn. For me, I turned away from the religious people and concentrated on talking and communing (through prayer and quiet time) to God alone. He has yet to let me down,even though He won't let me win the lottery!
ReverendDG in message 8 writes:
as for god - i 've learned that the jewish/christian god is a mean cruel bastard and some of his followers tend to follow the groupthink that the end justifies the means...
Don't believe everything you read, Rev! As for groupthink, I totally agree that many if not MOST Christians never actually think for themselves until after they pull back from the trappings of organized religion. Then, perhaps, armed with wisdom and a better relationship with God outside of the show, the Christians can reunite and pray as equals, not merely mouthing the words on a big screen!
crashfrog in message 9 writes:
There's probably no such thing as God, or god, or any gods.
Im SO glad that you say probably, Kermie!
Frog writes:
I only start to have a problem with it when people refuse to ever engage their own thinking process on any issue that they think their religion has covered.
I think that you not only engage your thinking process but that you married it! Inseparable, you two!
Rob in message 12 writes:
If I had to explain why I believe Jesus was God in the simplest way possible. I would have to say that it is because He said so in the context of the language of the time and culture.
I got saved because I was touched by God. I never could differentiate which of the three persons of God touched me, but logic says it was the Holy Spirit. The Bible confirms some of my beliefs but never originates them. He is that personal, for me. (remember that God has existed long before the Bible!)
arachnophilia in message 13 writes:
i can tell you that for me, religion has raised nothing but questions. my life and my philosophy was much easier as an athiest.
So many questions! Why can't we just accept that we will know some day but not today?
Rob in message 15 writes:
I didn't know what doubt was, until I believed. All Hell broke loose!
I totally understand what you are saying!
arachnophilia in message 19 writes:
i'm not so sure about this angry god idea, where he's out to get us and punish us for our misdeeds. that's sure not the god jesus talked about. he refered to god has a father who lost a son, and rejoiced on his return. he refered to god as a bride missing part of her head-dress, diligently searching for it. he described god as shepherd who left the 99 sheep to find the one that fell behind. he told us that god loves us, and looks after us.
that's the god i believe in. not this "wages of sin is death" stuff. i cherish my relationship with my god, not mourn it, or constantly remind him how bad i am. i don't think he cares, i think he loves me (and you) in spite of that. i don't think god's love comes with conditions, especially not ones we can't meet by design.
I look at it as "The price of seperation is death". Sin=seperation. The whole point that God wants us to know is that like a fish out of a fishtank, we can't live without Him...yet He would rather that we willfully acknowledge Him and enjoy the water!
Rob in message 20 writes:
I like what you had to say, and I think that you do right in asking questions. I personally love the Apostle Paul, but as a good friend of mine warned me... 'Rob, be careful, there are different kinds of Christians.'
This whole fundamentalist thing is really overstated! When I tell someone they're a sinner, I expect to get a rise. It is offensive, and it is offensive because it is true. We are all sinners!
I like your stuff, cowboy!
sidelined in message 21 writes:
I think the Gods of men are the reflection of men's fears and egos and as such too petty and inadequate to be a serious notion to explain the world we exist in.
I agree that humans do not explain God except unto our own image, usually. I think, however, that without God, we will never explain the mysteries of not only the universe, but of our own inner universes.
mick in message 22 writes:
I realised before the age of around 13 that the supposedly spiritual goal of churches is actually a lie; a lie that exists in order to force people into social conformity and to make people stupid so that they spend their time working for their religious group rather than for their community as a whole.
You were a smart 13 year old! That just proves that humans are seperated from their source, especially the religious ones!
riVeRrat in message 26 writes:
Much has happened in a very short time.
You can say that again!

“There are two kinds of people: those who say to God, "Thy will be done," and those to whom God says, "All right, then, have it your way” --C.S.Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by riVeRraT, posted 06-13-2006 7:14 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3955 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 119 of 280 (321953)
06-15-2006 3:49 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by riVeRraT
06-15-2006 8:04 AM


i still feel god. but i think i feel him more now in that nature of mercy and kindness rather than someone with rules and requests and demands. i am more than aware of my failings, but i think it is more important to be kind and forgiving and generous and loving and so forth to others than to work so hard to achieve something i cannot be but instead to be humble and contrite and repentant.
I can only humbly suggest to worship Him in spirit and truth by being yourself
but thank you for allowing me this. i really appreciate it. you are a rare and precious gem.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by riVeRraT, posted 06-15-2006 8:04 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by riVeRraT, posted 06-15-2006 5:26 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 120 of 280 (321986)
06-15-2006 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by macaroniandcheese
06-15-2006 3:49 PM


i still feel god. but i think i feel him more now in that nature of mercy and kindness rather than someone with rules and requests and demands.
Operating in god's grace is a huge break through for people to accomplish. I have been to conferences specifically on the subject. It is part of the reason I have decided to be transparent about who and what I am, as you can see from these forums, I let it all hang out there. I don't care, because I know I live by grace alone. The rest is me just learning stuff.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by macaroniandcheese, posted 06-15-2006 3:49 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by macaroniandcheese, posted 06-15-2006 6:20 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024